Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Enid and Northwest Oklahoma Inc

Impacting the community by identifying, prioritizing, and facilitating the meeting of human service needs.

$749k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$1.2MCommunity Improvement$480kRecreation & Sports$458kYouth Development$422kHousing & Shelter$407kHealth$383kCrime & Legal$375kFood & Nutrition$253kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $595k
$67,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA OF ENID$92,500
CDSA$82,500
DENNY PRICE YMCA$80,000
GARFIELD CO CHILD ADVOCACY$80,000
SALVATION ARMY$72,000
YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$67,500
RETIRED SR VOLUNTEERS PROGRAM$67,500
LOAVES & FISHES$52,500
HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH & HEARING$40,000
4RKIDS FOUNDATION$30,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$27,500
BOOKER T WASHINGTON COMMUNITY CENT$25,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$25,000
HUMAN SERVICES ALLIANCE$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%4RKIDS FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%4RKIDS FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%LOAVES & FISHES: $60k → 16%LOAVES & FISHES: $53k → 16%Loaves and Fishes: $35k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $30k → 16%LOAVES & FISHES: $30k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $28k → 16%Loaves and Fishes: $25k → 16%Catholic Charities: $25k → 16%Loaves and Fishes: $25k → 16%Loaves and Fishes: $25k → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $25k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $23k → 16%Catholic Charities: $21k → 16%Catholic Charities: $19k → 16%Catholic Charities: $19k → 16%Human Services Alliance: $8k → 16%Human Services Alliance: $7k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 15 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -83% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$4.1M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-83%

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $500k · revenue +29%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $480k · revenue +124%
  • TD
    THE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $458k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • CC
    Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Central Oklahoma Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
2
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
3
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
4
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
5
Payne County Youth Services Inc

Payne County Youth Services, Inc. is dedicated to providing free quality services for the positive development and recovery of children, youth, and families.

Human Services
6
Community Youth Services of Southern Oklahoma

To provide reguge and healing for youth and families

7
Ywca of Northwest Ohio

The ywca of northwest ohio strives to be a powerful proactive force for the support and advancement of women and girls in our community that will continue to work for peace, justice, equality, and dignity for all people.

Human Services
8
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

9
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
10
Eastern Oklahoma Youth Services Inc

To provide a comprehensive array of social and educational services to children and families.

Human Services
11
Owasso Community Resources Inc

Build a stronger community through volunteerism, community coordination and access to services.

Philanthropy
12
Okmulgee-Okfuskee County Youth Services

To shelter and improve the quality of life for children, youth, and families in the corporations service area by addressing mental health needs through direct services of shelter, consultation, counseling, and education.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth & Family Services North Central Ok and the most unlike its peers is Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Central Oklahoma Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $499,803 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC — $458,113 · Human ServicesTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OK…GARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC — $374,503 · Human ServicesGARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL…+1 more — $32,793 · Human ServicesRETIRED SR VOLUNTEERS PROGRAM — $331,136 · OtherRETIRED SR VOLUNTEERS PROGRAMTHE SALVATION ARMY — $328,655 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHAYNE A HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER — $197,393 · OtherTHAYNE A HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH AND…CIMARRON COUNCILINC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $186,169 · OtherCIMARRON COUNCILINC BOY SCOUTS OF A…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $164,251 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCE…ENID METROPOLITAN AREA HUMAN SERVICE COMMISSION INC — $48,673 · Other+1 more — $7,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO — $479,552 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEV…YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NORTH CENTRAL OK — $407,026 · Housing & ShelterYOUTH & FAM…LOAVES & FISHES OF NW OKLA INC — $252,500 · Food & NutritionBooker T Washington Community Center Inc — $235,489 · Youth Development4R Kids Foundation — $55,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$1,365,212Other$1,263,277Community Improvement$479,552Housing & Shelter$407,026Food & Nutrition$252,500Youth Development$235,489Philanthropy$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $499,803 over 9y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO — $479,552 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC — $458,113 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetYOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NORTH CENTRAL OK — $407,026 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetGARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC — $374,503 over 9y, 13% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES OF NW OKLA INC — $252,500 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetBooker T Washington Community Center Inc — $235,489 over 9y, 65% of budgetTHAYNE A HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER — $197,393 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetCIMARRON COUNCILINC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $186,169 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $164,251 over 9y, 0.4% of budget4R Kids Foundation — $55,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $32,793 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetConsumer Credit Counseling Service of Central Oklahoma Inc — $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO
  • Who funds THE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NORTH CENTRAL OK
  • Who funds GARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES OF NW OKLA INC
  • Who funds Booker T Washington Community Center Inc
  • Who funds THAYNE A HEDGES REGIONAL SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER
  • Who funds CIMARRON COUNCILINC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
  • Who funds 4R Kids Foundation
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Central Oklahoma Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cherokee Strip Community FoundationOK24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cherokee Strip Community Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Enid and Northwest Oklahoma Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Youth & Family Services North Central Ok18% of income from government
  • Community Development Support Associatio2% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph