How much does Ute City Charitable Trust give?

Ute City Charitable Trust reported 11 grants totaling $898,000 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 20 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.

What does Ute City Charitable Trust fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Public Benefit (54%), Human Services (23%), Education (12%).

Who are Ute City Charitable Trust's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Clal-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership Inc ($3.0M), College Unbound ($600k), Lawrence Family Jewish Community Centers of San Diego County ($50k).

Does Ute City Charitable Trust fund new organizations?

In FY2022, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Ute City Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Ute City Charitable Trust?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, National Philanthropic Trust.

Where is Ute City Charitable Trust based?

Ute City Charitable Trust is based in CA.

Ute City Charitable Trust

Ute City Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Ute City Charitable Trust

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$898k

Granted FY2022

Grants FY2022

States reached

$500k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Public Benefit$3.0MHuman Services$1.3MEducation$681kRecreation & Sports$176kReligion$129kHealth$110kArts & Culture$55kInternational$40kOther$0

02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k5 grants · $13k
$10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$50k–250k2 grants · $325k
$250k+1 grant · $500k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
CLAL	$500,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE	$225,000
COLLEGE UNBOUND	$100,000
LAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CTR	$25,000
CAMP MOUNTAIN CHAI	$25,000
VAYU GLOBAL HEALTH FOUNDATION	$10,000
ECHOES OF HOPE	$5,000
PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL	$5,000
CRAYONS 4 KIDS INC	$1,000
AMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION	$1,000
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$5.4M · 19 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.4M

$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%

+50%

Still filing today

53%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthReligionArts & CultureOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CN
CLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC
6× · 2017–2022 · $3.0M · revenue +17%
College Unbound
5× · 2017–2022 · $600k · revenue ×11
PR
PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL
5× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +50%

Funded once

EG
ELIZABETH GLASER PED AIDS
one grant, 2017 · $60k
OH
OPEN HILLEL INC
one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +13%
US
UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +78%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Judaism Foundation

—

Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International

Hillel Foundation at Miami University

Hillel at Miami University, the center of Jewish life on campus, seeks to engage, connect, and empower students to explore their Jewish identity creating a vibrant Jewish community and inspiring the next generation of Jewish leaders.

—

Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel's mission is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

Religion

Hillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington

The mission of Hillel at the University of Washington (Hillel UW) is to inspire students and young adults (ages 18-35) to explore, embrace, and celebrate Jewish life and identity.

—

The Avi Chai Foundation

Unclassified

Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education

The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—

University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—

Covenant Foundation

To build on existing strength within the field of jewish education in north america, by addressing all forms of pre-collegiate and adult jewish education through awards to individuals and grants to institutions for creative programs.

Education

The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc

Religion

Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation

Philanthropy

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is CRAYONS4KIDS Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/16

Grantees still filing

10/16

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Religion$3,014,000Other$2,389,500Education$81,000Health$40,000Arts & Culture$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ute City Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ute City Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Ute City’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home