Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Green County Inc

Building a stronger community by uniting people and resources to solve problems and improve lives.

$419k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$879kFood & Nutrition$326kYouth Development$280kHousing & Shelter$245kHealth$112kEducation$97kEnvironment$86kArts & Culture$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $261,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $419,178 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $158,078 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $187k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Green Haven Family Advocates$31,000
Big BrothersBig Sisters$27,000
Family Svc-S WI&N IL$24,000
GCHS - Education & Truancy$22,000
Green Cty Child Advocacy Cent$20,000
Green Cares Food Pantry$20,000
Family Promise of Gree$17,000
Green Cty Elderly Nutr$16,000
Wknd Food Program for Student$10,000
Rainbow Childcare Inc$9,000
Small World of New Gla$8,700
Green Cty Human Servi$8,500
The Salvation Army$8,000
Home of Our Own$8,000
Monroe Arts Center$7,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Small World of New Gla: $12k → 7%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $25k → 10%SWCAP Neighborhood Health: $9k → 13%Small World of New Gla: $11k → 7%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $25k → 10%Small World of New Gla: $11k → 7%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $24k → 10%Small World of New Gla: $10k → 7%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $24k → 10%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $24k → 10%Small World of New Gla: $9k → 7%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $24k → 10%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $24k → 10%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $22k → 10%Family Svc-S WI&N IL: $22k → 10%Green Cares Food Pantry: $23k → 7%Green Cares Food Pantry: $21k → 7%Green Cares Food Pantry: $20k → 7%Green Cares Food Pantry: $20k → 7%Green Cares Food Pantry: $20k → 7%Green Cares Food Pantry: $19k → 7%Green Cares Food Pantry: $19k → 7%Green Cares Food Pantry: $19k → 7%Green Cares Food Pantry: $19k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $32k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $32k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $32k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $32k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $32k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $32k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $31k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $31k → 7%Green Haven Family Advocates: $31k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $23k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $20k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $20k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $19k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $17k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $15k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $14k → 7%Rainbow Childcare Inc: $14k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $14k → 7%Family Promise of Gree: $13k → 7%Rainbow Childcare Inc: $11k → 7%Rainbow Childcare Inc: $11k → 7%Rainbow Childcare Inc: $11k → 7%Rainbow Childcare Inc: $10k → 7%Rainbow Childcare Inc: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 16 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$2.1M
$13k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREEN HAVEN FAMILY ADVOCATES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $285k · revenue +9%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $274k · revenue +7%
  • SW
    SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • LC
    LITERACY COUNCIL OF GREEN COUNTYLTD
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • SP
    Shakespeare Project
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise of Waukesha County Inc

Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
2
Family Service Agency of Waukesha County Inc

Building stronger communities, strengthening families, and empowering individuals through compassionate, life changing programs and behavioral health services.

Human Services
3
Green County Food Pantry Inc

The purpose of the Green County Food Pantry, Inc. is to provide food for those in need in the Green County area.

Food & Nutrition
4
Greenlight Family Services

Greenlight's mission is to achieve the best outcomes for families, young adults, and children by providing the highest quality services. its primary focus is to provide adoption and guardianship for children in the welfare system.

Human Services
5
New Hope Family Shelter Inc

New hope for families provides shelter and early learning programs to keep families together and lift every child into a promising future.

Housing & Shelter
6
Family Friendly Workplaces Inc

Family friendly workplaces works to address western wisconsin's workforce shortage, and strengthen western wisconsin families by certifying employers as family friendly, and encouraging the adoption of family friendly practices.

Community Improvement
7
Thrive Family Resource Center

Thrive family resource center's mission is to help break the cycle of poverty by offering high quality child care and family support. we are building community, one family at a time.

Human Services
8
Family Promise of the Great Rivers Inc

Family Promise of the Great Rivers is a family homeless shelter offering food, clothing, life skills, and a community of people who care. Beyond our shelter, we also provide eviction prevention, shelter diversion, and long-term case…

Human Services
9
Little Forest School Inc

Childcare

—
10
Child Welfare Society of Flint
—
11
The Family Center of Grosse Pointe & Harper Woods

The family center provides support, connection, and education to families in our community. we provide tools and resources to help people succeed in raising healthy children and building strong families.

Human Services
12
House of Hope Green Bay Inc

House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwestern Wisconsin Community Action Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREEN HAVEN FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $284,844 · Human ServicesGREEN HAVEN FAMILY ADVOCATES INCSOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $244,594 · Human ServicesSOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INCFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS INC: $212,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINO…FAMILY PROMISE OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $154,100 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF GREEN COUNTY INCSMALL WORLD INC OF NEW GLARUS: $88,450 · Human ServicesSMALL WORLD INC OF NEW GLARUSRainbow Childcare of Monroe Inc: $85,250 · Human ServicesRainbow Childcare of Monroe IncBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $273,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY I…ADRC OF GREEN COUNTY: $259,800 · OtherADRC OF GREEN COUNTYSchool District of Monroe WI: $96,583 · OtherSchool District of Monroe WITHE SALVATION ARMY: $85,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYOrion Family Services: $57,000 · OtherOrion Family Services+2 more: $12,500 · OtherHOME OF OUR OWN INC: $52,000 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATION FOR RURAL HOUSING INC: $38,500 · Housing & ShelterFOWLER MEMORIAL FREE DENTAL CLINIC: $89,000 · HealthMonroe Arts Center Inc: $59,300 · Arts & CultureFeeding America: $16,750 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$1,069,738Other$784,383Housing & Shelter$90,500Health$89,000Arts & Culture$59,300Food & Nutrition$16,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREEN HAVEN FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $284,844 over 9y, 10% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $273,500 over 9y, 18% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $244,594 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS INC: $212,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $154,100 over 9y, 20% of budgetFOWLER MEMORIAL FREE DENTAL CLINIC: $89,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetSMALL WORLD INC OF NEW GLARUS: $88,450 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetRainbow Childcare of Monroe Inc: $85,250 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetMonroe Arts Center Inc: $59,300 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetHOME OF OUR OWN INC: $52,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR RURAL HOUSING INC: $38,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetFeeding America: $16,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREEN HAVEN FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOWLER MEMORIAL FREE DENTAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SMALL WORLD INC OF NEW GLARUS ↗
  • Who funds Rainbow Childcare of Monroe Inc ↗
  • Who funds Monroe Arts Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOME OF OUR OWN INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR RURAL HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin IncWI24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Colony Brands Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Green County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Green County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Green County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph