Skip to content
Valley Medical Facilities Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Valley Medical Facilities Inc

To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.

$270k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$292k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $100,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $269,949 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $169,949 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$8,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$441M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTY$23,500
FOCUS ON RENEWAL NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION$8,500
WEST HILLS FOOD PANTRY$8,500
TWELVE LOAVES LLC$8,500
BEAVER COUNTY YMCA$8,500
SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$8,500
CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$8,500
FAMILIES MATTER$8,500
SEWICKLEY YMCA QUAKER VALLEY FOOD RELIEF$8,500
CENTER FOR HOPE$8,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $9k → 11%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $7k → 11%BEAVER COUNTY YMCA: $9k → 10%TWELVE LOAVES LLC: $9k → 10%BEAVER COUNTY YMCA: $7k → 10%CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $9k → 11%TWELVE LOAVES LLC: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$284k · 10 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$284k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+956%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FM
    FAMILIES MATTER FOOD PANTRY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEWICKLEY VALLEY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +16%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR HOPE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • CC
    CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $9k · revenue +956%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adams County Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
2
Cumby Food Pantry

food pantry

Food & Nutrition
3
Quakertown Food Pantry

The mission of the quakertown food pantry is to provide emergency food assistance to those in need in our community

Food & Nutrition
4
Mckeesport Agape Center

We provide emergency food, food pantry, clothing, hygiene, and other basic needs to the City of McKeesport We also provide family sustaining holiday help.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Youth Center
Youth Development
6
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
7
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—
8
Community Market of Pott Count

To provide consistent food acces to those in need in the greater pottawatomie county area.

Food & Nutrition
9
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
10
Sullivan County Food Pantry

To provide access to food for low-income families in the Sullivan County community in order to alleviate food insecurity and to improve the overall health and well-being of those served.

Food & Nutrition
11
Healing Hunger Beaver County

To provide relief to those facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
12
Hurley Community Development

Food pantry for low income families monthly

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Mens Christian Association of Sewickley Valley; the most unlike its peers is Twelve Loaves Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTY: $89,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTYFAMILIES MATTER FOOD PANTRY INC: $29,500 · PhilanthropyFAMILIES MATTER FOOD PANTRY INCYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEWICKLEY VALLEY: $29,500 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSO…CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOOD PANTRY: $21,000 · OtherCORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVE…WEST HILLS FOOD PANTRY: $15,500 · OtherWEST HILLS FOOD PANTRYSEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,500 · Human ServicesSEWICKLEY COMMUNITY C…TWELVE LOAVES LLC: $15,500 · Human ServicesTWELVE LOAVES LLCBEAVER COUNTY YMCA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $15,500 · Human ServicesBEAVER COUNTY YMCA EN…CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $8,500 · Human ServicesCORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY …CENTER FOR HOPE: $29,500 · Recreation & SportsCENTER FOR …FOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION: $22,500 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$119,000Other$66,000Human Services$55,000Recreation & Sports$29,500Community Improvement$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTY: $89,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFAMILIES MATTER FOOD PANTRY INC: $29,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEWICKLEY VALLEY: $29,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE: $29,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTWELVE LOAVES LLC: $15,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetBEAVER COUNTY YMCA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…The United Way of Sou…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Valley Medical Facilities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Valley Medical Facilities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Valley Medical Facilities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home