Skip to content
Uofl Health-Louisville Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Uofl Health-Louisville Inc

To operate and maintain hospitals affiliated with the university of louisville school of medicine and to provide care for the people who are in need of those, or related, medical services.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$10MHealth$475kPublic Benefit$100kArts & Culture$98kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kHuman Services$37kRecreation & Sports$30kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $80,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,187,430 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,107,430 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$903M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$15,000
TWISTED PINK INC$10,000
HOPE SCARVES$10,000
LOUTEENTH LLC$10,000
SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY FESTIVAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 14 repeat orgs$460k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
21

Total granted

$11M
$450k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+1%

Still filing today

86%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $111k · revenue +33%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +27%
  • RT
    RIVERSIDE THE FARNSLEY-MOREMEN LANDING INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $134k · revenue -26%
  • BI
    BRAIN INJURY ALLIANCE OF KENTUCKY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $54k · revenue -20%
  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Kidney Cancer Association

The kidney cancer association is a global community dedicated to serving and empowering patients, and leading change through advocacy, research, and education in order to be the universal leader in finding the cure for kidney cancer.

Health
2
Kentucky Medical Association

The kentucky medical association provides physician advocacy through governmental interaction, legal intervention, and public education, as well as providing physician education through periodic workshops/seminars, and an annual convention…

—
3
Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky Inc

Addressing the unmet health needs of kentuckians by developing and influencing policy, improving access to care, reducing health risks and disparities, and promoting health equity. the foundation makes grants, conducts campaigns, supports…

Health
4
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
5
University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Foundation Inc

Support for Markey Cancer Center Hospital building expansion and research projects.

—
6
Kentucky Bankers Association

To provide effective advocacy for the financial services industry both in kentucky and on a national level; to serve as a reliable and responsive source of information and education about areas of interest to the industry; and to provide a…

—
7
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
8
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
9
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
10
Greater Louisville Medical Society

Greater louisville medical society empowers physicians by creating engaging experiences, advancing meaningful advocacy and building impactful relationships in the community.

—
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
Kentucky Blood Center Inc

At kentucky blood center, our mission is to ensure a safe and abundant supply of lifegiving blood to the hospitals we serve. we are here to support our local communities in any way that we are able by being an integral and valued partner…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Louisville Sports Commission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Riverside the Farnsley-Moremen Landing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
17/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $10,203,872 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE+14 more: $332,836 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $111,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $60,000 · HealthHOPE SCARVES INC: $35,000 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $25,000 · HealthGREATER LOUISVILLE MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · HealthNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN: $20,000 · HealthKENTUCKY AND SOUTHERN INDIANA STROKE ASSOCIATION INC: $19,000 · HealthFHGR INC: $15,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $15,300 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $134,333 · EducationTwisted Pink Inc: $67,200 · PhilanthropyJEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70,250 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesRIVERSIDE THE FARNSLEY-MOREMEN LANDING INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMUHAMMAD ALI MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY FESTIVAL & PARADE COMMITTEE INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER LOUISVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION INC: $9,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$10,536,708Health$336,300Education$134,333Philanthropy$79,200Human Services$75,250Arts & Culture$60,000Recreation & Sports$29,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $134,333 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $111,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTwisted Pink Inc: $67,200 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ALLIANCE OF KENTUCKY INC: $54,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetHOPE SCARVES INC: $35,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetRIVERSIDE THE FARNSLEY-MOREMEN LANDING INC: $30,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetMUHAMMAD ALI MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOUISVILLE MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY FESTIVAL & PARADE COMMITTEE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetKENTUCKY DERBY FESTIVAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKENTUCKY AND SOUTHERN INDIANA STROKE ASSOCIATION INC: $19,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetGOOD HEALTH IDEAS INC DBA COLON CANCER PREVENTION PROJECT: $17,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetLINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFHGR INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKOSAIR CHARITIES COMMITTEE INC: $10,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER LOUISVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION INC: $9,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN INC: $7,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIVELY AREA MINISTRIES: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KENTUCKIANA INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Community Foundat…The Community Foundat…Norton Healthcare IncBaptist Healthcare Sy…Baird Foundation IncRepublic Bank Foundat…Shirley's Way IncLG&E and Ku Foundatio…University Medical Ce…Sociable Weaver Found…Kosair Charities Comm…
The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY35× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Norton Healthcare Inc · Baptist Healthcare System Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · Shirley's Way Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · University Medical Center Inc · Sociable Weaver Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uofl Health-Louisville Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uofl Health-Louisville Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Uofl Health-Louisville’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home