Skip to content
United Way of North Talladega County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of North Talladega County Inc

The mission of the united way of north talladega county is to encourage public giving from individuals, businesses and other organizations in order to make contributions to other 501c(3) organizations located in our community to enhance and improve the quality of life and well-being in the areas of income, health and education.

$94k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$210kFood & Nutrition$134kYouth Development$100kCrime & Legal$53kEducation$25kHealth$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kCommunity Improvement$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $75,083, the rows itemized in this filing. The $94,333 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$6,667
Median grant
1
States reached
$389k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN HOUSE$12,000
FIRST FAMILY SERVICES$10,916
LINCOLN FOOD PANTRY$8,000
PALMER PLACE$7,500
RED DOOR KITCHEN$6,667
BOY SCOUTS$6,600
GIRL SCOUTS NO CENTRAL AL$6,000
ALABAMA EASTER SEALS SOCIETY$6,000
BOTS AND GIRLS CLUB$6,000
THE ARC OF NORTH TALLADEGA CO$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PALMER PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY: $12k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 7%PALMER PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY: $10k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 7%PALMER PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY: $9k → 18%PALMER PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY: $9k → 18%PALMER PLACE: $8k → 18%PALMER PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY: $7k → 18%PALMER PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$549k · 13 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$549k
$35k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    Samaritan House
    8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +63%
  • TC
    TALLADEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +18% · 44% of their budget
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • TC
    TALLADEGA COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CP
    CEREBRAL PALSY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
2
The Arc of South Talladega County

Support services for the mentally challenged of south talladega county in alabama.

Human Services
3
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
4
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
5
Family Services of North Alabama

Strengthens families and serve sexual assault victims

Human Services
6
Northwest Alabama Corrections for Youth Inc

The corporation provides a camp and temporary living facility for juveniles placed by the court system. counseling, monitoring and instruction services were provided to approximately 150 youthful offenders in the last fiscal year.

Crime & Legal
7
Reclaimed for Good Inc
Human Services
8
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Alabama Inc

The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.

Youth Development
9
Lighthouse of Tallapoosa County in

Rehabilitation facility for alcoholics

Health
10
Alabama Restaurant & Hospitality Association Foundation
—
11
Southeast Alabama Child Advocacy Center

Established to serve as an advocate of children & to reduce the trauma & anxiety of victims of child abuse by providing coordinated multi- disciplinary & human approach to the investigation & interviewing process.

Human Services
12
Boys and Girls of North Central Alabama Inc

Provide recreational activities, athletic programs, various educational and enrichment programs to members and other youth with an emphasis on the under privileged.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arc of North Talladega County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Samaritan House: $77,976 · OtherSamaritan HouseTALLADEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $70,570 · OtherTALLADEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INCARC OF NORTH TALLADEGA COUNTY INC: $35,100 · OtherARC OF NORTH TALLADEGA COUNTY INCGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $26,700 · OtherGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICATALLADEGA COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherTALLADEGA COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCRECREATION RANCH INC: $18,900 · OtherRECREATION RANCH INCCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $13,600 · Other+2 more: $10,008 · OtherTALLADEGAS RED DOOR KITCHEN: $121,272 · Food & NutritionTALLADEGAS RED DOOR KITCHE…THE LINCOLN FOOD PANTRY INC: $13,004 · Food & NutritionTHE LINCOLN FOOD PANTRY IN…TALLADEGA COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $60,544 · Human ServicesTALLADEGA COUNT…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $19,608 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $62,283 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS…GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $11,340 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF…EASTER SEALS ALABAMA INC: $17,754 · Health
Other$277,854Food & Nutrition$134,276Human Services$80,152Youth Development$73,623Health$17,754

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTALLADEGAS RED DOOR KITCHEN: $121,272 over 7y, 19% of budgetSamaritan House: $77,976 over 8y, 12% of budgetTALLADEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $70,570 over 8y, 44% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $62,283 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTALLADEGA COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $60,544 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetARC OF NORTH TALLADEGA COUNTY INC: $35,100 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $26,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $19,608 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRECREATION RANCH INC: $18,900 over 3y, 24% of budgetEASTER SEALS ALABAMA INC: $17,754 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE LINCOLN FOOD PANTRY INC: $13,004 over 2y, 15% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $11,340 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundat…Amazonsmile Foundation
Alabama Power Foundation IncAL17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of North Talladega County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of North Talladega County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of North Talladega County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home