Skip to content
Usta-Pacific Northwest Section at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Usta-Pacific Northwest Section

To promote the growth of tennis through engaging children, adults, and families in every neighborhood.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$590kEducation$40kHealth$13kYouth Development$8kHuman Services$6kCommunity Improvement$4kPublic Benefit$1kReligion$1k
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 49 grants below total $52,880, the rows itemized in this filing. The $118,406 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $65,526 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,150
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALASKA TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC$2,300
TENNIS OUTREACH PROGRAM OF PUGET SOUND$1,900
SOUTHRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL$1,700
SALEM TENNIS AND SWIM CLUB$1,550
SEATTLE TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,500
BOEING EMPLOYEE TENNIS CLUB$1,500
THE ALASKA CLUB$1,500
GREATER PORTLAND TENNIS COUNCIL$1,430
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$1,400
CENTRAL COAST TENNIS ASSOCIATION$1,350
THE VALLEY ATHLETIC CLUB$1,250
KELSO HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS TENNIS$1,150
BAINBRIDGE COMMUNITY TENNIS ASSOCIATION$1,150
READY SET TENNIS$1,150
KITSAP TENNIS AND ATHETLIC CENTER$1,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $375) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $375 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$543k · 52 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
36

Total granted

$543k
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

27%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TENNIS OUTREACH PROGRAMS OF PUGET SOUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +95%
  • PORTLAND TENNIS & EDUCATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $33k · revenue +45%
  • FT
    FAIRBANKS TENNIS ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IC
    IRVINGTON CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue +14%
  • SL
    SERVING LOVE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · 42% of their budget
  • MH
    MEAD HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crossroads Tennis Association
—
2
Robinson Tennis Academy
Youth Development
3
Donkor Tennis & Education Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
4
Vineyard Youth Tennnisinc
Recreation & Sports
5
Mountain View Sports & Racquet Club

Our mission is to promote the love of tennis among all ages and backgrounds with a special focus on nurturing young athletes to become lifelong tennis players with skills in dedication, discipline, and resilience.

Recreation & Sports
6
Patrick W Ryan Memorial Tennis Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
7
Get a Grip Tennis Association Inc
Youth Development
8
Portland Table Tennis Club

The Portland Table Tennis Club accommodates all-levels of play providing training and competition in a welcoming respectful and supportive environment. We help athletes of all ages achieve their highest potential and become life-long table…

Recreation & Sports
9
Usta-Pacific Northwest Section

To promote the growth of tennis through engaging children, adults, and families in every neighborhood.

—
10
Snovalley Cultural and Sports Club

Our Mission is to promote health, engage in cultural activities, and encourage recreational activities for adults and children

Recreation & Sports
11
Michigan Club Squash
Recreation & Sports
12
Thompson Falls Pickleball Club
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Tennis Club; the most unlike its peers is Centennial High School Booster. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALASKA TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $35,800 · OtherALASKA TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCPORTLAND FIRE AND RESCUE: $35,400 · OtherPORTLAND FIRE AND RESCUETHE AMY YEE TENNIS FOUNDATION: $28,395 · OtherTHE AMY YEE TENNIS FOUNDATIONSTEAMBOAT TENNIS AND ATHLETIC CLUB: $24,000 · OtherSTEAMBOAT TENNIS AND ATHLETIC CLUBTIMBERHILL RACQUET CLUB INC: $19,750 · OtherTHE BELLINGHAM TENNIS CLUB LLC: $19,136 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $18,350 · OtherPARENT BOOSTER USA INC: $15,278 · Other+72 more: $249,332 · Other+72 moreGREATER PORTLAND TENNIS COUNCIL: $42,455 · Recreation & SportsGREATER PORTLAND TENNIS COUN…SEATTLE TENNIS & EDUCATION: $34,850 · Recreation & SportsSEATTLE TENNIS & EDUCATIONTENNIS OUTREACH PROGRAMS OF PUGET SOUND: $34,750 · Recreation & SportsTENNIS OUTREACH PROGRAMS OF …PORTLAND TENNIS & EDUCATION: $32,800 · Recreation & SportsPORTLAND TENNIS & EDUCATIONSERVING LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 · Recreation & SportsSERVING LOVE FOUNDATION INCKIDS N' TENNIS: $8,520 · Recreation & Sports+3 more: $3,600 · Recreation & SportsFAIRBANKS TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $28,700 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI: $10,000 · EducationSports in Schools: $5,800 · EducationMOUNT RAINIER BOOSTER CLUB: $1,700 · EducationSkagit Valley College Foundation: $1,200 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE: $375 · Human Services
Other$445,441Recreation & Sports$168,475Youth Development$28,700Education$19,200Human Services$375

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEATTLE TENNIS & EDUCATION: $34,850 over 5y, 11% of budgetTENNIS OUTREACH PROGRAMS OF PUGET SOUND: $34,750 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPORTLAND TENNIS & EDUCATION: $32,800 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetFAIRBANKS TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $28,700 over 4y, 17% of budgetTIMBERHILL RACQUET CLUB INC: $19,750 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetIRVINGTON CLUB: $13,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYAKIMA TENNIS CLUB: $12,702 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetSERVING LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 1y, 42% of budgetBEND GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS N' TENNIS: $8,520 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSports in Schools: $5,800 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSpokane Racquet Club Inc: $5,549 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWillow Area Community Organization Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetASSOCIATED RECREATION COUNCIL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOEING EMPLOYEES' TENNIS CLUB: $2,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKITSAP TENNIS & ATHLETIC CENTER: $2,150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT RAINIER BOOSTER CLUB: $1,700 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPANTHER BOOSTER CLUB: $1,555 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSEATTLE TENNIS CLUB: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWENATCHEE RACQUET & ATHLETIC CLUB: $1,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSkagit Valley College Foundation: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSQUALICUM HIGH SCHOOL PTSA 83110: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST WHEELCHAIR TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $450 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARBOR HEIGHTS SWIM CLUB INC: $410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER PORTLAND TENNIS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE TENNIS & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds TENNIS OUTREACH PROGRAMS OF PUGET SOUND ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND TENNIS & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds FAIRBANKS TENNIS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TIMBERHILL RACQUET CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds IRVINGTON CLUB ↗
  • Who funds YAKIMA TENNIS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SERVING LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds BEND GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI ↗
  • Who funds KIDS N' TENNIS ↗
  • Who funds Sports in Schools ↗
  • Who funds Spokane Racquet Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds Willow Area Community Organization Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GenYOUTH IncorporatedRound It Up America I…For Inspiration and R…School's Out Washingt…Kaiser Foundation Hea…Northwest Harvest EmmPage Ahead Childrens …InvestedWashington First Robo…Oea Choice TrustSchoolhouse Supplies …Good Sports Inc
GenYOUTH IncorporatedIL30.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GenYOUTH Incorporated · Round It Up America Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · School's Out Washington · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · Northwest Harvest Emm · Page Ahead Childrens Literacy Prgm · Invested · Washington First Robotics · Oea Choice Trust · Schoolhouse Supplies Inc · Good Sports Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Usta-Pacific Northwest Section funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Usta-Pacific Northwest Section. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Usta-Pacific Northwest Section’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home