Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Northeastern South Dakota Inc

The mission of the United Way of Northeastern South Dakota (United Way) is to improve our region by mobilizing the caring power of communities for every person in northeastern South Dakota.

$541k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$124k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.5MYouth Development$1.1MHealth$581kFood & Nutrition$341kEducation$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kHousing & Shelter$5kEmployment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $484,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $540,871 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $56,271 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $331k
$22,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Aberdeen Family YMCA$124,000
Safe Harbor$110,000
Boys & Girls Club of Aberdeen$96,600
The Salvation Army$42,000
SPURS$33,000
CASSP$22,500
Aberdeen Area Senior Center$18,000
Tiger Post$15,000
YAPA$10,000
Delta Dental of SD Foundation$6,000
East River Legal Services$4,000
KO Lee Library$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $109k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Tiger Post: $15k → 10%Tiger Post: $15k → 10%Ipswich Tiger Post: $14k → 10%Tiger Post: $9k → 10%Tiger Post: $9k → 10%Tiger Post: $6k → 10%Ipswich Tiger Post: $6k → 10%Ipswich Tiger Post: $6k → 10%Ipswich Tiger Post: $6k → 10%Senior Companions: $800 → 9%Senior Companies: $800 → 9%Aberdeen Area Senior Center: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 21 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
7

Total granted

$4.5M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+2%

Still filing today

71%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentEmploymentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    Aberdeen Family YMCA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +28%
  • ST
    SPURS Therapeutic Riding Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $277k · revenue +102%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • AS
    Aberdeen Senior Center Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • AI
    Area IV Senior Citizen Planning Council
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • AS
    Avera St Luke's
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
2
St Luke's Home

St. Luke's Home and its assisted living facility, Park Avenue Villa, exist to provide a continuum of quality care to God's people, creating a compassionate, comfortable, and family oriented atmosphere, striving to enhance the dignity and…

Human Services
3
Northwood Deaconess Health Center

Serve as a local access to a full range of health care services. continue as a leader in primary care for the whole family, in care of the elderly, and in emergency services. Function as a focal point for health education and wellness.

Health
4
Sioux Center Health

Bring hope, health and healing to life.

—
5
Aberdeen Development Corporation

Recruit, retain, expand, and provide entrepreneurial support to enhance economic opportunity in Aberdeen and our surrounding region.

—
6
Lutheran Sunset Home

Provide long-term skilled nursing care services to individuals through its skilled nursing facility. Provide housing and assistance with daily living to seniors through its assisted living units.

—
7
Avera at Home

Avera is a health ministry rooted in the Gospel. Our mission is to make a positive impact in the lives and health of persons and communities by providing quality services guided by Christian values.

Health
8
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

—
9
Missouri Slope Lutheran Care Center Inc

Founded in Christian faith, we enrich lives with love and compassion.

Health
10
Sacred Heart Health Services

Avera is a health ministry rooted in the Gospel. Our mission is to make a positive impact in the lives and health of persons and communities by providing quality services guided by Christian values.

Health
11
St Gerard's Community of Care

The mission of this Catholic health care facility, St. Gerard's Community of Care, is to strive to provide the residents with loving and caring service based on Christ's mission of love and compassion in accordance with gospel values and…

—
12
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota; the most unlike its peers is Ipswich Tiger Post Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Aberdeen Family YMCA: $1,119,310 · OtherAberdeen Family YMCASafe Harbor: $886,744 · OtherSafe HarborBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INC: $830,690 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INCCity of Aberdeen Parks and Recreation Department: $268,445 · OtherCity of Aberdeen Parks and Recreation DepartmentTHE SALVATION ARMY: $210,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $204,265 · OtherCASSP: $150,786 · Other+11 more: $387,342 · Other+11 moreSPURS Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $277,300 · HealthNortheastern Mental Health Center: $41,500 · Health+2 more: $16,000 · HealthIpswich Tiger Post Community Center: $87,500 · Human ServicesAberdeen Senior Center Inc: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,600 · Human ServicesPresentation College: $8,400 · EducationGIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONS: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentCornerstones Career Learning Center: $4,000 · EmploymentEast River Legal Services Corporation: $4,000 · Crime & LegalDTOM 220 FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,057,582Health$334,800Human Services$109,100Education$8,400Youth Development$4,000Employment$4,000Crime & Legal$4,000Public Benefit$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAberdeen Family YMCA: $1,119,310 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetSafe Harbor: $886,744 over 9y, 21% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INC: $830,690 over 9y, 7.5% of budgetSPURS Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $277,300 over 9y, 16% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ABERDEEN AREA CHILDR AND ADOLESCENT SERVICE SYSTEM: $117,400 over 4y, 94% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $98,925 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIpswich Tiger Post Community Center: $87,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetHELPLINE CENTER INC: $85,266 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNortheastern Mental Health Center: $41,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSIOUX COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAvera St Luke's: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresentation College: $8,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA DENTAL OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHabitat for Humanity International Inc DBA Hub Area Habitat for Humanity: $5,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetBethesda Home of Aberdeen Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstones Career Learning Center: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEast River Legal Services Corporation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDTOM 220 FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Aberdeen Family YMCA ↗
  • Who funds Safe Harbor ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABERDEEN AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPURS Therapeutic Riding Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ABERDEEN AREA CHILDR AND ADOLESCENT SERVICE SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds Ipswich Tiger Post Community Center ↗
  • Who funds HELPLINE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Northeastern Mental Health Center ↗
  • Who funds Aberdeen Senior Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Avera St Luke's ↗
  • Who funds Presentation College ↗
  • Who funds DELTA DENTAL OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity International Inc DBA Hub Area Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds Bethesda Home of Aberdeen Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONS ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstones Career Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds East River Legal Services Corporation ↗
  • Who funds DTOM 220 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of NE SD FoundationSD26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of NE SD Foundation · South Dakota Community Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Avera Health · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · Sioux Empire United Way Inc · Sanford Group Return · Brookings Area United Way · Watertown Area United Way Inc · Tom & Danielle Aman Foundation · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Northeastern South Dakota Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Northeastern South Dakota Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Northeastern South Dakota’s filings →

    More from the funding graph