· Private foundation
Harold S Seabrook Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR | $10,000 |
| YOUTH PARTNERS OF PINE BLUFF - | $7,927 |
| CASA | $7,000 |
| ARTS AND SCIENCE CENTER | $7,000 |
| SOAR | $7,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,903 |
| DEPAUL USA | $6,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| WHITE HALL FOOD PANTRY | $3,855 |
| SOUTHEAST ARK BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE | $2,400 |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $2,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $1,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NTNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC9× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +6%
- VFVOICES FOR CHILDRENCOURT APPOINTED SPEC ADVOCATES7× · 2017–2023 · $33k · revenue +29%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY5× · 2019–2025 · $28k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- SASOUTHEAST ARK COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $12k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- TFTAYLOR FIELD PRESERVATION FUND INCone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocacy for abused and neglected children
The mission of the humane society of jefferson county is to improve the lives of animals in need through compassionate care, adoption, advocacy and education while also inspiring humane communities that foster kindness and respect for all.
Create a safe environment for children by preventing and responding to child abuse.
To provide simple but adequate housing for the working poor.
The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.
Seeking to put gods love in action by bringing people together to build homes for those in need
To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.
Affordable housing for low income families.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.
Pulaski County Friends of CASA, Inc. develops and supports a court-sanctioned community-based program that provides trained and supervised volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children involved in juvenile…
Recruit, train and support community volunteers who assist the court in protecting the best interests of abused and neglected children in southwest missouri.
To provide a child-friendly, home environment in a safe and natural setting while child abuse victims and their non-offending family members/guardians can receive comprehensive and coordinated services from the agencies comprising the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Natural State Council and the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Club of Jefferson County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDRENCOURT APPOINTED SPEC ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Jefferson County ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PINE BLUFF ↗
- Who funds NATURAL STATE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds PINE BLUFF DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds GFPB Inc ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds TAYLOR FIELD PRESERVATION FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Southeast Ark Inc · Trotter Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Howard Poteet Foundation · Simmons First Foundation Inc · The Kline Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harold S Seabrook Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Harold S Seabrook Tr?
Find your warmest path to Harold S Seabrook Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.