Skip to content
Upmc Hanover at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Upmc Hanover

UPMC HANOVER is a not-for-profit community hospital which is dedicated to the promotion of wellness, preservation of health, and the provision of diagnostic and therapeutic services to the people of the greater hanover area which encompasses a primary service area of ten-mile radius and a secondary radius of 15 miles.

$73k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$171kHealth$112kArts & Culture$50kCommunity Improvement$37kPhilanthropy$32kRecreation & Sports$20kHousing & Shelter$18k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $52,975, the rows itemized in this filing. The $73,025 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,050 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$34,975
Median grant
1
States reached
$114M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION$34,975
NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $18k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $18k → 9%THE BRETHREN HOME COMMUNITY: $20k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $18k → 9%New Hope Ministries: $18k → 9%THE BRETHEREN HOME COMMUNITY: $10k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $18k → 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $18k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$350k · 11 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$350k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $108k · revenue +97%
  • WH
    WELLSPAN HEALTH
    2× · 2018–2019 · $39k · revenue +167%
  • TB
    THE BRETHREN HOME COMMUNITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CA
    CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF YORK COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue +38%
  • FM
    FOREVER MEDIA-WOMEN'S SHOW
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • PP
    PINK POWERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vna Home Health Services

Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…

—
2
Gettysburg Hospital

Gettysburg hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high quality health care services for the people who live, work, travel through, and vacation in adams county, pennsylvania and northern maryland.

Health
3
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
4
Wellspan Medical Group

The wellspan medical group was founded and operates on the belief that a large, well-organized group practice, based on primary and preventive care, and working collaboratively as part of an integrated health care delivery system, can…

Health
5
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
6
Upmc Hanover

Upmc hanover is a not-for-profit community hospital which is dedicated to the promotion of wellness, preservation of health, and the provision of diagnostic and therapeutic services to the people of the greater hanover area which…

Health
7
Waynesboro Hospital

Waynesboro hospital is a regional nonprofit healthcare organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
8
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Lebanon Pennsylvania

The good samaritan hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high-quality, compassionate healthcare that improves the overall health of the community.

Health
9
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
10
Young Women's Christian Association of Gettysburg and Adams County

The ywca of gettysburg & adams county is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all. the ywca is adams county's center for personal and community growth - a place to learn,…

—
11
York Hospital

York hospital is a premier community teaching hospital providing quality, cost-effective health care services strongly supporting excellence in education, and offering essential services without regard for an individual's ability to pay.

Health
12
Summit Physician Services

Summit physician services, and the associated wellspan medical group, operate on the belief that a large, well-organized group practice, based on primary and preventive care, and working collaboratively as part of an integrated health care…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Womens Christian Association of Hanover Pennsylvania; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Codorus State Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $108,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INCTHE BRETHREN HOME COMMUNITY: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRETHREN HOME COMMUNITYSWEET CHARITIES OF HANOVER INC: $42,000 · OtherSWEET CHARITIES OF HANOVER I…HANOVER AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $24,290 · OtherHANOVER AREA CHAMBER OF COMM…HANOVER AREA YMCA: $18,000 · OtherHANOVER AREA YMCAGETTYSBURG ADAMS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $13,160 · OtherGETTYSBURG ADAMS CHAMBER OF …FOREVER MEDIA-WOMEN'S SHOW: $12,150 · OtherFOREVER MEDIA-WOMEN'S SHOWWELLSPAN HEALTH: $38,650 · HealthWELLSPAN HEALTHUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $34,975 · HealthUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATIONAmerican Heart Association Inc: $23,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Associatio…CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF YORK COUNTY: $37,500 · Arts & CultureCULTURAL …FRIENDS OF CODORUS STATE PARK: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE BRETHREN HOME FOUNDATION: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER PENNSYLVANIA: $15,000 · EnvironmentPINK POWER: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$138,000Other$109,600Health$97,125Arts & Culture$37,500Recreation & Sports$20,000Housing & Shelter$17,500Environment$15,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $108,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSWEET CHARITIES OF HANOVER INC: $42,000 over 4y, 86% of budgetWELLSPAN HEALTH: $38,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL ALLIANCE OF YORK COUNTY: $37,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $34,975 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BRETHREN HOME COMMUNITY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANOVER AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $24,290 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $23,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CODORUS STATE PARK: $20,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetHANOVER AREA YMCA: $18,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BRETHREN HOME FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER PENNSYLVANIA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGETTYSBURG ADAMS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $13,160 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPINK POWER: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Airie Knipel Harry V …York County Community…Upmc GroupThe Arlene Utz Hollin…United Way of York Co…Kinsley FoundationPowder Mill FoundationDonor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Airie Knipel Harry V and J William Warehime FoundationPA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Airie Knipel Harry V and J William Warehime Foundation · York County Community Foundation · Upmc Group · The Arlene Utz Hollinger Foundation · United Way of York County · Kinsley Foundation · Powder Mill Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Upmc Hanover funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Upmc Hanover. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Upmc Hanover’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home