· Public charity
United Way of Green County Inc
Building a stronger community by uniting people and resources to solve problems and improve lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $261,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $419,178 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $158,078 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $187k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Green Haven Family Advocates | $31,000 |
| Big BrothersBig Sisters | $27,000 |
| Family Svc-S WI&N IL | $24,000 |
| GCHS - Education & Truancy | $22,000 |
| Green Cty Child Advocacy Cent | $20,000 |
| Green Cares Food Pantry | $20,000 |
| Family Promise of Gree | $17,000 |
| Green Cty Elderly Nutr | $16,000 |
| Wknd Food Program for Student | $10,000 |
| Rainbow Childcare Inc | $9,000 |
| Small World of New Gla | $8,700 |
| Green Cty Human Servi | $8,500 |
| The Salvation Army | $8,000 |
| Home of Our Own | $8,000 |
| Monroe Arts Center | $7,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GHGREEN HAVEN FAMILY ADVOCATES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $285k · revenue +9%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $274k · revenue +7%
- SWSOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC9× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- LCLITERACY COUNCIL OF GREEN COUNTYLTDone grant, 2021 · $7k
- SPShakespeare Projectone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.
The purpose of the Green County Food Pantry, Inc. is to provide food for those in need in the Green County area.
Greenlight's mission is to achieve the best outcomes for families, young adults, and children by providing the highest quality services. its primary focus is to provide adoption and guardianship for children in the welfare system.
Family friendly workplaces works to address western wisconsin's workforce shortage, and strengthen western wisconsin families by certifying employers as family friendly, and encouraging the adoption of family friendly practices.
Thrive family resource center's mission is to help break the cycle of poverty by offering high quality child care and family support. we are building community, one family at a time.
To alleviate hunger and promote self-sufficiency with dignity and compassion to low-income, elderly and disabled residents of Ozaukee County.
The family center provides support, connection, and education to families in our community. we provide tools and resources to help people succeed in raising healthy children and building strong families.
New hope for families provides shelter and early learning programs to keep families together and lift every child into a promising future.
House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…
Provider of treatment foster care for children and youth with complex needs.
Family Promise of the Great Rivers is a family homeless shelter offering food, clothing, life skills, and a community of people who care. Beyond our shelter, we also provide eviction prevention, shelter diversion, and long-term case…
Childcare
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwestern Wisconsin Community Action Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREEN HAVEN FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FOWLER MEMORIAL FREE DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SMALL WORLD INC OF NEW GLARUS ↗
- Who funds Rainbow Childcare of Monroe Inc ↗
- Who funds Monroe Arts Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HOME OF OUR OWN INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR RURAL HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Colony Brands Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Green County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.