Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Southern Cameron County

The UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CAMERON COUNTY's mission is to "improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities to advance the common good".

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CAMERON COUNTY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $400,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $410,414 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,414 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $343k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROYECTO JUAN DIEGO$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LOS FRESNOS$40,000
GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE$40,000
OZANAM CENTER$35,000
TIP OF TEXAS FAMILY OUTREACH$33,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CAMERON COUNTY$32,500
FRIENDSHIP OF WOMEN$30,000
BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN AKA MOODY CLINIC$30,000
CAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$27,000
LAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTER$20,000
DERRY ELEMENTARY$20,000
GARRIGA ELEMENTARY$20,000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE$15,000
GUADALUPE REGIONAL MIDDLE SCHOOL$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $547k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 27%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 27%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $40k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $35k → 23%OZANAM CENTER: $35k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $40k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $40k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOME: $30k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $30k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $29k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $29k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $29k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $25k → 23%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $25k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$4.2M
$0

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LOS FRESNOS EDUCATIONAL & RECREATIO N CLUB INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $376k · revenue +49%
  • BS
    BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $346k · revenue +210%
  • TO
    TIP of Texas Family Outreach Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $332k · revenue +15%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Concho Valley Workforce Development Board

    CVWDB was founded to provide policy and program guidance for the workforce development and training programs and operate these programs in a manner that would create sustainable economic opportunities for all residents of the of the 13…

    Employment
    2
    Camden Center for Youth Development Inc

    To educate and train troubled youth to become productive citizens

    Crime & Legal
    3
    Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

    To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

    Crime & Legal
    4
    Quality Childrens Services

    QCS provides early childhood development and childcare program services to children from underserved and disadvantaged families. The programs are funded by various governmental entities and are located in the counties of Los Angeles Madera…

    Human Services
    5
    Child Development Resources of Ventura County Inc

    To provide comprehensive educational opportunities for preschool children from low-income families; to provide alternatives in childcare for children of low-income families; (continued on Schedule O)

    Education
    6
    Bridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc

    It is the purpose of the Center to deliver the highest quality childcare, youth and adult development services to lower income families and the growing immigrant population in Bridgehampton and surrounding communities through educational…

    Human Services
    7
    Casa of Williamson County Texas

    CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

    Crime & Legal
    8
    The Children's Community Development Center Incorporated

    Ccdc's mission is to provide the highest quality educational childcare services to families with children from infancy through their preschool years.

    9
    Child Development Center of Natrona County

    To provide facilities and personnel for part time care, supervision and guidance of children and provide healthful and developmental opportunities based on need.

    10
    Center for Community Advocacy

    Provide Educational Programs, Health Services and Legal Services to Farm Workers at housing sites and throughout the Salinas Valley and promote improved living conditions.

    11
    Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

    The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

    Crime & Legal
    12
    Community Early Childhood Center

    The center's primary function is to provide day care to children.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cameron County Children Advocacy Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Valley Initiative for Development and Advancement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    5
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/14
    Grantees still filing
    11/14
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    San Felipe de Jesus Catholic — $442,500 · OtherSan Felipe de Jesus CatholicTIP of Texas Family Outreach Inc — $332,000 · OtherTIP of Texas Family Outreach IncFriendship of Women Inc — $320,000 · OtherFriendship of Women IncANCIENT FREE & ACCEPTED MASONS OF TEXAS — $258,620 · OtherANCIENT FREE & ACCEPTED MASONS OF TEXASBROWNSVILLE LITERACY CENTER — $180,000 · OtherBROWNSVILLE LITERACY CENTERLAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTER — $163,500 · OtherLAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTERGuadalupe Regional Middle School — $105,000 · OtherVALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT — $135,000 · OtherVALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENTCAMERON WORKS INC — $74,000 · Other+1 more — $50,000 · OtherGood Neighbor Settlement House Inc — $277,000 · Human ServicesGood Neighbor …THE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC — $270,000 · Human ServicesTHE BISHOP ENR…LOS FRESNOS EDUCATIONAL & RECREATIO N CLUB INC — $375,988 · Youth DevelopmentLOS FRESNO…BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED — $345,500 · HealthBROWNSVIL…Communities in Schools of Cameron County — $330,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD — $260,000 · Housing & ShelterCAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $258,000 · Crime & Legal
    Other$2,060,620Human Services$547,000Youth Development$375,988Health$345,500Arts & Culture$330,000Housing & Shelter$260,000Crime & Legal$258,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOS FRESNOS EDUCATIONAL & RECREATIO N CLUB INC — $375,988 over 9y, 18% of budgetBROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED — $345,500 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetTIP of Texas Family Outreach Inc — $332,000 over 9y, 23% of budgetCommunities in Schools of Cameron County — $330,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetFriendship of Women Inc — $320,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetGood Neighbor Settlement House Inc — $277,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetTHE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC — $270,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD — $260,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $258,000 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetBROWNSVILLE LITERACY CENTER — $180,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetLAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTER — $163,500 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetVALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT — $135,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCAMERON WORKS INC — $74,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINFANT AND FAMILY NUTRITION AGENCY — $50,000 over 2y, 25% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LOS FRESNOS EDUCATIONAL & RECREATIO N CLUB INC
    • Who funds BROWNSVILLE SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INCORPORATED
    • Who funds TIP of Texas Family Outreach Inc
    • Who funds Communities in Schools of Cameron County
    • Who funds Friendship of Women Inc
    • Who funds Good Neighbor Settlement House Inc
    • Who funds THE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC
    • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD
    • Who funds CAMERON COUNTY CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    • Who funds BROWNSVILLE LITERACY CENTER
    • Who funds LAGUNA MADRE YOUTH CENTER
    • Who funds VALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT
    • Who funds CAMERON WORKS INC
    • Who funds INFANT AND FAMILY NUTRITION AGENCY

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Brownsville Foundation for Health and EducationTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Brownsville Foundation for Health and Education · Rio Grande Valley Philanthropic Foundation · Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation · Raul Tijerina Jr Foundation · Rotary Club of Brownsville Sunrise Texas USA Inc · The Hws Charitable Foundation Inc · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization United Way of Southern Cameron County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph