Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Yellowstone County Inc

To address the needs of yellowstone county and to improve lives by connecting and collaborating for a thriving community.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$1.1MReligion$374kCrime & Legal$312kYouth Development$291kEducation$164kHealth$55kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$479k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEAD START$38,196
VETERANS NAVIGATION NETWORK$35,000
YWCA$31,792
ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE$31,792
DISTRICT 7 HRDC$25,000
YOUNG FAMILIES EARLY HEAD START$20,000
FAMILY SERVICE INC$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-EASTERN MONTANA$20,000
BILLINGS FAMILY YMCA INC$19,306
EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS-READING ROCKS$18,915
EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS-BACKPACK MEALS$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA$10,000
YELLOWSTONE CASA$10,000
TUMBLEWEED$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $661k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TUMBLEWEED: $30k → 9%TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC: $25k → 9%TUMBLEWEED: $22k → 9%Tumbleweed Runaway Program Inc: $20k → 9%TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC: $20k → 9%TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC: $20k → 9%BILLINGS FAMILY YMCA INC: $19k → 9%TUMBLEWEED: $19k → 9%TUMBLEWEED: $19k → 9%BILLINGS FAMILY YMCA INC: $10k → 9%TUMBLEWEED: $10k → 9%Big Sky Senior Services Inc: $58k → 9%BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $40k → 9%BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $40k → 9%BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $40k → 9%BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES: $35k → 9%ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $32k → 9%BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES: $30k → 9%BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES: $30k → 9%Adult Resource Alliance: $25k → 9%ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $20k → 9%ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $20k → 9%ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE: $20k → 9%ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE MEALS ON WHEELS: $18k → 9%ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE MEALS ON WHEELS: $15k → 9%ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE MEALS ON WHEELS: $15k → 9%BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 19% of United Way of Yellowstone County Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MT; read by stated purpose it is 86% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

United Way of Yellowstone County Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 14 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$2.7M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationReligionCrime & LegalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BILLINGS MONTANA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $376k · revenue +11%
  • FH
    FRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $374k · revenue +89%
  • YC
    YELLOWSTONE CASA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $312k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • AI
    AWARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yellowstone County Assistance Network

To empower people living in the big horn basin of wyoming to enhance health and employment status, overcome obsticales, and end economic hardship.

Human Services
2
Yellowstone Behavioral Health

Provide quality mental health services to residents of park county

3
Youth Dynamics Inc

Youth dynamics provides family focused behavioral health treatment founded on the principles of an actively caring and trauma sensitive culture in which people can realize their full potential.

4
Youth Alternative Home Association

The group home and shelter is for the long and short term care, guidance and education of troubled youth age 10 to 17 in southwest wyoming. we arrange for them to be in counseling but do not provide this service.

Human Services
5
Youth Home Inc

To equip and empower youth, adults, and families to become healthier and contributing members of the community by providing compassionate emotional and behavioral intensive residential treatment & qualified residential treatment for ages…

Health
6
Friends of the Children - Montana

Friends of the children montana has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Youth Development
7
Yellowstone Valley Animal Shelter

Yellowstone valley animal shelter is dedicated to strengthening the human-animal bond by providing compassionate and high-quality care, education, and resources to the community.

Animals
8
Mountain Home Montana Inc

To provide a safe, stable , and nurturing home where young mothers can discover their strengths, and their children can experience the joys of childhood.

Human Services
9
Community Youth Services

Empowers youth at-risk and their families to meet goals for safety, stability, belonging and success by providing a continuum of individualized services and advocacy.

Human Services
10
Youth Shelters & Family Services Inc

To deliver life-changing services to homeless, runaway, and in-crisis youth in northern nm.

Human Services
11
Child Care Resources

Child care resources' mission is to help kids grow into successful adults by enriching the learning environment of their crucial early years.

Human Services
12
Youth Service Bureau of Illinois Valley

The mission of youth service bureau of illinois valley (ysb) is to help young people and families succeed by serving them in their home, school and community. ysb provides foster care, counseling and crisis intervention services to clients…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone Boys & Girls Ranch and the most unlike its peers is Veterans Navigation Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES INC — $283,000 · Human ServicesBIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES INCFAMILY SERVICE — $241,250 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICETUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC — $184,375 · Human ServicesTUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INCADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY — $164,292 · Human ServicesADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE OF YELLOWSTONE COUN…DISTRICT 7 HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC — $159,375 · Human ServicesDISTRICT 7 HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT COUN…+1 more — $29,306 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BILLINGS MONTANA — $375,543 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRIS…EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $68,915 · OtherEDUCATION FOUNDATIO…DISTRICT 7 HRDC — $25,000 · Other+1 more — $10,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE INC — $373,750 · ReligionFRIENDSHIP HOUS…YELLOWSTONE CASA INC — $311,875 · Crime & LegalYELLOWSTONE …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY — $246,250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIR…FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - AUSTIN — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF T…YOUNG FAMILIES EARLY HEAD START — $125,625 · EducationHEAD START INC — $38,196 · EducationVeterans Navigation Network — $45,000 · HealthYELLOWSTONE BOYS & GIRLS RANCH — $10,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$1,061,598Other$479,458Religion$373,750Crime & Legal$311,875Youth Development$291,250Education$163,821Health$55,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BILLINGS MONTANA — $375,543 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE INC — $373,750 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CASA INC — $311,875 over 9y, 7.3% of budgetBIG SKY SENIOR SERVICES INC — $283,000 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY — $246,250 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE — $241,250 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC — $184,375 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY — $164,292 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetDISTRICT 7 HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC — $159,375 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG FAMILIES EARLY HEAD START — $125,625 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR BILLINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $68,915 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetVeterans Navigation Network — $45,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - AUSTIN — $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHEAD START INC — $38,196 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBILLINGS FAMILY YMCA INC — $29,306 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYELLOWSTONE BOYS & GIRLS RANCH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAWARE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT35.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Brosovich Family Foundation · Donald & Carol Roberts Foundation in Memory of Virginia K Weston Inc · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Charles M Bair Family Trust · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Billings Community Foundation · Scl Health - Montana · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Otto Bremer Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Yellowstone County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph