Skip to content
United Way of Maury County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Maury County Inc

Support of community agencies

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$56kFood & Nutrition$34kYouth Development$5kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $82,819, the rows itemized in this filing. The $132,680 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $49,861 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $71k
$10,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$446k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHT APPLE$20,000
YOUTH VILLAGES$15,500
Individual grant recipient$15,000
IMAGINATION LIBRARY$10,200
THE WELL OUTREACH$10,000
BUILDING BLOCK SCHOOL-ARTS$6,869
Individual grant recipient$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUTH VILLAGES: $16k → 10%SOUTH CENT TN FAM CTR: $10k → 10%YOUTH VILLAGES: $8k → 10%FREEDOM REIGNS RANCH: $7k → 10%YOUTH VILLAGES: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$93k · 3 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$93k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WELL OUTREACH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $44k · revenue +25%
  • YOUTH VILLAGES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $29k · revenue +41%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • NL
    NEW LIFE AUTOMOTIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • CO
    CENTER OF HOPE
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Counseling Center of Middle Tennessee Inc

To provide quality, affordable counseling to families and individuals.

Recreation & Sports
2
Kids Place a Child Advocacy Center

To reduce the trauma of child abuse by providing a child oriented environment for the coordinated and multi-disciplinary investigation, intervention, and treatment of child sexual and severe physical abuse.

Crime & Legal
3
My Fathers House Nashville

The mission of My Fathers House Nashville (MFHN) is to provide shelter, parenting education, recovery information and life skills for fathers transitioning out of institutional settings or homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
Child Advocacy Center of Cullman Inc

Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation

Human Services
5
Cumberland Childrens Center

The purpose of the corporation is to assist the various law enforcement and child welfare agencies of the State of Tennessee and Cumb Co, as well as to educate and inform the public of as to how to detect and prevent child abuse.

Human Services
6
The Child Advocacy Center of Anderson Co Tn

To combat severe physical and sexual abuse and resulting trauma by coordinating and providing services in a child friendly, safe and nurturing environment.

Human Services
7
Kings Ranch of Jonesboro Inc

King's ranch is a privately funded, nonprofit, nondenominational christian children's home organized to provide hope for adopted children and their families who are at risk of disruption because of the trauma the child incurred from abuse,…

Human Services
8
The Shelter Inc

The shelter's primary purpose is to reduce the effects of domestic violence in the communities it serves by providing housing, clothing, food, and legal aide for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
9
Tennessee Children's Home Inc

Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…

Human Services
10
Families First Inc

The mission of families first is to provide services to strengthen families and to protect children from the cycle of child abuse and neglect.

—
11
Casa of Robertson County Inc

To provide court-appointed special advocates to child victims of abuse and neglect. The programs vision is a safe, permanent, loving home for every child it serves.

Human Services
12
Joy Ranch Inc

To provide housing and services to children who are unable to live with their parents or guardians.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Central Family Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Center of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $20,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $10,200 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONNEW LIFE AUTOMOTIVE: $7,500 · OtherNEW LIFE AUTOMOTIVECENTER OF HOPE: $7,100 · OtherCENTER OF HOPEBUILDING BLOCK SCHOOL-ARTS: $6,869 · OtherBUILDING BLOCK SCHOOL-ARTSCOLUMBIA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY WILLIAMSON -MAURY: $5,027 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY WILLIAMSON -MAURYYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $28,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES INCSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER INC: $10,341 · Human ServicesSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER I…FREEDOM REIGNS RANCH: $6,500 · Human ServicesFREEDOM REIGNS RANCHTHE FAMILY CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY CENTER INCTHE WELL OUTREACH INC: $43,750 · Food & NutritionTHE WELL OUTREACH INCBRIGHT APPLE INC: $20,000 · EducationBRIGHT APPL…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN: $5,350 · Youth Development
Other$77,946Human Services$51,341Food & Nutrition$43,750Education$20,000Youth Development$5,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WELL OUTREACH INC: $43,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $28,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER INC: $10,341 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE: $7,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFREEDOM REIGNS RANCH: $6,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN: $5,350 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY WILLIAMSON -MAURY: $5,027 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…United Way of Middle …Crichton Family Found…Nashville Predators F…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Crichton Family Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Maury County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Maury County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Maury County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home