Skip to content
United Way of Pitt County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Pitt County Inc

The united way of pitt county, inc.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$499kEducation$382kHousing & Shelter$265kYouth Development$142kPhilanthropy$85kReligion$78kEmployment$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $112,310, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,512,348 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,400,038 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $106k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$802k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR FAMILY VIOLENCE$38,000
COMMUNITY CROSSROADS CENTER$35,000
PITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$32,500
NORTH CAROLINA 211$6,810
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $301k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHURCHES OUTREACH NETWORK: $26k → 20%Churches Outreach Network: $25k → 20%CHURCHES OUTREACH NETWORK: $6k → 20%Pitt County Council on Aging: $35k → 20%PITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $33k → 20%Pitt County Council on Aging: $32k → 20%Ctr For Family Violence Prev: $30k → 20%PITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $29k → 20%PITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $27k → 20%PITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $23k → 20%Pitt County Council on Aging: $23k → 20%American Red Cross: $13k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$1.4M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+45%

Still filing today

88%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The Greenville Community Shelters
    7× · 2019–2025 · $265k · revenue +156%
  • PC
    PITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $201k · revenue +17%
  • THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $165k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORTH PITT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $44k
  • PC
    PORT CITY COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • BH
    Building Hope Community Life Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
2
Community Industry Value Interactionist League

NC CIVIL is a nonprofit community impact organization that develops grassroots approaches to structural disparities. Our mission is to increase resident involvement, improve organization of resources, and help institutions partner…

Youth Development
3
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights
4
Onslow County Partnership for Children

When they have challenges, we connect all children and their families to programs and resources that provide opportunities and hope.

Education
5
Place of Possibilities Inc

To create and support programs that offer literacy, health awareness and job training to impoverished counties of northeastern North Carolina.

Human Services
6
Rebuilding Together Pitt County Nc Inc

To provide critical home repairs, accessibility modifications, and safety upgrades for low-income homeowners in Pitt County. The Organization serves the elderly, people living with disabilities, veterans, and multi-generational families in…

Housing & Shelter
7
North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc

To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.

Health
8
United Way of Coastal Carolina Inc

The united way of coastal carolina, inc. strives to meet the current and emerging human needs in craven, carteret, jones, and pamlico counties by mobilizing the resources of community organizations, agencies, recipients, and volunteers.

Philanthropy
9
Carolina Collaborative Prep

Carolina collaborative prep (ccp) is a non-profit academic center that serves students in grades 3-12 with learning differences, empowering them to thrive in school and in life.

Education
10
Nc Local Inc

Expands local news across North Carolina

Civil Rights
11
United Way of Pitt County Inc

The united way of pitt county, inc. (uwpc) is a nonprofit entity located in eastern north carolina. uwpc is a volunteer-driven organization that seeks to impact the greater pitt county community by focusing on the keys to a good life -…

—
12
Durham's Partnership for Children

To ensure every child in durham enters school ready to succeed, we lead community strategies for children birth to 5, and their families that promote healthy development and learning and echance access to high quality care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of North Carolina; the most unlike its peers is Operation Sunshine Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $164,625 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONREAL CRISIS INTERVENTION INC: $131,463 · OtherREAL CRISIS INTERVENTION INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN: $117,619 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAINLIFE of North Carolina: $69,528 · OtherLIFE of North CarolinaNORTH PITT HIGH SCHOOL: $43,601 · OtherNORTH PITT HIGH SCHOOLParents for Public Schools of Pitt County Inc: $22,237 · Other+6 more: $66,343 · Other+6 morePITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $201,301 · Human ServicesPITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING IN…Center for Family Violence Prevention: $160,388 · Human ServicesCenter for Family Violence Prev…Churches Outreach Network: $57,600 · Human ServicesChurches Outreach Network+2 more: $26,057 · Human Services+2 moreThe Greenville Community Shelters: $265,088 · Housing & ShelterThe Greenville Comm…PITT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR PROGRESS INC: $70,000 · EducationPITT COUNT…KIDS READ NOW INC: $69,348 · EducationKIDS READ …MARTIN PITT PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $12,343 · EducationMARTIN PIT…UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $54,924 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $17,381 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $13,004 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $11,430 · Food & NutritionJesus Others & You Inc: $5,719 · Food & Nutrition
Other$615,416Human Services$445,346Housing & Shelter$265,088Education$151,691Philanthropy$85,309Food & Nutrition$17,149

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Greenville Community Shelters: $265,088 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetPITT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $201,301 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $164,625 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for Family Violence Prevention: $160,388 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetREAL CRISIS INTERVENTION INC: $131,463 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN: $117,619 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPITT COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR PROGRESS INC: $70,000 over 2y, 87% of budgetLIFE of North Carolina: $69,528 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetKIDS READ NOW INC: $69,348 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetChurches Outreach Network: $57,600 over 3y, 14% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $54,924 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetParents for Public Schools of Pitt County Inc: $22,237 over 3y, 13% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $17,381 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBuilding Hope Community Life Center Inc: $13,519 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $13,004 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,538 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN PITT PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $12,343 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $11,430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Sunshine Inc: $10,848 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC: $7,742 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJesus Others & You Inc: $5,719 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University Health Sys…James J & Mamie Richa…Eddie and Jo Allison …Mrcharity IncW Russell and Patrici…North Carolina Commun…Mildred Sheffield Wel…Food Bank of Central …The Cannon Foundation…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation IncNC24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc · James J & Mamie Richardson Perkins Memorial Fund - C/O Bank of America · Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · Mrcharity Inc · W Russell and Patricia Davis Duke Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Mildred Sheffield Wells Char Trust · Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Pitt County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Pitt County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Pitt County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home