· Public charity
USA Triathlon Foundation
The mission of the USA Triathlon Foundation is to support and promote triathlon, and open pathways to triathlon to those whom it might not otherwise be possible.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $1,192,441 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,317,410 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $124,969 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USA TRIATHLON OF COLORADO | $1,182,441 |
| I-Tri | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 38% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UTUSA Triathlon of Colorado6× · 2019–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +10%
- HUHAMPTON UNIVERSITY3× · 2019–2022 · $180k · revenue +22%
University of San Francisco2× · 2018–2019 · $141k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- TCTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +31%
- CPCAL POLY HUMBOLDTone grant, 2022 · $65k
- NANAVAL ACADEMY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.
Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…
Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…
Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.
Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wagner College and the most unlike its peers is The Leff Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 72 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds USA Triathlon of Colorado ↗
- Who funds HAMPTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds KING UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WAGNER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds American International College ↗
- Who funds Eastern Mennonite University ↗
- Who funds LENOIR-RHYNE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEWBERRY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WINGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds COE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATIONAL TRIATHLON RACING INTERNATIONAL CORP ↗
- Who funds DAVIS & ELKINS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
- Who funds ST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Greensboro College ↗
- Who funds THE LEFF FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Trine University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Council of Independent Colleges · Ibm International Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation · Eunice a Turner Foundation Inc · The Edward M Armfield Sr Foundation I · Mathematical Association of America Inc · Interfaith America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization USA Triathlon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Delaware State University — 16% of income from government
- American International College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.