Skip to content
University of Giving at a glance

· Private foundation

University of Giving

TO PARTNER WITH SCHOOLS, TEACHERS AND STUDENTS TO EDUCATE STUDENTS REGARDING PHILANTHROPY AND ALLOW STUDENTS TO BE PART OF PHILANTHROPIC EFFORTS.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$24kFood & Nutrition$11kHousing & Shelter$10kReligion$6kPublic Benefit$5kHuman Services$4kRecreation & Sports$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELCOME HOME MINISTRIES AFRICA$5,000
COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN$5,000
MISSION 26$1,000
CAMP SUNSHINE$1,000
FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION$500
HUNT 2 HEAL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $1k → 8%CAMP SUNSHINE: $1k → 8%CAMP SUNSHINE INC: $500 → 8%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $5k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $1k → 8%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%WEST MICHIGAN MIRACLE LEAGUE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope Midwest

The House of Hope is dedicated to serving individuals, families, and our community by providing a hand up into a hope-filled future.

Human Services
2
Hope On Horseback

Hope on Horseback is dedicated to enhancing the physical, mental, emotional and social wellbeing of individuals with special needs through safe equine assisted activities.

—
3
Camp High Hopes

The mission of camp high hopes is to provide fun, safe, and adaptive recreational experiences for children, teens, and adults with disabilities, special needs, and chronic illnesses.

Human Services
4
Healing Farm Ministries

To provide hope and opportunity to people with disabilities and their families, while teaching the community to do the same.

Recreation & Sports
5
With Hope

With Hope is an non-profit organization that provides resources for individuals with special needs.

Human Services
6
House of Hope

House of Hope's mission is to encourage, equip, and empower women to live fully through classes, community, housing, and therapy.

Health
7
Friendship House Corporation

The Friendship House provides assistance and support to the families of children with special needs.

Human Services
8
Hope Reins

Hope reins' vision is to inspire true hope and real healing for every child. at our ranch, we pair children and teens experiencing trauma with a rescued horse and mentor to find hope and healing. the free-of-charge individual and group…

Health
9
St Gerard House

Our Mission is to help individuals with autism and their families experience more joy and achieve meaningful life outcomes by providing evidence-based therapies, innovative programs and continuous advocacy.

Education
10
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
11
Beacon of Hope

Beacon of hope's mission is to be god's hand offering christ-centered, inclusive, accessible and professional mental health counseling.

Religion
12
Bridge of Hope Ministries

Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Sunshine; the most unlike its peers is 92 for 22. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Our Hope Association: $5,250 · OtherOur Hope AssociationWELCOME HOME MINISTRIES AFRICA: $5,000 · OtherWELCOME HOME MINISTRIES AFRICATHE GREEN APPLE PANTRY: $5,000 · OtherTHE GREEN APPLE PANTRYSANFILIPPO HOPE INITIATIVE: $5,000 · OtherSANFILIPPO HOPE INITIATIVELOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR: $1,250 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 · OtherMISSION 26: $1,000 · Other+3 more: $1,500 · Other+3 moreCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGANGeorgetown Harmony Homes: $5,000 · Human ServicesGeorgetown Harmony HomesCAMP SUNSHINE: $1,500 · Human ServicesCAMP SUNSHINEWEST MICHIGAN MIRACLE LEAGUE: $1,000 · Human ServicesWEST MICHIGAN MIRACLE LEA…BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $1,000 · Human ServicesBENJAMIN'S HOPEPaws With A Cause: $1,000 · Human ServicesPaws With A CauseTHE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Human ServicesHUNT2HEAL: $5,500 · HealthHUNT2HEALSTARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP: $5,000 · HealthSTARLITE SHORES FAMI…I Understand Love Heals: $1,000 · HealthI Understand Love He…CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $500 · HealthHAND2HAND: $6,000 · Food & NutritionHAND2HAND92 FOR 22: $5,000 · Public Benefit20 Liters: $1,000 · InternationalH U G S for Horses and Children: $1,000 · AnimalsAYA YOUTH COLLECTIVE: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$25,000Human Services$15,000Health$12,000Food & Nutrition$6,000Public Benefit$5,000International$1,000Animals$1,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAND2HAND: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNT2HEAL: $5,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetOur Hope Association: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget92 FOR 22: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGeorgetown Harmony Homes: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSTARLITE SHORES FAMILY CAMP: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget20 Liters: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN MIRACLE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetH U G S for Horses and Children: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetI Understand Love Heals: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBENJAMIN'S HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAYA YOUTH COLLECTIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGGIES MISSION CAFE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Grand Rapids Communit…Peter C & Emajean Coo…The Mercantile Bank F…Frey FoundationLarry and Karen Mulde…The Shine FoundationCdv5 FoundationHeart of West Michiga…Consumers Energy Foun…Natl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…
The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · The Mercantile Bank Foundation · Frey Foundation · Larry and Karen Mulder Foundation · The Shine Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Consumers Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University of Giving funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University of Giving. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to University of Giving?

    Find your warmest path to University of Giving through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on University of Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home