Skip to content
United Way of Morgan County at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Morgan County

Funds distribution

$490k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.9MHealth$1.7MYouth Development$1.3MPhilanthropy$1.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$588kCrime & Legal$560kHousing & Shelter$125kFood & Nutrition$109kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $340k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $138k
$26,583
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENIOR CENTER$83,325
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$55,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$41,250
CRISIS SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA$34,650
FAMILIES & CHILDREN EXPER SEP$32,083
ARC OF MORGAN COUNTY$30,250
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$28,233
MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF NCA$26,583
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION$26,583
PACT$21,450
COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC$21,083
AMERICAN RED CROSS$19,398
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$18,333
MOSAIC$14,667
MORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD$13,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $698k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILIES & CHILDREN EXPER SEP: $79k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $72k → 13%FAMILIES & CHILDREN EXPER SEP: $53k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $46k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 13%CENTER FOR DEVELOP DISABLED: $38k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35k → 13%FAMILIES & CHILDREN EXPER SEP: $33k → 13%FAMILIES & CHILDREN EXPER SEP: $32k → 13%STERRS DAY CARE: $31k → 13%FAMILIES & CHILDREN EXPER SEP: $30k → 13%STERRS DAY CARE: $29k → 13%STERRS DAY CARE: $27k → 13%STERRS DAY CARE: $22k → 13%CENTER FOR DEVELOP DISABLED: $21k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $19k → 13%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $18k → 13%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $17k → 13%CENTER FOR DEVELOP DISABLED: $13k → 13%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $12k → 13%CENTER FOR DEVELOP DISABLED: $12k → 13%STERRS DAY CARE: $9k → 13%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 25 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
3

Total granted

$8.0M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+48%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH ALABAMA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $915k · revenue +28%
  • CS
    Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $514k · revenue +22%
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN MORGAN COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $486k · revenue +20% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • TI
    TERRELL INDUSTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +48%
  • DY
    DECATUR YOUTH SYMPHONY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
2
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
3
Casa of North Alabama

To provide volunteer advocates for abused and neglected children of morgan and limestone counties, helping them find safe and permanent homes.

Human Services
4
Morgan County Humane Society Inc

Operation of animal shelter for the public, adoptions, providing spaying and neutering services,sick and injured services, serving the community

Animals
5
The Arc of South Talladega County

Support services for the mentally challenged of south talladega county in alabama.

Human Services
6
Morgan County Health Council Inc

To provide primary care medical, dental, and behavioral health services to area residents regardless of ability to pay.

Health
7
Delta Childrens Advocacy Center

Delta Childrens Advocacy Centers mission is to respond to child abuse in the Mississippi Delta by serving and nurturing children and non-offending caregivers through a trauma-informed multidisciplinary approach.

Crime & Legal
8
Mobile County Pals

Provide services and support to prevent cruelty and provide shelter to animals

Animals
9
Morgan County Genealogical and Hist
Arts & Culture
10
Moms Inc

To help people who suffer abuse and addiction. we provide residential rehab and sober living. our residents live in our facilities for 3 to 12 months

Health
11
The Arc of Central Alabama Inc

Serving people with intellectual and/or other developmental disabilities and their families.

—
12
Family Crisis Services of Nw Ms

To reduce the trauma of violence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centers for the Developmentally Disabled of North Central Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Faces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $724,375 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $618,567 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $535,339 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc: $513,962 · OtherCrisis Services of North Alabama IncThe Arc of Morgan County: $397,271 · OtherThe Arc of Morgan CountyMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $215,437 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA IN…DECATUR MORGAN CO SENIORS COUNCIL: $126,814 · Other+6 more: $313,445 · Other+6 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $915,116 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNER…VOLUNTEER CENTER OF MORGAN COUNTY: $503,515 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER CENTER OF MORG…UNITED WAY OF MORGAN COUNTY: $323,293 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MORGAN COU…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $446,780 · Human ServicesAmerican National R…FACES: $411,582 · Human ServicesFACESCENTERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $183,632 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR THE DEV…MORGAN COUNTY SYSTEM OF SERVICES I: $135,126 · Human ServicesMORGAN COUNTY SYSTE…Sterrs Day Care Center Inc: $119,382 · Human ServicesSterrs Day Care Cen…HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $86,706 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE VALL…MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN MORGAN COUNTY: $486,195 · HealthMENTAL HEA…COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC OF DECATUR MORGAN COUNTY INC: $289,910 · HealthCOMMUNITY …PARENTS AND CHILDREN TOGETHER: $311,332 · Crime & LegalMORGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $248,783 · Crime & LegalMORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $119,261 · Public Safety & DisasterDECATUR YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $5,322 · Arts & Culture
Other$3,445,210Philanthropy$1,741,924Human Services$1,383,208Health$776,105Crime & Legal$560,115Public Safety & Disaster$119,261Arts & Culture$5,322

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $915,116 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $724,375 over 9y, 13% of budgetCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc: $513,962 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTER OF MORGAN COUNTY: $503,515 over 8y, 62% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN MORGAN COUNTY: $486,195 over 9y, 32% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $446,780 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFACES: $411,582 over 9y, 59% of budgetThe Arc of Morgan County: $397,271 over 9y, 53% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MORGAN COUNTY: $323,293 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetPARENTS AND CHILDREN TOGETHER: $311,332 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC OF DECATUR MORGAN COUNTY INC: $289,910 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $248,783 over 9y, 12% of budgetCENTERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $183,632 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY SYSTEM OF SERVICES I: $135,126 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetDECATUR MORGAN CO SENIORS COUNCIL: $126,814 over 7y, 45% of budgetSterrs Day Care Center Inc: $119,382 over 5y, 22% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $119,261 over 8y, 15% of budgetTENNESSEE VALLEY OUTREACH INC: $86,729 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $86,706 over 6y, 14% of budgetGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $86,647 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL MORGAN COUNTY HFH: $38,417 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTERRELL INDUSTRIES INC: $8,219 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDECATUR YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $5,322 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER OF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN MORGAN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FACES ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of Morgan County ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS AND CHILDREN TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC OF DECATUR MORGAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY SYSTEM OF SERVICES I ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR MORGAN CO SENIORS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Sterrs Day Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE VALLEY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL MORGAN COUNTY HFH ↗
  • Who funds TERRELL INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR YOUTH SYMPHONY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Natl Christian Charit…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Morgan County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Morgan County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Morgan County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home