Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Muscatine Iowa

Improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the muscatine community to advance the common good.

$754k
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$108k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$1.7MCommunity Improvement$757kEducation$451kCrime & Legal$298kHealth$248kYouth Development$132kHousing & Shelter$77kEmployment$69kOther$0
02FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $459,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $754,123 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $295,123 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $264k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$934k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION$108,315
MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y$94,000
CROSSROADS INC$61,395
FLICKLINGER LEARNING CENTER$45,000
FAMILY RESOURCES$29,950
LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA$25,000
IOWA JAG$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
ISU EXTENSION$16,000
TRINITY HEALTHCARE$12,500
REBUILDING TOGETHER$11,250
IMAGINATION LIBRARY$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS QC$5,590
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILIES INC: $5k → 8%FAMILIES INC: $3k → 8%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $94k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $91k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $89k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $88k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $80k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $72k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $72k → 12%FLICKLINGER LEARNING CENTER: $63k → 12%FLICKLINGER LEARNING CENTER: $62k → 12%FLICKLINGER LEARNING CENTER: $55k → 12%FLICKLINGER LEARNING CENTER: $54k → 12%FLICKLINGER LEARNING CENTER: $52k → 12%FLICKLINGER LEARNING CENTER: $50k → 12%FLICKLINGER LEARNING CENTER: $45k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $30k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $30k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $24k → 12%DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of United Way of Muscatine Iowa’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in IA; by stated purpose, 83%.

United Way of Muscatine Iowalessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 21 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$3.7M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+44%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $757k · revenue +10%
  • UH
    UNITY HEALTHCARE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $248k · revenue +47%
  • IJ
    IOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $63k · revenue +275%

Funded once

  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE HEARTLAND
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +13%
  • TD
    THE DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iowa Center for Children's Justice

ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services. ICCJ provides education and legal services on a reduced fee or at no charge based on the ability to pay.

Civil Rights
2
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
3
Mid-Iowa Workshops Inc

To provide employment for the disabled.

Employment
4
Iowa Legal Aid

To strengthen iowa's families and communities by providing free legal help that protects housing, safety, and income-and empowers people to build stable, independent lives. with 10 offices serving all 99 iowa counties, iowa legal aid helps…

Crime & Legal
5
United Way of Muscatine Iowa

Improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the muscatine community to advance the common good.

—
6
Iowa Association of Community Action Directors

To assist in the provision of a better life for iowa's low-income residents, through assistance to the community action organization located within the state.

—
7
Linn County Advocate Inc

Linn County Advocate, Inc., provides quality legal representation for indigent clients in criminal and juvenile cases at the state court level in Linn, Johnson, Benton, and Jones Counties in the state of Iowa.

—
8
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
9
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

—
10
Iowa Chapter of Children's Advocacy Centers

To promote the development, growth and utilization of childrens advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to better serve Iowas abused and neglected children and their families.

Crime & Legal
11
Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

Human Services
12
Southwest Iowa Families Inc

To enhance the lives of children and their families in southwest iowa by offering family counseling and support programs for families.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Services in Iowa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Flickinger Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $584,550 · Human ServicesMUSCATINE COMMUNITY YFLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $380,167 · Human ServicesFLICKINGER LEARNING CENTERLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $184,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC+2 more: $15,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $380,750 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCES INCSENIOR RESOURCES INC: $369,800 · OtherSENIOR RESOURCES INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $142,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS QC: $62,790 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS QCIMAGINATION LIBRARY: $46,500 · Other+6 more: $145,000 · Other+6 moreMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $756,601 · Community ImprovementMUSCATINE CENTER FOR S…MUSCATINE LEGAL SERVICES: $265,600 · Crime & LegalEVERYCHILD: $32,350 · Crime & LegalUNITY HEALTHCARE: $248,250 · HealthIOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC: $62,500 · Youth DevelopmentILLOWA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $43,000 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSROADS INC: $61,395 · EmploymentREBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC: $26,250 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,164,217Other$1,147,340Community Improvement$756,601Crime & Legal$297,950Health$248,250Youth Development$105,500Employment$61,395Housing & Shelter$26,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $756,601 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $584,550 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $380,750 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetFLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $380,167 over 8y, 38% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCES INC: $369,800 over 6y, 23% of budgetMUSCATINE LEGAL SERVICES: $265,600 over 6y, 35% of budgetUNITY HEALTHCARE: $248,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $184,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC: $62,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS INC: $61,395 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetILLOWA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $43,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetEVERYCHILD: $32,350 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC: $26,250 over 3y, 28% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWA: $26,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE HEARTLAND: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWA: $7,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds UNITY HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLOWA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds EVERYCHILD ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER MUSCATINE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWA ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds THE DIVERSITY SERVICE CENTER OF IOWA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater MuscatineIA34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine · HNI Charitable Foundation · Muscatine Charities Inc · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Quad Cities Community Foundation · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · United Way Quad Cities · Scott County Regional Authority · KENT CORPORATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION fka KENT-STEIN FOUNDATION · New Hope Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Jensen Private Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Muscatine Iowa funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Muscatine Iowa. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $561k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Muscatine Iowa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph