· Public charity
United Way of Southeast Missouri Inc
Education - to fund programs that allow children in our community to have the assets and skills necessary to be successful in school and the opportunity to become self sufficient and productive members of society.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $265,878 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $305,755 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,877 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $216k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $33,676 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $33,676 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF SEMO | $28,864 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $28,864 |
| SAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN | $22,129 |
| ONE CITY WORK LIFE | $14,432 |
| REGIONAL FAMILY CRISIS CENTER | $14,432 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $14,432 |
| YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION CO | $14,432 |
| APPLE | $11,509 |
| VOICES FOR CHILDREN | $9,621 |
| SEMO AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $9,621 |
| LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES | $9,621 |
| OAKS OF JACKSON | $9,621 |
| FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT | $5,772 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $383k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC8× · 2017–2024 · $857k · revenue +12%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI9× · 2017–2025 · $401k · revenue +35%
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI9× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +149%
Funded once
- BOBOARD OF DIRECTORS STREET LEVEL CAPE GIRARDEAU INCone grant, 2024 · $12k
- SASEMO ALLIANCE FOR DISABILITY INDEPENDENCE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +4%
- SJST JAMES AME CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The program provides organization structure, leadership and training for community volunteers who serve as court appointed special advocates(casa) for agbused and neglected children in south central missouri.
To decrease the incidence of domestic violence and sexual assault in saline county, missouri, through community awareness, counseling, shelter, direct services and support groups.
Recruit, train and support community volunteers who assist the court in protecting the best interests of abused and neglected children in southwest missouri.
To provide a refuge shelter for abused women and their children; provide legal advocacy for the residents; sponsor public awareness and educational programs and events regarding family violence; train workers and volunteers to deal with…
To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…
Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…
Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.
To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
Child respite and child abuse prevention.
To offer a christ centered way out of a seemingly hopeless situation for victims of domestic violence.
Missouri court appointed special advocate association advocates for the best interest of abused and neglected children by promoting and supporting the development, growth and continuation of quality court appointed special advocate…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Southeast Missouri Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jackson Senior Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity International Cape Area HFH ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST MISSOURI AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE MISSOURI HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR ONE MORE ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE MISSION INN - MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds BOARD OF DIRECTORS STREET LEVEL CAPE GIRARDEAU INC ↗
- Who funds SEMO ALLIANCE FOR DISABILITY INDEPENDENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI VALLEY THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Southeast Missouri Food Bank Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Southeast Missouri Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.