· Public charity
United Way of Morgan County
Funds distribution
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $340k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $138k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SENIOR CENTER | $83,325 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $55,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $41,250 |
| CRISIS SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA | $34,650 |
| FAMILIES & CHILDREN EXPER SEP | $32,083 |
| ARC OF MORGAN COUNTY | $30,250 |
| CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $28,233 |
| MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION | $26,583 |
| MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF NCA | $26,583 |
| PACT | $21,450 |
| COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC | $21,083 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $19,398 |
| HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY | $18,333 |
| MOSAIC | $14,667 |
| MORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD | $13,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $698k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH ALABAMA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $915k · revenue +28%
- CSCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $514k · revenue +22%
- MHMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN MORGAN COUNTY9× · 2017–2025 · $486k · revenue +20% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $22k
- TITERRELL INDUSTRIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +48%
- DYDECATUR YOUTH SYMPHONY INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Social services
Operation of animal shelter for the public, adoptions, providing spaying and neutering services,sick and injured services, serving the community
To provide primary care medical, dental, and behavioral health services to area residents regardless of ability to pay.
Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.
Support services for the mentally challenged of south talladega county in alabama.
To provide volunteer advocates for abused and neglected children of morgan and limestone counties, helping them find safe and permanent homes.
Community mental health center
To serve those experiencing the effects of poverty by offering opportunities to stabilize their lives through housing, advocacy, support, and paths to self-sufficiency
Provide services and support to prevent cruelty and provide shelter to animals
Strengthens families and serve sexual assault victims
Our Mission: Empowering Families. Securing Futures. Providing Peace of Mind.Our Vision: A world where every family raising a special needs dependent has access to essential planning, lifelong security, and lasting peace of mind.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centers for the Developmentally Disabled of North Central Alabama and the most unlike its peers is Faces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER OF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN MORGAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds FACES ↗
- Who funds The Arc of Morgan County ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MORGAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PARENTS AND CHILDREN TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC OF DECATUR MORGAN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MORGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds MORGAN COUNTY SYSTEM OF SERVICES I ↗
- Who funds DECATUR MORGAN CO SENIORS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Sterrs Day Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE VALLEY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL MORGAN COUNTY HFH ↗
- Who funds TERRELL INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds DECATUR YOUTH SYMPHONY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Morgan County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.