Skip to content

· Private foundation

Unruh Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$322kHealth$104kHuman Services$35kReligion$25kHousing & Shelter$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SERENTITY HOUSE INC$10,000
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SERENTITY HOUSE INC: $10k → 9%SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES: $5k → 12%HAPPY HOME FURNITURE INC: $5k → 10%GUERIN INC: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 65% of Unruh Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 36% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 22%.

Unruh Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$411k · 6 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$411k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $217k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MS SOCIETY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $55k

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARY OF THE KNOBS CATHOLIC CHURCH FLOYDS KNOBS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • GI
    GUERIN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +18%
  • AS
    ANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Serenity Inc Foster Care

The mission of Serenity is to break the cycle of child abuse through prevention and early intervention services for children and their families by providing quality foster home, individual and group counseling services and adoptions.

—
2
Serenity Inc

To provide assistance to men suffering from the disease of alcoholism and to help in their rehabilitation from the mental and physical anguish caused by alcoholism.

Health
3
Serenity Hospice and Home

Patient care and counseling of the terminally ill and their families.

—
4
Hildegard House Incorporated

Providing a home and compassionate care for individuals at the end of life who have no income or loved ones to care for them so that they may die with dignity.

Housing & Shelter
5
Lydia's House Inc

Our mission is to provide safe, stable and supportive housing to women and children in transition and crisis.

Housing & Shelter
6
Serenity Consultants Inc

Serenity recovery network provides safe affordable housing for men and women recovering from alcoholism and drug addiction.

Health
7
Elizabeth Seton Housing Corporation

Elizabeth Seton Housing Corporation provides housing for adults with developmental disabilities who have complex support needs in small residential home environments. The Corporation is operated in connection with the mission of St. Joseph…

Human Services
8
Grace Recovery Homes Inc
Health
9
Gilgal Inc

Transitional assistance and housing for women struggling with addiction and life skills. the mission is to restore these women to regain independence through clean living.

Health
10
Gilead House

The Gilead House mission is to transform the lives of mothers and their children through empowering life skills programs, mentoring and transitional housing. We provide an environment that reflects our faith in Gods love.The vision is that…

Housing & Shelter
11
Safe House for Women Inc

The mission of the safe house for women is to provide safe refuge and support services to those affected by domestic abuse and violence, to provide training and education to increase awareness of and prevention of domestic violence for the…

Human Services
12
Serenity Inc

Provide shelter and services to victims of domestic violence.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifespan Resources Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smile Train Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL INC: $217,000 · OtherASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL INCOUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE HIGH SCHOOL: $99,999 · OtherOUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE HIGH SCHOOLNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $55,000 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYST MARY OF THE KNOBS CATHOLIC CHURCH FLOYDS KNOBS INC: $25,000 · OtherST MARY OF THE KNOBS CATHOLIC CHURCH FLOYDS KNOBS INCGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $19,000 · Other+7 more: $50,000 · Other+7 moreGUERIN INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesSERENITY HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY HOME FURNITURE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $4,770 · Human ServicesANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Health
Other$465,999Human Services$32,270Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $19,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESPAN RESOURCES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Elizabeth Catholic Charities Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHAPPY HOME FURNITURE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $4,770 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds GUERIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SERENITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESPAN RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds St Elizabeth Catholic Charities Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY HOME FURNITURE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Southern Indiana IncIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southern Indiana Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Unruh Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Unruh Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Unruh Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Unruh Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Unruh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph