Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Humphreys County

The organization strives to build a better community by uniting people and resources to meet local needs.

$516k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$549kHealth$115kCrime & Legal$82kReligion$64kEducation$63kPublic Safety & Disaster$38kFood & Nutrition$30kAnimals$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $175,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $515,910 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $340,610 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $170k
$17,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$366k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELPING HANDS OF HUMPHREYS COUNTY$30,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE 23RD$21,600
WE CARE WE HELP$20,000
WOMEN ARE SAFE$20,000
MCHRA MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000
GIANT LEAPS PRESCHOOL$17,200
HUMPHREYS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$11,500
JOSEPHS STOREHOUSE$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
HUMPHREYS HOMELESS COALITION$10,000
MCEWAN SENIOR CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $348k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 11%JOSEPHS STOREHOUSE: $10k → 13%MCHRA: $25k → 14%WOMEN ARE SAFE: $20k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS HUMPHREYS CO: $9k → 11%MCHRA: $25k → 14%WOMEN ARE SAFE INC: $20k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS HUMPHREYS CO: $7k → 11%MCRHA: $21k → 14%WOMEN ARE SAFE INC: $20k → 15%American Red Cross: $6k → 11%MCHRA: $20k → 14%WOMEN ARE SAFE INC: $17k → 15%MCHRA MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 14%Women Are Safe: $17k → 15%MCHRA: $19k → 14%Women Are Safe Inc: $17k → 15%MCHRA: $15k → 14%Women Are Safe Inc: $16k → 15%MCHRA: $11k → 14%Women Are Safe: $16k → 15%MCEWEN SENIOR CITIZENS: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$918k · 10 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$918k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+8%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementReligionCrime & LegalAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MID-CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $157k · revenue +11%
  • JD
    JAMES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $149k · revenue +53%
  • WA
    WOMEN ARE SAFE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $142k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • HR
    HIGHLAND RIM ECONOMIC CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue +106%
  • GL
    GIANT LEAPS PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $17k
  • MS
    McEwen Senior Citizens
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +8% · 33% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
2
Helping Others of Johnson County Tn

Providing hot meals and neccessities of life to any member of our community

Food & Nutrition
3
Hope House of Cocke County

Food pantry

Human Services
4
Homeless Management of Monroe County

Assist the homeless in monroe county, tennessee

Human Services
5
Henderson County Homeless Coalition

Assistance with housing for homeless clients. This can include rent, utilities or deposits. We provided assistance for over 250 clients

Human Services
6
Highland County Homeless Shelter

Provide food and shelter to homeless

Human Services
7
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

8
Humboldt Senior Citizens Center Inc

Provision of programs and services to senior citizens of the city of humboldt, tennessee

9
Harlan County Senior Services Inc

Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

Human Services
10
Grady County Help Agencies Inc

To assist our county's neediest citizens as efficiently and fairly as possible. Services are provided by a pool of volunteers and include food, clothing and help with utilities, rent, medical and other needs. 685 unduplicated clients…

Human Services
11
Giles County Help Center

provide basic necessities for needy & homeless

Human Services
12
Conway County Care Center

Provide Emergency services, services include food, clothing, utility payment assistance, rental assistance, school supplies, infant care and medical assistance for 10442 individuals

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hands of Humphreys Co Inc and the most unlike its peers is Child Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JAMES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC — $148,812 · OtherJAMES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INCWE CARE WE HELP — $125,331 · OtherWE CARE WE HELPWe Care We Help — $40,496 · OtherWe Care We HelpGIANT LEAPS PRESCHOOL — $17,000 · Other+4 more — $28,600 · Other+4 moreMID-CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY — $156,565 · Human ServicesMID-CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCYWOMEN ARE SAFE INC — $142,393 · Human ServicesWOMEN ARE SAFE INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $32,178 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Const…+2 more — $16,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS OF HUMPHREYS CO INC — $150,606 · ReligionHELPING HANDS OF …Child Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District — $81,892 · Crime & LegalChild Adv…HUMPHREYS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $27,929 · AnimalsHIGHLAND RIM ECONOMIC CORPORATION — $19,000 · Community ImprovementHumphreys Homeless Coalition — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF BENTON COUNTY — $6,479 · Philanthropy
Other$360,239Human Services$347,636Religion$150,606Crime & Legal$81,892Animals$27,929Community Improvement$19,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Philanthropy$6,479

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMID-CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY — $156,565 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF HUMPHREYS CO INC — $150,606 over 8y, 46% of budgetJAMES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC — $148,812 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetWOMEN ARE SAFE INC — $142,393 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetChild Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District — $81,892 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $32,178 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMPHREYS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $27,929 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetHIGHLAND RIM ECONOMIC CORPORATION — $19,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJOSEPHS STOREHOUSE OF HURRICANE MILL — $10,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetMcEwen Senior Citizens — $6,500 over 1y, 33% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BENTON COUNTY — $6,479 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MID-CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF HUMPHREYS CO INC
  • Who funds JAMES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds WOMEN ARE SAFE INC
  • Who funds Child Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds HUMPHREYS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds HIGHLAND RIM ECONOMIC CORPORATION
  • Who funds Humphreys Homeless Coalition
  • Who funds JOSEPHS STOREHOUSE OF HURRICANE MILL
  • Who funds McEwen Senior Citizens
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BENTON COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albemarle FoundationNC17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albemarle Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Humphreys County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Humphreys County?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Humphreys County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $167k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph