· Public charity
United Way of Greater Nashua Inc
To make measurable improvements in peoples lives by mobilizing the caring power of our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $79,317 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $111,872 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $32,555 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Nashua Police Athletic League | $22,725 |
| Girls Inc of NH | $18,103 |
| Granite United Way | $9,375 |
| The Front Door Agency | $6,816 |
| Bridges | $6,422 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Nasua | $5,813 |
| Marguerite's Place | $5,063 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters of NH | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $811k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BDBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $356k · revenue +309%
- TFTHE FRONT DOOR AGENCY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $331k · revenue +156%
- BGBoys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $267k · revenue +174%
Funded once
- SSSTEPPING STONESone grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue 0%
- WHWEBSTER HOUSEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +35%
- JFJolie-Pitt Foundationone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -1493% · 44% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
Nhpha is a member driven organization that champions public health policy and practice, enriches the workforce and inspires leaders to improve the publics health.
To provide the highest quality of specialized care and support for developmentally challenged individuals while promoting growth and indpendence
CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…
The Mission of Granite VNA, Inc. is we enhance dignity and independence for people delivering quality health care and promoting wellness in homes and communities through all stages of life.
NeighborWorks Southern New Hampshire enhances people's lives and the community environment by providing access to quality housing services, revitalizing neighborhoods and supporting opportunities for personal empowerment. The target market…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashua Children's Home and the most unlike its peers is International Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE YOUTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE FRONT DOOR AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc ↗
- Who funds NASHUA ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Southern New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Milford Thrives ↗
- Who funds GREATER NASHUA DENTAL CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Nashua Police Athletic League ↗
- Who funds BRING IT ↗
- Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds MARGUERITE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds Home Health and Hospice Care ↗
- Who funds Community Council of Nashua NH Inc ↗
- Who funds BUILDING COMMUNITY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds THE GRANITE STATE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds PINK REVOLUTION BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE OF NH CORP ↗
- Who funds NASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds St Joseph Hospital ↗
- Who funds OPERATION DELTA DOG INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES ↗
- Who funds GREATER NASHUA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
- Who funds WEBSTER HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Jolie-Pitt Foundation ↗
- Who funds REVIVE RECOVERY INC REVIVE RECOVERY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Ann de Nicola Tuw · Eastern Bank Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Barker Foundation Inc · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · We Share A Common Thread Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Granite United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Greater Nashua Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.