Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Maury County Inc

Support of community agencies

$168k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Human Services$56kFood & Nutrition$34kYouth Development$5kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $81,277 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $168,120 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $86,843 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $49k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$543k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WELL OUTREACH$33,750
Individual grant recipient$15,000
YOUTH VILLAGES$7,500
NEW LIFE AUTOMOTIVE$7,500
FREEDOM REIGNS RANCH$6,500
THE FAMILY CENTER$6,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MAURY$5,027
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SOUTH CENT TN FAM CTR: $10k → 10%YOUTH VILLAGES: $8k → 10%FREEDOM REIGNS RANCH: $7k → 10%YOUTH VILLAGES: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Counseling Center of Middle Tennessee Inc

To provide quality, affordable counseling to families and individuals.

Recreation & Sports
2
My Fathers House Nashville

The mission of My Fathers House Nashville (MFHN) is to provide shelter, parenting education, recovery information and life skills for fathers transitioning out of institutional settings or homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
3
Family Refuge Center Inc

Provides community outreach, advocacy, and shelter for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Family Services Center Inc

Family services center's mission is to provide a family-focused holistic approach to empowerment and self-sufficiency in an effort to decrease multi-generational poverty while creating healthier families and stronger communities.

Human Services
5
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
6
Family Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc

Child respite and child abuse prevention.

7
Child Advocacy Center of Cullman Inc

Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation

Human Services
8
Homesafe of Sumner Wilson and Robertson Counties

Homesafe provides safe, temorary shelter, and support services for indivduals who have suffered or have been threatened with emotional or physical abuse.

Human Services
9
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
10
Family Crisis Center of Walker Dade Catoosa& Chattooga Coinc

The purpose and object of this organization shall be to provide temporary refuge or shelter, counseling and referral services as appropriate to assist victims of domestic or family violence.

Human Services
11
Casa of the Tennessee Valley

The mission of the organization is to provide a powerful voice for abused and neglected children by advocating for each child, within the court's jurisdiction, in order to ensure safety, permancy and an opportunity to thrive.

Human Services
12
Kings Ranch of Jonesboro Inc

King's ranch is a privately funded, nonprofit, nondenominational christian children's home organized to provide hope for adopted children and their families who are at risk of disruption because of the trauma the child incurred from abuse,…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Central Family Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Center of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEW LIFE AUTOMOTIVE — $7,500 · OtherNEW LIFE AUTOMOTIVECENTER OF HOPE — $7,100 · OtherCENTER OF HOPECOLUMBIA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $6,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY WILLIAMSON -MAURY — $5,027 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY WILLIAMSON -MAURYYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $13,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES INCSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER INC — $10,341 · Human ServicesSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER INCFREEDOM REIGNS RANCH — $6,500 · Human ServicesFREEDOM REIGNS RANCHTHE FAMILY CENTER INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY CENTER INCTHE WELL OUTREACH INC — $33,750 · Food & NutritionTHE WELL OUTREACH INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN — $5,350 · Youth Development
Other$40,627Human Services$35,841Food & Nutrition$33,750Youth Development$5,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WELL OUTREACH INC — $33,750 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER INC — $10,341 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE — $7,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFREEDOM REIGNS RANCH — $6,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN — $5,350 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY WILLIAMSON -MAURY — $5,027 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Crichton Family Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Maury County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph