Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Valley Medical Facilities Inc

To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.

$270k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Food & Nutrition$292k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $100,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $269,949 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $169,949 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$8,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$441M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTY$23,500
BEAVER COUNTY YMCA$8,500
FOCUS ON RENEWAL NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION$8,500
WEST HILLS FOOD PANTRY$8,500
SEWICKLEY YMCA QUAKER VALLEY FOOD RELIEF$8,500
TWELVE LOAVES LLC$8,500
SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$8,500
CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$8,500
FAMILIES MATTER$8,500
CENTER FOR HOPE$8,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $9k → 11%TWELVE LOAVES LLC: $9k → 10%SEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $7k → 11%BEAVER COUNTY YMCA: $9k → 10%BEAVER COUNTY YMCA: $7k → 10%TWELVE LOAVES LLC: $7k → 10%CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$284k · 10 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$284k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+956%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEWICKLEY VALLEY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +16%
  • FM
    FAMILIES MATTER FOOD PANTRY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +4%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR HOPE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • CC
    CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $9k · revenue +956%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adams County Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
2
Cumby Food Pantry

food pantry

Food & Nutrition
3
Quakertown Food Pantry

The mission of the quakertown food pantry is to provide emergency food assistance to those in need in our community

Food & Nutrition
4
Mckeesport Agape Center

We provide emergency food, food pantry, clothing, hygiene, and other basic needs to the City of McKeesport We also provide family sustaining holiday help.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Youth Center
Youth Development
6
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
7
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

8
Community Market of Pott Count

To provide consistent food acces to those in need in the greater pottawatomie county area.

Food & Nutrition
9
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
10
Sullivan County Food Pantry

To provide access to food for low-income families in the Sullivan County community in order to alleviate food insecurity and to improve the overall health and well-being of those served.

Food & Nutrition
11
Healing Hunger Beaver County

To provide relief to those facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
12
Hurley Community Development

Food pantry for low income families monthly

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Mens Christian Association of Sewickley Valley and the most unlike its peers is Twelve Loaves Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTY — $89,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTYFAMILIES MATTER FOOD PANTRY INC — $29,500 · PhilanthropyFAMILIES MATTER FOOD PANTRY INCYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEWICKLEY VALLEY — $29,500 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSO…CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOOD PANTRY — $21,000 · OtherCORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVE…WEST HILLS FOOD PANTRY — $15,500 · OtherWEST HILLS FOOD PANTRYSEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER — $15,500 · Human ServicesSEWICKLEY COMMUNITY C…TWELVE LOAVES LLC — $15,500 · Human ServicesTWELVE LOAVES LLCBEAVER COUNTY YMCA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $15,500 · Human ServicesBEAVER COUNTY YMCA EN…CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $8,500 · Human ServicesCORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY …CENTER FOR HOPE — $29,500 · Recreation & SportsCENTER FOR …FOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $22,500 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$119,000Other$66,000Human Services$55,000Recreation & Sports$29,500Community Improvement$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTY — $89,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEWICKLEY VALLEY — $29,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES MATTER FOOD PANTRY INC — $29,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE — $29,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSEWICKLEY COMMUNITY CENTER — $15,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTWELVE LOAVES LLC — $15,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetBEAVER COUNTY YMCA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $15,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Valley Medical Facilities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph