· Public charity
United Way of Southeast Ark Inc
Fund raising and agency allocations
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k7 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $316k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $537k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRANT COUNTY | $116,656 |
| SOUTHEAST ARK BEHAVORIAL HLTH CARE | $86,000 |
| JENKINS MEM CHILDRENS CENTER | $81,300 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JEFF COUNTY | $75,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $70,000 |
| NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR | $58,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $50,000 |
| COMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSAL ABUSE | $47,500 |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY 4-H CLUB | $44,000 |
| VOICES FOR CHILDRREN | $38,350 |
| JENKINS MEM SKILLED WORKSHOP | $34,100 |
| ACCESS | $33,000 |
| YOUTH PARTNERS | $27,000 |
| RETIRED SENIOR VOL PROGRAM | $24,000 |
| REYNOLDS CENTER | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGRANT COUNTY UNIFIED COMM RESOURCE COUNCIL INC3× · 2017–2020 · $363k · revenue +109% · 32% of their budget
- BGBoys & Girls Club of Jefferson County3× · 2017–2020 · $225k · revenue +424% · 41% of their budget
- NTNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC3× · 2017–2020 · $170k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +38%
- SCSTUTTGART CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $24k · revenue +187%
- UWUnited Way of Southeast Ark Incone grant, 2020 · $24k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.
Child abuse victim assistance
The northeast arkansas children's advocacy center provides a child appropriate, safe setting for children to tell their story of abuse.
Provide Emergency services, services include food, clothing, utility payment assistance, rental assistance, school supplies, infant care and medical assistance for 10442 individuals
The organization and its volunteers served as advocates for abused and neglected children. the nationwide organization has helped more than two million children.
Advocacy for abused and neglectedchildren
To nourish northwest arkansas communities by feeding hungry people through partnerships with other hunger relief organizations.
To provide comprehensive and coordinated programs for the elderly in counties of arkansas and oklahoma.
Advocacy for abused and neglected children
Coordinating agency for abused children
Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance
To provide trained advocates to stand up for the rights of abused or neglected children in polk, sevier, & montgomery counties in arkansas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Area Agency On Aging of Southeast Ar Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stuttgart Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRANT COUNTY UNIFIED COMM RESOURCE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds JENKINS MEMORIAL CENTER & JENKINS INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Jefferson County ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDRENCOURT APPOINTED SPEC ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH PARTNERS OF PINE BLUFF- JEFFERSON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PINE BLUFF ↗
- Who funds STUTTGART CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds United Way of Southeast Ark Inc ↗
- Who funds AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF SOUTHEAST AR INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL STATE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Harold S Seabrook Tr · Howard Poteet Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Southeast Ark Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.