Loading…
· Public charity
United Way of Daviess County Inc
The objective of the organization shall be to develop team work among the social service agencies serving Daviess County and their constituencies in the interest of the financial support of such agencies.
$85k
Granted FY2024
7
Grants
1
Communities
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0171% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Human Services$374kCommunity Improvement$55kPhilanthropy$39kHealth$32kHousing & Shelter$21kOther$210k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
low income
2020
low income
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
youthchildren
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$679k
Total assets
Largest grants
- YOUTH FIRST INC$16,000
- Purdue Univerity$12,031
- YMCA Daviess County$9,300
- Daviess County Partnership Inc$9,000
- Red Cross$8,000
- Senior & Family Services Inc$6,000
- Hopes Voice$5,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $374k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 14%. 2% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$646k · 9 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
3
Total granted
$646k
$64k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+12%
+38%
Still filing today
78%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YWYMCA WISH Summer Camp8× · 2017–2024 · $309k · revenue +70%
- RSRetired Sr Volunteer Prog5× · 2017–2021 · $39k · revenue +12%
- YFYouth First2× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- WIWashington IN Parks and Recone grant, 2020 · $50k
- RCRed Crossone grant, 2021 · $8k
- PCPregnancy Care Centergraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Multi-County Youth & Family Services Inc
Community-based counseling, social services, prevention and diversionary youth services program. Provides child abuse/neglect and/or family violence crisis intervention, prevention and treatment to families & children
Human Services
2
Harrison County Community Services
To provide a variety of services to help the people of harrison county meet their basic needs.
Human Services
3
Lifespan Family Services
Organization provides foster care services to children and adolescentsfrom birth to age 21. It recruits and trains foster parents. It alsoprovides adoption services which include evaluation, approval processing,etc.
Human Services
4
Children's Village Family Service
To provide permanent support for the activities and programs of the Village Family Service Center.
Human Services
5
Nicholas County Family Resource Network Inc
Family and child services
Human Services
6
Dawson County Family Partners
County-wide organization that works with partners in our communities to give families what they need to thrive so they can stay together, remain self-sufficient, and support the health and learning of their children.
Human Services
7
Your Family Resource Connectioninc
The organization is committed to providing safe and affordable housing to women in the danville community who are unable to live independently because of economic or personal circumstances.
—
8
Davids Hope
To assist individuals recovering from addiction, implement lifestyle changes, gain employment and housing
Health
9
Heartland Family Service
To strengthen individuals and families in our community through education, counseling and support services.
Human Services
10
Family Solutions Inc
Mental health services creating opportunities for healing for children, adults, & families. Programs to meet the needs of the youth & families we serve. School-based counseling, outpatient therapy, psychiatric day treatment &…
—
11
New Family Life Services
To help those facing difficult pregnancy related issues.
Health
12
Child & Family Services of Yuma Inc
Provide Behavioral health out patient services, referral and advocacy for family unity
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children and Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity of Daviess. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$374,400Other$209,966Community Improvement$55,000Philanthropy$38,525Health$31,500Housing & Shelter$21,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation Alliance IncIN24.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Franklin P and Arthur W Perdue Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation United Way of Daviess County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Daviess County Partnership Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 331088311 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Daviess County Partnership Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to United Way of Daviess County Inc?
Find your warmest path to United Way of Daviess County Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines