Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Franklin County

Our mission is to focus on the power of giving by promoting volunteerism and mobilizing financial resources to eliminate the countys compelling human service needs

$167k
Granted FY2020
11
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Human Services$376kFood & Nutrition$216kPhilanthropy$194kYouth Development$77kHousing & Shelter$75kEducation$60kAnimals$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$13k
02FY2020 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $140k
$13,673
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salvation Army$28,727
Various Organiza$22,682
Senior Citizens$18,355
Sunshine Center$17,059
Simon House$13,800
Soup Kitchen$13,673
The King Center$13,465
YMCA$12,300
Emergency Food P$9,279
Thornhill Learni$9,225
American Red Cro$7,650
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Senior Citizens: $28k → 14%Senior Citizens: $27k → 14%Senior Citizens: $27k → 14%Senior Citizens: $18k → 14%BGCA: $13k → 14%BGCA: $13k → 14%BGCA: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$983k · 12 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$983k
$47k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FRANKLIN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $101k · revenue +16%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKY'S WILDERNESS ROAD COUNCIL INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $77k · revenue +24%
  • SH
    SIMON HOUSE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $75k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • VO
    Various Org
    one grant, 2017 · $47k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Franklin County Community Meals Program Inc

Working in partnership with community to alleviate hunger in franklin county.

2
Jessamine Co Food Pantry

We provide food (free of charge) to our community neighbors (jessamine co. ky) who are in need.

Food & Nutrition
3
Community Ministries Inc Community Kitchen

Providing free lunches to the hungry, sheltering the homeless during inclement weather, and case management for those seeking financial assistance. services are offered to those in the paducah, kentucky area.

Religion
4
Fayette County Commission On Aging Incorporated

The fayette county commission on aging serves and represents those adults 60 years of age and older in fayette county. the emphasis is on improving the quality of life of those fayette county citizens, 60 and above, and providing the…

5
The Gentry House Inc

The gentry house, inc. is an emergency transitional homeless shelter to help families with children in the region of murray and calloway county, ky. residents are given rent and utility assistance.

6
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
7
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

8
Gods Pantry of Pulaski County Inc

A group comprised of individuals, church groups, civic organizations, and city and county officials joining together their efforts to provide Pulaski County residents food in emergency situations.

9
Coalition of Tracy Citizens to Assist the Homeless

The organization provides a transitional home for men to live in a safe environment while connecting them with the resources for substance abuse,mental and physical health. we assist them with legal matters and help themfind sustainable…

Human Services
10
Crawford County Community Christian Help Center

To provide services to crawford county citizens

Human Services
11
Eastern Kentucky Child Care Coalition Inc

To provide a child food program for childcare providers and nutrition program for the elderly

12
Franklin County Children & Families Comm Unity Resource Board Association

To encourage development and full utilization of community resources to build and sustain a comprehensive mental health system of care for children and families in Franklin County, MO.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frankfort Area Children's Council and the most unlike its peers is Emergency Community Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY — $162,650 · OtherSALVATION ARMYVarious Organiza — $147,408 · OtherVarious OrganizaYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FRANKFORT KENTUCKY INC — $86,531 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FRANKFORT KENTUCKY INCFRANKFORT AREA CHILDREN'S COUNCIL — $85,155 · OtherFRANKFORT AREA CHILDREN'S COUNCILGIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKY'S WILDERNESS ROAD COUNCIL INC — $76,711 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKY'S WILDERNESS ROAD COUNCIL INCSIMON HOUSE INC — $75,382 · OtherSIMON HOUSE INCVarious Org — $46,803 · OtherVarious OrgAmer Red Cross — $40,549 · OtherAmer Red CrossFRANKLIN COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $101,261 · Human ServicesFRANKLIN COUNT…BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $31,781 · Human ServicesBLUE GRASS COM…COALITION OF COMMITTED CHRISTIANS INC — $67,693 · Food & NutritionCOALITION OF…Emergency Community Food Pantry — $47,542 · Food & NutritionEmergency Co…THORNHILL EDUCATION CENTER INC — $60,260 · Education
Other$721,189Human Services$133,042Food & Nutrition$115,235Education$60,260

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FRANKFORT KENTUCKY INC — $86,531 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetFRANKFORT AREA CHILDREN'S COUNCIL — $85,155 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKY'S WILDERNESS ROAD COUNCIL INC — $76,711 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSIMON HOUSE INC — $75,382 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetCOALITION OF COMMITTED CHRISTIANS INC — $67,693 over 4y, 10% of budgetTHORNHILL EDUCATION CENTER INC — $60,260 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetEmergency Community Food Pantry — $47,542 over 4y, 14% of budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $31,781 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Bluegrass IncKY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Franklin County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph