Missouri · Nonprofit
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC (Missouri) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $123,299 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC ($116,074). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,796 civil rights nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,796 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- United Way of the Ozarks Incshared funders
- Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Returnportfolio match
- National Court Appointed Special Advocate Associationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2019 49% · 2020 64% · 2021 68% · 2022 59% · 2023 65% · 2024 66%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
84% of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $17k → $12k.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 99% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC's grant income comes from Missouri funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- United Way of the Ozarks Incshared fundersMO · backs 4 organizations that share your funders
- Kappa Alpha Theta Fraternity Group Returnportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Court Appointed Special Advocate Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- California Court Appointed Special Advocate Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Texas Casa Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kappa Alpha Theta Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kentucky Casa Network Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Illinois Association of Court Appointed Special Advocatesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Colorado CASA Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Pennsylvania Casa Association Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Missouri
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
76% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC?
- COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC (Missouri) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $123,299 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC ($116,074). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $123,299 in grants to COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC?
- UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC is the largest funder on record, with $116,074 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST MISSOURI INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing