Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Otter Tail & Wadena Counties Inc

To improve the lives in otter tail & wadena counties by mobilizing the caring powers in our communities.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$258kCrime & Legal$242kFood & Nutrition$172kPhilanthropy$80kYouth Development$58kEducation$34kScience & Tech$22kHealth$6k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $51,394, the rows itemized in this filing. The $186,816 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $135,422 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$18,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOMEPLACE SAFE$20,181
SALVATION ARMY$18,750
NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK$12,463
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 9%FERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA: $6k → 9%A PLACE TO BELONG: $6k → 9%FERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$714k · 10 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$714k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-12%

Still filing today

60%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SOMEPLACE SAFE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $226k · revenue +101%
  • NC
    NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +9%
  • LS
    LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST MINNESOTA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $16k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • CC
    CARING CONNECTIONS FAMILY ADVOCACY
    one grant, 2019 · $42k
  • OB
    OTTO BREMER TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue -85%
  • FF
    FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Becker County United Way

To maximize community resources and mobilize the caring power to help people in need in Becker County, MN.

Philanthropy
2
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Northwest Indiana Inc

To provide food to various charitable organizations and needy individuals in northwest indiana.

Food & Nutrition
4
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Siouxland

Establish relationships between siouxland youth and mature, responsible screened adult volunteers.

—
5
Northwoods Partners

To provide resources that promote independence and healthy aging.

Human Services
6
Guiding Star Wakota

Guiding star wakota provides women and families conpassionate care, empowering them to choose life and supporting them on the parenting journey.

—
7
Association of Minnesota Counties

The association of minnesota counties is a voluntary non-partisan statewide organization that assists the state's 87 counties in providing effective county governance to the people of minnesota.

—
8
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
9
Goodwill Industries of Northern Michigan Inc

We bring food to neighbors, help vulnerable people find home, and provide empowering employment through our community-supported social enterprise and collaborative partnerships.the 2023 990 was for 10/1-12/31/23 due to an accounting period…

Employment
10
Western South Dakota Senior Services Inc

To assist seniors in maintaining optimal health, independence, and socialization, deferring admission to long term care facilities and improving their quality of life.

—
11
South Metro Human Services

Radias health is a non-profit mental health & substance use disorders services organization customizing community based services through the integration of knowledge, compassion, and collaboration. we are committed to being an inclusive,…

Human Services
12
Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency Inc

To improve the quality of life by providing resources and services within our communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fergus Falls Area Family Ymca; the most unlike its peers is Otto Bremer Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOMEPLACE SAFE: $225,924 · OtherSOMEPLACE SAFESALVATION ARMY: $160,020 · OtherSALVATION ARMYNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $138,208 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INCFERGUS FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS ISD#544: $52,720 · OtherFERGUS FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS ISD#544CARING CONNECTIONS FAMILY ADVOCACY: $41,600 · OtherCARING CONNECTIONS FAMILY ADVOCACYCALVALRY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $34,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DETROIT LAKES: $28,500 · Other+2 more: $27,275 · OtherWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $80,255 · PhilanthropyWEST CENTRAL …OTTO BREMER TRUST: $21,873 · PhilanthropyOTTO BREMER T…KINSHIP OF THE PERHAM AREA: $29,150 · Youth DevelopmentFERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA: $18,160 · Human ServicesA PLACE TO BELONG: $6,000 · Human ServicesFERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATI: $7,500 · Education
Other$708,247Philanthropy$102,128Youth Development$29,150Human Services$24,160Education$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOMEPLACE SAFE: $225,924 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $138,208 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $80,255 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetKINSHIP OF THE PERHAM AREA: $29,150 over 4y, 16% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DETROIT LAKES: $28,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOTTO BREMER TRUST: $21,873 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA: $18,160 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST MINNESOTA: $15,700 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATI: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetA PLACE TO BELONG: $6,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOMEPLACE SAFE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP OF THE PERHAM AREA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DETROIT LAKES ↗
  • Who funds OTTO BREMER TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATI ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE TO BELONG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Central InitiativeMN21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Central Initiative · Otto Bremer Trust · Otter Tail Power Company Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · The Barry Foundation · Communitygiving · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Otter Tail & Wadena Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Otter Tail & Wadena Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Otter Tail & Wadena Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph