Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Enid and Northwest Oklahoma Inc

Impacting the community by identifying, prioritizing, and facilitating the meeting of human service needs.

$749k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MCommunity Improvement$480kRecreation & Sports$458kYouth Development$422kHousing & Shelter$407kHealth$383kCrime & Legal$375kFood & Nutrition$253kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $595k
$67,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA OF ENID$92,500
CDSA$82,500
DENNY PRICE YMCA$80,000
GARFIELD CO CHILD ADVOCACY$80,000
SALVATION ARMY$72,000
YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$67,500
RETIRED SR VOLUNTEERS PROGRAM$67,500
LOAVES & FISHES$52,500
HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH & HEARING$40,000
4RKIDS FOUNDATION$30,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$27,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$25,000
BOOKER T WASHINGTON COMMUNITY CENT$25,000
HUMAN SERVICES ALLIANCE$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%4RKIDS FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%4RKIDS FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%LOAVES & FISHES: $60k → 16%LOAVES & FISHES: $53k → 16%Loaves and Fishes: $35k → 16%LOAVES & FISHES: $30k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $30k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $28k → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $25k → 16%Loaves and Fishes: $25k → 16%Loaves and Fishes: $25k → 16%Loaves and Fishes: $25k → 16%Catholic Charities: $25k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $23k → 16%Catholic Charities: $21k → 16%Catholic Charities: $19k → 16%Catholic Charities: $19k → 16%Human Services Alliance: $8k → 16%Human Services Alliance: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 15 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -83% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$4.1M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-83%

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $500k · revenue +29%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $480k · revenue +124%
  • TD
    THE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $458k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • CC
    Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Central Oklahoma Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
2
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
3
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
4
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
5
Payne County Youth Services Inc

Payne County Youth Services, Inc. is dedicated to providing free quality services for the positive development and recovery of children, youth, and families.

Human Services
6
Community Youth Services of Southern Oklahoma

To provide reguge and healing for youth and families

—
7
Ywca of Northwest Ohio

The ywca of northwest ohio strives to be a powerful proactive force for the support and advancement of women and girls in our community that will continue to work for peace, justice, equality, and dignity for all people.

Human Services
8
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
9
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
10
Eastern Oklahoma Youth Services Inc

To provide a comprehensive array of social and educational services to children and families.

Human Services
11
Owasso Community Resources Inc

Build a stronger community through volunteerism, community coordination and access to services.

Philanthropy
12
Okmulgee-Okfuskee County Youth Services

To shelter and improve the quality of life for children, youth, and families in the corporations service area by addressing mental health needs through direct services of shelter, consultation, counseling, and education.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth & Family Services North Central Ok; the most unlike its peers is Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Central Oklahoma Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $499,803 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC: $458,113 · Human ServicesTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OK…GARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC: $374,503 · Human ServicesGARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL…+1 more: $32,793 · Human ServicesRETIRED SR VOLUNTEERS PROGRAM: $331,136 · OtherRETIRED SR VOLUNTEERS PROGRAMTHE SALVATION ARMY: $328,655 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHAYNE A HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER: $197,393 · OtherTHAYNE A HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH AND…CIMARRON COUNCILINC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $186,169 · OtherCIMARRON COUNCILINC BOY SCOUTS OF A…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $164,251 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCE…ENID METROPOLITAN AREA HUMAN SERVICE COMMISSION INC: $48,673 · Other+1 more: $7,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO: $479,552 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEV…YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NORTH CENTRAL OK: $407,026 · Housing & ShelterYOUTH & FAM…LOAVES & FISHES OF NW OKLA INC: $252,500 · Food & NutritionBooker T Washington Community Center Inc: $235,489 · Youth Development4R Kids Foundation: $55,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$1,365,212Other$1,263,277Community Improvement$479,552Housing & Shelter$407,026Food & Nutrition$252,500Youth Development$235,489Philanthropy$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $499,803 over 9y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO: $479,552 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC: $458,113 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetYOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NORTH CENTRAL OK: $407,026 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetGARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC: $374,503 over 9y, 13% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES OF NW OKLA INC: $252,500 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetBooker T Washington Community Center Inc: $235,489 over 9y, 65% of budgetTHAYNE A HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER: $197,393 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetCIMARRON COUNCILINC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $186,169 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $164,251 over 9y, 0.4% of budget4R Kids Foundation: $55,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,793 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetConsumer Credit Counseling Service of Central Oklahoma Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO ↗
  • Who funds THE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NORTH CENTRAL OK ↗
  • Who funds GARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES OF NW OKLA INC ↗
  • Who funds Booker T Washington Community Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THAYNE A HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CIMARRON COUNCILINC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds 4R Kids Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cherokee Strip Community FoundationOK24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cherokee Strip Community Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Enid and Northwest Oklahoma Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Enid and Northwest Oklahoma Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Youth & Family Services North Central Ok: 18% of income from government
  • Community Development Support Associatio: 2% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of Enid and Northwest Oklahoma’s filings →

More from the funding graph