Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Greater Charlottesville

The UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE connects our community, enabling individuals and families to achieve their potential.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$1.2MHuman Services$784kCommunity Improvement$527kHousing & Shelter$323kEducation$208kEmployment$174kFood & Nutrition$171kYouth Development$164kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 34 grants below total $384,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,338,302 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $954,302 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $263k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIEDMONT YMCA EARLY LEARNING CENTER$50,000
PILGRIM BAPTIST CHURCH$22,500
KIDZ NATION - HARVEST CHURCH$20,000
PIPER IVY PRESCHOOL$20,000
MONSTER CLEANING SERVICES$10,000
SISTERS WHO CARE$10,000
THE SCRAPPY ELEPHANT$10,000
BLACK ROSES$10,000
PEARL ISLAND FOODS LLC$10,000
DREADHEAD LLC$10,000
RITA'S BRIGHT BEGINNINGS$10,000
STEPPEMEDIA$10,000
FLAVOR-MART$10,000
SECOND SERVE TENNIS$10,000
ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $716k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%READYKIDS: $113k → 8%READYKIDS: $80k → 8%READYKIDS: $73k → 8%READYKIDS: $52k → 8%PIEDMONT YMCA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $50k → 8%READYKIDS: $50k → 8%CHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $49k → 8%CHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $34k → 8%READYKIDS: $30k → 8%NEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25k → 8%SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY: $20k → 8%THE HAVEN: $13k → 8%GEORGIA'S FRIENDS: $10k → 8%ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $8k → 8%PIEDMONT YMCA INTERGENERATIONAL CENTER: $40k → 8%YMCA INTERGENERATIONAL LEARNING CENTER: $30k → 8%PIEDMONT YMCA INTERGENERATIONAL CENTER: $30k → 8%CITY OF PROMISE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 26 repeat orgs$787k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
31

Total granted

$3.1M
$473k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+30%

Still filing today

88%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $314k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $661k · revenue +7%
  • RI
    READYKIDS INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $398k · revenue +31%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $192k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • PA
    PEOPLE AND CONGREGATIONS ENGAGED IN MINISTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +58%
  • IN
    International Neighbors Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +250%
  • BG
    BUILDING GOODNESS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +96%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Commonwealth Institute for

To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.

Public Benefit
2
Central Virginia Housing Coalition

Central virginia housing coalition improves the regional quality of life by providing affordable housing opportunities to low income families through coalition, education, counseling, and financial assistance.

—
3
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
4
Central Virginia Partnership for Economic Development

To promote economic development in the charlottesville and central virginia region.

—
5
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
6
Virginia Community Development Corp

VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.

Housing & Shelter
7
Charlottes Community Outreach

Organized KHAOS is a 12 week curriculum provided by KHAOS Koaches to teach kids how to assess, address, and reduce the impact of toxic and traumatic stress in t heir lives. This program is provided in schools and community organizations.…

Human Services
8
Central Virginia Health Services Inc

Central virginia health services, inc. (organization) is a non-profit health care organization with locations in bowling green, charles city, new canton, charlotte court house, farmville, alberta, petersburg, aylett, hopewell, montross,…

Health
9
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
10
Charlottesville Public Housing Association of Residents Inc

To educate and empower low-income residents to protect and improve our own communities through collective action. phar has a recognized federal mandate to represent residents in all aspects of charlottesville redevelopment & housing…

Housing & Shelter
11
New Virginia Majority

New Virginia Majority is a grassroots organization that works with low income people in local communities through leadership development, trainings and workshops, issue education and advocacy.

Civil Rights
12
Habitat for Humanity Virginia

Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monticello Area Community Action Agency and the most unlike its peers is The 30 Day Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%8%5–10yr21%25%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr14%30%35–55yr12%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr21%33%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr12%22%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/88
the rest of the field
10%
131/1,343

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
31/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC — $661,455 · OtherCHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INCGREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $147,600 · OtherGREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCBLUE RIDGE HEALTH CENTER INC — $143,500 · OtherBLUE RIDGE HEALTH CENTER INCLOCAL FOOD HUB INC — $75,500 · OtherMONTICELLO AREA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $67,000 · OtherOffender Aid and Restoration of Charlottesville and Albemarle — $90,100 · OtherCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT COLLABORATIVE — $85,000 · Other+55 more — $710,440 · Other+55 moreREADYKIDS INC — $398,330 · Human ServicesREADYKIDS INCPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC — $149,946 · Human ServicesPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA I…CHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES — $82,600 · Human ServicesCHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDA…CITY OF PROMISE INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesCITY OF PROMISE INC+5 more — $75,000 · Human Services+5 moreTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE — $192,000 · HealthTHE WOMEN'S …CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC — $134,500 · HealthCHARLOTTESVI…ON OUR OWN CHARLOTTESVILLE VA INC — $104,900 · HealthON OUR OWN C…RECLAIMED HOPE INITIATIVE — $15,000 · HealthCultivate Charlottesville — $76,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA — $73,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPUTERS4KIDS — $58,700 · Youth DevelopmentTHE UHURU FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentYouth Development Council of Greene County — $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE — $107,600 · EducationPIEDMONT VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationAFRICAN AMERICAN TEACHING FELLOWS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE INC — $25,000 · Education100 Black Men of Central Virginia — $15,000 · EducationSOHO CENTER FOR ARTS AND EDUCATION INC — $8,000 · EducationWorkSource Enterprises — $174,386 · EmploymentPIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE — $95,000 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE AND CONGREGATIONS ENGAGED IN MINISTRY — $30,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,980,595Human Services$760,876Health$446,400Youth Development$240,200Education$185,600Employment$174,386Housing & Shelter$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC — $661,455 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetREADYKIDS INC — $398,330 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE — $192,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetWorkSource Enterprises — $174,386 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC — $149,946 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $147,600 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBLUE RIDGE HEALTH CENTER INC — $143,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC — $134,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE — $107,600 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetON OUR OWN CHARLOTTESVILLE VA INC — $104,900 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetPIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE — $95,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetOffender Aid and Restoration of Charlottesville and Albemarle — $90,100 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT COLLABORATIVE — $85,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES — $82,600 over 2y, 11% of budgetCultivate Charlottesville — $76,500 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetLOCAL FOOD HUB INC — $75,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA — $73,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMONTICELLO AREA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $67,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOMPUTERS4KIDS — $58,700 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetCITY OF PROMISE INC — $55,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetTHE 30 DAY FUND INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE AND CONGREGATIONS ENGAGED IN MINISTRY — $30,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetInternational Neighbors Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetBUILDING GOODNESS FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPIEDMONT VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF STAUNTON AUGUSTA COUNTY & WAYNESBORO INC — $25,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetNEW HILL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN TEACHING FELLOWS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOOTHILLS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE UHURU FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRECLAIMED HOPE INITIATIVE — $15,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget100 Black Men of Central Virginia — $15,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE — $11,440 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetELK HILL FARM INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA'S FRIENDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOHO CENTER FOR ARTS AND EDUCATION INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE TOMORROW — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area …The J & E Berkley Fou…Manning Family Founda…Perry Foundation IncCaplin FoundationThe Genan FoundationSentara HealthThe Charles Fund IncOakwood Foundation Ch…Thomas C & Mary Ann H…The Oak Hill FundS&P Global Foundation…
Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA83.1× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · Caplin Foundation · The Genan Foundation · Sentara Health · The Charles Fund Inc · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · Thomas C & Mary Ann Hays Fam Char Tr · The Oak Hill Fund · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Greater Charlottesville funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines