Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of McMinn and Meigs Counties

To build a stronger, caring community by uniting our resources and enhance the human services available in mcminn and meigs counties.

$499k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$131k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MHuman Services$1.0MAnimals$401kYouth Development$342kEducation$248kPublic Safety & Disaster$132kCrime & Legal$120kReligion$119kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $484,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $498,883 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,883 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $342k
$37,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$131,100
GOOD FAITH CLINIC$56,000
TRI-COUNTY CENTER$53,400
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGION-MEIGS$51,500
THE HOPE CENTER$50,000
MCMINN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD$37,500
MCMINN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$31,000
MCMINN COUNTY DEPT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE$25,000
ETOWAH RESCUE SQUAD$15,000
ETOWAH SENIOR CENTER$15,000
GRACE & MERCY MINISTRIES$11,000
TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY: $22k → 15%GRACE & MERCY MINISTRIES: $11k → 15%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 25 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
7

Total granted

$4.3M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
0%

Still filing today

32%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GOOD FAITH CLINIC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $521k · revenue +5% · 75% of their budget
  • TC
    TRI-COUNTY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $518k · revenue +85%
  • CC
    COORDINATED CHARITIES OF ATHENS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $284k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • WA
    WOMEN AT THE WELL
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • MM
    MEIG MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
  • TG
    TABLES GRACE FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
2
Open Arms Care Center

To provide food and other sustanance items to the people in need

—
3
Tri-Area Ministry Food Pantry

Food pantry serving the needs of local residents.

Human Services
4
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
5
Meals On Wheels

Prepare and deliver hot meals to the elderly and disabled 5 days a week.

Human Services
6
Faith Health Center

To provide health care to uninsured and under insured individuals.

—
7
Mccomb Interdenominational Care

Providing a food pantry for the needy in the area.

—
8
Good Samaritan Hunger Center

Provide bags of groceries for in need families on a weekly basis.

Food & Nutrition
9
Operation Compassion of Mercer County Inc

Provide community support to citizens of mercer and surrounding counties. primarily provide meals and groceries to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
10
Orangeburg Calhoun Free Medical Clinic Inc

Provide medical care to individuals that are 200% below the poverty level in a primary care setting. this will include examination, treatment and medication. individuals will be screened before being seen to be sure they meet financial…

Health
11
Crawford County Community Christian Help Center

To provide services to crawford county citizens

Human Services
12
Colton Helping Hands Inc

To provide free food to jobless, homeless and needy.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Full Circle Medical Center for Women; the most unlike its peers is Meigs Decatur Friends of the Librar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $681,870 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE HOPE CENTER: $519,933 · OtherTHE HOPE CENTERTRI-COUNTY CENTER: $517,672 · OtherTRI-COUNTY CENTERMCMINN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $400,952 · OtherMCMINN COUNTY RESCUE SQUADCOORDINATED CHARITIES OF ATHENS: $283,605 · OtherCOORDINATED CHARITIES OF ATHENSMCMINN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $230,500 · OtherMCMINN EDUCATION FOUNDATIONBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REG: $213,699 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGMCMINN COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $141,230 · Other+17 more: $580,970 · Other+17 moreGOOD FAITH CLINIC: $521,200 · HealthGOOD FAITH CLIN…FULL CIRCLE MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN: $73,074 · HealthFULL CIRCLE MED…ETOWAH RESCUE SQUAD: $126,999 · Public Safety & DisasterGRACE AND MERCY MINISTRIES: $42,141 · Human ServicesHelping Hands Ministry: $31,818 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF THE OCOEE REGION: $34,279 · PhilanthropyMEIGS DECATUR FRIENDS OF THE LIBRAR: $10,000 · EducationTENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · Education
Other$3,570,431Health$594,274Public Safety & Disaster$126,999Human Services$73,959Philanthropy$34,279Education$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD FAITH CLINIC: $521,200 over 9y, 75% of budgetTRI-COUNTY CENTER: $517,672 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetCOORDINATED CHARITIES OF ATHENS: $283,605 over 6y, 12% of budgetETOWAH RESCUE SQUAD: $126,999 over 9y, 35% of budgetFULL CIRCLE MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN: $73,074 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetGRACE AND MERCY MINISTRIES: $42,141 over 5y, 15% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE OCOEE REGION: $34,279 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHelping Hands Ministry: $31,818 over 2y, 19% of budgetTENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD FAITH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COORDINATED CHARITIES OF ATHENS ↗
  • Who funds ETOWAH RESCUE SQUAD ↗
  • Who funds FULL CIRCLE MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds GRACE AND MERCY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE OCOEE REGION ↗
  • Who funds Helping Hands Ministry ↗
  • Who funds MEIGS DECATUR FRIENDS OF THE LIBRAR ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Athens Federal FoundationTN20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Athens Federal Foundation · George R Johnson Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of McMinn and Meigs Counties funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of McMinn and Meigs Counties. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of McMinn and Meigs Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph