Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Southern Cameron County

The UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CAMERON COUNTY's mission is to "improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities to advance the common good".

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHuman Services$929kYouth Development$539kHousing & Shelter$350kHealth$346kArts & Culture$330kEmployment$315kCrime & Legal$258kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $400,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $410,414 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,414 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $343k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROYECTO JUAN DIEGO$50,000
GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE$40,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LOS FRESNOS$40,000
OZANAM CENTER$35,000
TIP OF TEXAS FAMILY OUTREACH$33,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CAMERON COUNTY$32,500
FRIENDSHIP OF WOMEN$30,000
BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN AKA MOODY CLINIC$30,000
CAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$27,000
DERRY ELEMENTARY$20,000
LAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTER$20,000
GARRIGA ELEMENTARY$20,000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE$15,000
GUADALUPE REGIONAL MIDDLE SCHOOL$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $547k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 27%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 27%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $35k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $35k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $40k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $40k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $30k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOME: $30k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $29k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $29k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $29k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $25k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $25k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$4.2M
$0

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LOS FRESNOS EDUCATIONAL & RECREATIO N CLUB INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $376k · revenue +49%
  • BS
    BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $346k · revenue +210%
  • CI
    Communities in Schools of Cameron County
    9× · 2017–2025 · $330k · revenue +73%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Concho Valley Workforce Development Board

    CVWDB was founded to provide policy and program guidance for the workforce development and training programs and operate these programs in a manner that would create sustainable economic opportunities for all residents of the of the 13…

    Employment
    2
    Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

    To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

    Crime & Legal
    3
    Quality Childrens Services

    QCS provides early childhood development and childcare program services to children from underserved and disadvantaged families. The programs are funded by various governmental entities and are located in the counties of Los Angeles Madera…

    Human Services
    4
    Camden Center for Youth Development Inc

    To educate and train troubled youth to become productive citizens

    Crime & Legal
    5
    Child Development Resources of Ventura County Inc

    To provide comprehensive educational opportunities for preschool children from low-income families; to provide alternatives in childcare for children of low-income families; (continued on Schedule O)

    Education
    6
    Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

    The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

    Crime & Legal
    7
    Casa of Williamson County Texas

    CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

    Crime & Legal
    8
    Bridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc

    It is the purpose of the Center to deliver the highest quality childcare, youth and adult development services to lower income families and the growing immigrant population in Bridgehampton and surrounding communities through educational…

    Human Services
    9
    Centro De Ninos Inc

    Our mission is providing quality child care/ child development services in a safe, welcoming atmosphere where children will be encouraged to learn and thrive. our goals are to encourage children to develop their unique talents, retain his/…

    Human Services
    10
    Campbell County Childrens Center

    The Center provides medical treatment, psychological evaluations, counseling, and other support services to children who have been abused physically, secually, mentally, and/or emotionally.

    Youth Development
    11
    Center for Community Advocacy

    Provide Educational Programs, Health Services and Legal Services to Farm Workers at housing sites and throughout the Salinas Valley and promote improved living conditions.

    —
    12
    The Children's Community Development Center Incorporated

    Ccdc's mission is to provide the highest quality educational childcare services to families with children from infancy through their preschool years.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cameron County Children Advocacy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Valley Initiative for Development and Advancement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/14
    Grantees still filing
    10/14
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    San Felipe de Jesus Catholic: $442,500 · OtherSan Felipe de Jesus CatholicTIP of Texas Family Outreach Inc: $332,000 · OtherTIP of Texas Family Outreach IncFriendship of Women Inc: $320,000 · OtherFriendship of Women IncANCIENT FREE & ACCEPTED MASONS OF TEXAS: $258,620 · OtherANCIENT FREE & ACCEPTED MASONS OF TEXASBROWNSVILLE LITERACY CENTER: $180,000 · OtherBROWNSVILLE LITERACY CENTERLAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTER: $163,500 · OtherLAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTERGuadalupe Regional Middle School: $105,000 · OtherVALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT: $135,000 · OtherVALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENTCAMERON WORKS INC: $74,000 · Other+1 more: $50,000 · OtherGood Neighbor Settlement House Inc: $277,000 · Human ServicesGood Neighbor …THE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC: $270,000 · Human ServicesTHE BISHOP ENR…LOS FRESNOS EDUCATIONAL & RECREATIO N CLUB INC: $375,988 · Youth DevelopmentLOS FRESNO…BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $345,500 · HealthBROWNSVIL…Communities in Schools of Cameron County: $330,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD: $260,000 · Housing & ShelterCAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $258,000 · Crime & Legal
    Other$2,060,620Human Services$547,000Youth Development$375,988Health$345,500Arts & Culture$330,000Housing & Shelter$260,000Crime & Legal$258,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS FRESNOS EDUCATIONAL & RECREATIO N CLUB INC: $375,988 over 9y, 18% of budgetBROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $345,500 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetTIP of Texas Family Outreach Inc: $332,000 over 9y, 23% of budgetCommunities in Schools of Cameron County: $330,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetFriendship of Women Inc: $320,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetGood Neighbor Settlement House Inc: $277,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetTHE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC: $270,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD: $260,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $258,000 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetBROWNSVILLE LITERACY CENTER: $180,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetLAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTER: $163,500 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetVALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT: $135,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCAMERON WORKS INC: $74,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINFANT AND FAMILY NUTRITION AGENCY: $50,000 over 2y, 25% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LOS FRESNOS EDUCATIONAL & RECREATIO N CLUB INC ↗
    • Who funds BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED ↗
    • Who funds TIP of Texas Family Outreach Inc ↗
    • Who funds Communities in Schools of Cameron County ↗
    • Who funds Friendship of Women Inc ↗
    • Who funds Good Neighbor Settlement House Inc ↗
    • Who funds THE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD ↗
    • Who funds CAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds BROWNSVILLE LITERACY CENTER ↗
    • Who funds LAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTER ↗
    • Who funds VALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT ↗
    • Who funds CAMERON WORKS INC ↗
    • Who funds INFANT AND FAMILY NUTRITION AGENCY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Brownsville Foundation for Health and EducationTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Brownsville Foundation for Health and Education · Rio Grande Valley Philanthropic Foundation · Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation · Raul Tijerina Jr Foundation · Rotary Club of Brownsville Sunrise Texas USA Inc · The Hws Charitable Foundation Inc · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization United Way of Southern Cameron County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Southern Cameron County. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on United Way of Southern Cameron County’s filings →

      More from the funding graph