Skip to content
Upmc Lititz at a glance

· Public charity

Upmc Lititz

UPMC LITITZ' mission as a charitable organization is dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

$184k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$70kEducation$64kHealth$63kArts & Culture$58kHuman Services$22kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $105,530, the rows itemized in this filing. The $183,556 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $78,026 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION$49,030
LANCASTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY$15,000
UNITED WAY OF LEBANON COUNTY INC$10,000
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LANCASTER$7,500
FULTON THEATRE COMPANY$6,000
YMCA OF YORK AND YORK COUNTY PA$6,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF LEBANON COUNTY$6,000
ANNVILLE-CLEONA SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YMCA OF YORK AND YORK COUNTY PA: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 3 repeat orgs$171k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$116k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+28%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OP
    ON-LINE PUBLISHERS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $52k
  • LC
    LANCASTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $48k · revenue +5%
  • YL
    YWCA LANCASTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • LV
    LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $52k · revenue +15%
  • LV
    LEBANON VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +27%
  • CH
    CHOICES HEALTHCAREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Lehigh Valley Chamber of Commerce

To improve the economy and quality of communities in the lehigh valley metropolitan area.

—
2
Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry

The pennsylvania chamber of business and industry is the largest broad-based business association in pennsylvania. thousands of members throughout the commonwealth employ greater than 50 percent of pennsylvania's private workforce.…

—
3
Lewiston Auburn Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is an independent, member-supported organization, which exists to promote a positive business environment that contributes to the community amd economic vitality of the androscoggin county region.through networking events,…

—
4
Greater Pittsburgh Chamber of Commerce

The greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (gpcc) is the advocacy affiliate of the allegheny conference on community development (accd). (continued on sch o) the chamber works to improve the competitiveness of the pittsburgh region for…

Community Improvement
5
Lancaster County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Support member businesses through education and promotion, and support the quality of life in lancaster county through promoting compatible economic development.

Community Improvement
6
Danville Pittsylvania County Chamber of Commerce

To promote economic growth in the city of danville, va and pittsylvania county area.

Community Improvement
7
Los Altos Chamber of Commerce

To encourage and promote businesses and to stimulate a vibrant economy in los altos and los altos hills.

—
8
Pennsylvania Municipal League

The mission of the pennsylvania municipal league is to represent the interests of its membership and to serve local government by providing programs and cost-effective services and legislation, which strengthens the autonomy of…

—
9
Lewis Clark Valley Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the lewis clark valley chamber is to connect resources, businesses, and members to promote, advocate, and grow a properous local economy.

—
10
Greater Carlisle Area Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst that will actively promote and support responsible economic growth in the carlisle region, while continuing to provide enhanced benefits for our membership and a vibrant quality of life for our community.

—
11
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
12
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Lancaster County Chamber of Commerce; the most unlike its peers is Perry County Literacy Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ON-LINE PUBLISHERS INC: $52,100 · OtherON-LINE PUBLISHERS INCLANCASTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY: $48,100 · OtherLANCASTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRYYWCA LANCASTER: $16,000 · OtherYWCA LANCASTERLEBANON VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8,500 · OtherLEBANON VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCENORTHERN LANCASTER COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7,000 · OtherANNVILLE-CLEONA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $6,000 · OtherLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $52,000 · EducationLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGEPerry County Literacy Council: $6,000 · EducationPerry County Literacy …UPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $49,030 · HealthUPMC PINNACLE FOUND…CHOICES HEALTHCARE: $8,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROSES: $6,000 · Human ServicesFULTON THEATRE COMPANY: $6,000 · Arts & CultureVENTURE LITITZ INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF LEBANON COUNTY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF LEBANON COUNTY: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$137,700Education$58,000Health$49,030Human Services$14,000Arts & Culture$12,000Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $52,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $49,030 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLANCASTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY: $48,100 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYWCA LANCASTER: $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LEBANON COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHOICES HEALTHCARE: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN LANCASTER COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFULTON THEATRE COMPANY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVENTURE LITITZ INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPerry County Literacy Council: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF LEBANON COUNTY: $6,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wellspan HealthLancaster County Comm…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Wellspan HealthPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wellspan Health · Lancaster County Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Upmc Lititz funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Upmc Lititz. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Upmc Lititz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home