· Public charity
United Way of North Talladega County Inc
The mission of the united way of north talladega county is to encourage public giving from individuals, businesses and other organizations in order to make contributions to other 501c(3) organizations located in our community to enhance and improve the quality of life and well-being in the areas of income, health and education.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of UNITED WAY OF NORTH TALLADEGA COUNTY INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $75,083 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $94,333 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAMARITAN HOUSE | $12,000 |
| FIRST FAMILY SERVICES | $10,916 |
| LINCOLN FOOD PANTRY | $8,000 |
| PALMER PLACE | $7,500 |
| RED DOOR KITCHEN | $6,667 |
| BOY SCOUTS | $6,600 |
| BOTS AND GIRLS CLUB | $6,000 |
| ALABAMA EASTER SEALS SOCIETY | $6,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS NO CENTRAL AL | $6,000 |
| THE ARC OF NORTH TALLADEGA CO | $5,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSamaritan House8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +63%
- TCTALLADEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +18% · 44% of their budget
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC7× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- TCTALLADEGA COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $25k
- CPCEREBRAL PALSYone grant, 2017 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Social services
Support services for the mentally challenged of south talladega county in alabama.
Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.
The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.
Strengthens families and serve sexual assault victims
The corporation provides a camp and temporary living facility for juveniles placed by the court system. counseling, monitoring and instruction services were provided to approximately 150 youthful offenders in the last fiscal year.
The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.
Rehabilitation facility for alcoholics
Established to serve as an advocate of children & to reduce the trauma & anxiety of victims of child abuse by providing coordinated multi- disciplinary & human approach to the investigation & interviewing process.
Provide recreational activities, athletic programs, various educational and enrichment programs to members and other youth with an emphasis on the under privileged.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arc of North Talladega County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TALLADEGAS RED DOOR KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds Samaritan House ↗
- Who funds TALLADEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds TALLADEGA COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARC OF NORTH TALLADEGA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds RECREATION RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds THE LINCOLN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of North Talladega County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.