· Public charity
Colony Brands Foundation Inc
Support Madison Community Foundation, a Sec.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $4,523,432 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,667,628 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $144,196 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $215k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $269k
- $250k+1 grant · $4.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Green County Family YMCA | $4,002,372 |
| UW-Madison Foundation | $169,159 |
| UW-Madison Foundation | $100,000 |
| Main Street Monroe Inc | $32,788 |
| Green County Cheese Days Inc | $29,000 |
| Monroe Arts Center | $23,394 |
| School District of New Glarus | $23,100 |
| Madison Community Foundation | $20,907 |
| Friends of New Glarus Woods | $20,000 |
| The Charles E Kubly Fdn | $20,000 |
| Rubin for Kids | $15,000 |
| Green County Humane Society | $10,681 |
| School District of Monroe WI | $10,500 |
| Edgewood College Inc | $10,000 |
| Jacobs Swag Foundation Inc | $9,238 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGreen County Family YMCA Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $4.7M · revenue +268% · 69% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +39%
- MCMONROE CLINIC AND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2023 · $303k · revenue +114% · 45% of their budget
Funded once
- THTurner Hall of Monroe Incone grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue -10%
- BTBLACKHAWK TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -32%
- FOFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Working together to achieve the highest standards in healthcare, we create healthy communities through god's healing spirit. vision: exceptional healthcare, an exceptional experience.
Renew wisconsin leads and accelerates the transformation to wisconsin's renewable energy future through advocacy, education, and collaboration.
The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…
Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.
Advance science-informed analysis and policy solutions that address wisconsin's greatest conservation challenges.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…
Building a stronger community by uniting people and resources to solve problems and improve lives.
Madison community cooperative's mission is to improve the madison community by providing low-cost, not-for-profit cooperative housing for very low to moderate income people and to be inclusive of underrepresented and marginalized groups.
The mission of the zoological society is to take part in conserving wildlife and endangered species, to educate people about the importance of wildlife and the environment, and to support the milwaukee county zoo.
Wisconsin medical cu is a not for profit, member owned organization dedicated to meet the members needs by providing sound financial services including competitive rates, information and services while maintaining financial stability of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Soc At the Un Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Green County Family YMCA Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Monroe Arts Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONROE CLINIC AND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Green County Humane Society ↗
- Who funds THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RUBIN FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Green County Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds JACOBS SWAG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Green County Food Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds Monroe Theatre Guild Inc ↗
- Who funds ROAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREEN HAVEN FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds Turner Hall of Monroe Inc ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET MONROE INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER MADISON CONSERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BLACKHAWK TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds FORUM-MYHA INC ↗
- Who funds Green County Emergency Medical Service ↗
- Who funds Green County Cheese Days Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN LAKES ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Only in Wisconsin Giving Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Madison Community Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way of Green County Inc · John J Frautschi Family Foundation Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · John W Thompson and Jane a Bartell Charitable Foun · United Way of Dane County Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Colony Brands Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Colony Brands Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Colony Brands Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.