Skip to content
United Way of Daviess County Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Daviess County Inc

The objective of the organization shall be to develop team work among the social service agencies serving Daviess County and their constituencies in the interest of the financial support of such agencies.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$449kHousing & Shelter$120kRecreation & Sports$50kFood & Nutrition$42kYouth Development$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kCrime & Legal$16kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$642k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH FIRST INC$16,000
YMCA Daviess County$7,000
Senior & Family Services Inc$5,000
Red Cross$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $490k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%YMCA Daviess County: $100k → 11%Red Cross: $8k → 16%YMCA Daviess County: $100k → 11%Red Cross: $5k → 16%Four Rivers Daviess County: $26k → 11%Four Rivers Daviess County: $26k → 11%Daviess County YMCA: $21k → 11%Daviess County YMCA: $20k → 11%Daviess County YMCA: $20k → 11%YMCA Daviess County: $18k → 11%Four Rivers Daviess County: $17k → 11%Four Rivers Daviess County: $17k → 11%YMCA Daviess County: $15k → 11%Four Rivers Daviess County: $13k → 11%YMCA Daviess County: $9k → 11%Hopes Voice: $8k → 11%Hopes Voice: $8k → 11%YMCA Daviess County: $7k → 11%YMCA WISH Summer Camp: $7k → 11%Senior and Family Services: $6k → 11%Senior and Family Services: $6k → 11%Senior and Family Services: $6k → 11%Senior and Family Services: $6k → 11%Senior and Family Services: $6k → 11%Senior & Family Services Inc: $6k → 11%Hopes Voice: $5k → 11%Senior & Family Services Inc: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$687k · 10 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$687k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+38%

Still filing today

90%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DAVIESS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $316k · revenue +31%
  • YF
    YOUTH FIRST
    3× · 2021–2025 · $41k · revenue +43%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • WI
    Washington IN Parks and Rec
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
  • AR
    American Red Cross
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc

Indianapolis Interfaith Hospitality Network leverages the resources of houses of worship in the greater Indianapolis area to provide emergency shelter, food, case management, and aftercare services to families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
2
Lifesteps Inc

Helping individuals and families with life's changing needs by providing programs and services which will improve their quality of life.

Education
3
Victory Family Services
Human Services
4
Iris Family Support Center Inc

Iris family support center, formerly known as scan, protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.

Human Services
5
Residential Services Inc

Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.

Health
6
Family Promise of Hamilton Co Inc

Provide shelter, temporary housing and wraparound services to people experiencing homelessness and/or living in poverty.

Human Services
7
Family to Family Inc dba Family Voices Indiana

Family Voices Indiana's Mission is to support families who have children and youth with health care needs and/or disabilities through eduction, outreach, and community partnerships.

—
8
Interfaith Family Services of Ocean County of New Jersey

Assist homeless and unemployed to seek shelter and employment

Housing & Shelter
9
Dismas House of Indiana Inc

Provide transitional housing an other services for persons released from prison

Crime & Legal
10
New Priorities Family Services
Crime & Legal
11
Dsi Diversified Solutions Inc

Dsi diversified solutions is established to enable individuals with disabilities to attain self-dependence, inclusion in normal life experiences, and general life enrichment, by working in partnership with them, their families, and the…

Housing & Shelter
12
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Four Rivers Resource Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity of Daviess. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAVIESS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC: $316,300 · Human ServicesDAVIESS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INCFOUR RIVERS RESOURCE SERVICES INC: $98,717 · Human ServicesFOUR RIVERS RESOURCE SERVICES INCSenior & Family Services Inc: $41,000 · Human ServicesSenior & Family Services IncChildren and Family Services Inc: $21,100 · Human Services+1 more: $13,000 · Human ServicesWashington IN Parks and Rec: $50,000 · OtherWashington IN Pa…Feed my Sheep: $41,500 · OtherFeed my SheepTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $12,031 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURD…American Red Cross: $7,718 · OtherAmerican Red Cro…DAVIESS COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $55,000 · Community ImprovementYOUTH FIRST: $41,000 · HealthFAMILY LIFE SERVICES OF WASHINGTON INC: $6,500 · HealthRETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM OF DAVIESS COUNTY INDIANA INC: $38,525 · PhilanthropyHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DAVIESS: $21,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$490,117Other$111,249Community Improvement$55,000Health$47,500Philanthropy$38,525Housing & Shelter$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAVIESS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC: $316,300 over 9y, 13% of budgetFOUR RIVERS RESOURCE SERVICES INC: $98,717 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDAVIESS COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $55,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetSenior & Family Services Inc: $41,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $41,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM OF DAVIESS COUNTY INDIANA INC: $38,525 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetChildren and Family Services Inc: $21,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY LIFE SERVICES OF WASHINGTON INC: $6,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation Alliance IncIN21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Daviess County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Daviess County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Daviess County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home