Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Central Texas Inc

To provide support, both managerial and financial, to human service programs of the central texas area.

$716k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.2MYouth Development$961kHuman Services$746kHousing & Shelter$473kCrime & Legal$362kEducation$360kFood & Nutrition$355kCommunity Improvement$89kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $492,656, the rows itemized in this filing. The $716,256 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $223,600 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC$80,000
RALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC$60,100
CENTRAL TEXAS 4-C INC$55,000
CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES$54,556
FAMILIES IN CRISIS INC$45,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS BELL-CORYELL COUNTIES INC$40,000
FAMILY PROMISE EAST BELL CO$40,000
HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC$35,000
SALVATION ARMY$30,000
CHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST$20,000
STARRY INC$15,000
HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY ACTION$10,000
TEMPLE HOUSING RESIDENTIAL CORPORATION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $868k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES: $60k → 14%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $60k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES: $60k → 14%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $55k → 14%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $55k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES: $55k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES: $55k → 14%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $50k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES: $49k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES: $48k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES: $48k → 14%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $40k → 14%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $35k → 14%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $35k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES: $33k → 14%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $25k → 14%FOSTER LOVE BELL COUNTY INC: $18k → 14%FOSTER LOVE BELL COUNTY INC: $15k → 14%FEED MY SHEEP - TEMPLE: $35k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $15k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $14k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 25 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$4.6M
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+115%

Still filing today

76%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $625k · revenue +129%
  • RW
    RALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $547k · revenue +76%
  • CT
    CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU
    8× · 2017–2024 · $405k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • FM
    FEED MY SHEEP - TEMPLEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +115%
  • PK
    PEACEABLE KINGDOM RETREAT FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
2
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
5
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
6
Hope of South Texas Inc

To provide the highest quality of appropriate investigative, assessment, and ongoing thrapeutic treatment services for abused chilren and their families throught the four county service area (victoria, jackson, goliad, and dewitt).

—
7
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
8
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
9
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
10
Northeast Texas Child Advocacy Center Inc

To bring hope and healing while working together to break the cycle of child abuse.

Human Services
11
Homeless Outreach Mitigation and Emergency Center

to reach functional zero homelessness in Hays County through outreach case management direct aid and emergency response while maintaining the dignity of the people we serve

Human Services
12
Turning Point Church of Bay City Tx

To teach the Word, promote fellowship and educate youth for adulthood. To help individuals & families with food, housing and transportation needs. We also provide drug and addition counseling as well as marriage counseling.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foster Love Bell County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Our Lady of the Angels Maternity Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $405,126 · Human ServicesCENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES …HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $354,818 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BEL…FAMILIES IN CRISIS: $341,600 · Human ServicesFAMILIES IN CRISIS+4 more: $108,487 · Human Services+4 moreTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $625,200 · HealthTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLIN…BELL COUNTY SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INC: $159,000 · HealthBELL COUNTY SOCIETY F…BODY OF CHRIST COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $91,881 · HealthBODY OF CHRIST COMMUN…CEN-TEX ALCOHOLIC REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $516,000 · OtherCEN-TEX ALCOHOLIC REHA…SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $148,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NATIONA…BELL COUNTY COMMUNITY COALITION: $60,000 · OtherBELL COUNTY COMMUNITY …TEMPLE HOUSING RESIDENTIAL CORPORATION: $53,500 · OtherTEMPLE HOUSING RESIDEN…STARRY Inc: $35,000 · Other+5 more: $124,683 · Other+5 moreRALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC: $546,710 · Youth DevelopmentRALPH WILSON …+1 more: $8,664 · Youth DevelopmentFAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC: $212,000 · Housing & ShelterFort Cavazos Community Habitat for Humanity Inc: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterOUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MATERNITY HOME INC: $64,393 · Housing & ShelterCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $245,273 · Crime & LegalCASA OF BELL AND CORYELL COUNTIES: $76,500 · Crime & LegalLONE STAR LEGAL AID: $40,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $359,797 · Education
Human Services$1,210,031Health$876,081Other$937,183Youth Development$555,374Housing & Shelter$366,393Crime & Legal$361,773Education$359,797

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $625,200 over 8y, 10% of budgetRALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC: $546,710 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetCEN-TEX ALCOHOLIC REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $516,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $405,126 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $359,797 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $354,818 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetFAMILIES IN CRISIS: $341,600 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $245,273 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC: $212,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetBELL COUNTY SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INC: $159,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetBODY OF CHRIST COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $91,881 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetFort Cavazos Community Habitat for Humanity Inc: $90,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCASA OF BELL AND CORYELL COUNTIES: $76,500 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetOUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MATERNITY HOME INC: $64,393 over 3y, 13% of budgetLONE STAR LEGAL AID: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTARRY Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFEED MY SHEEP - TEMPLE: $35,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetFOSTER LOVE BELL COUNTY INC: $33,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetCHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST: $30,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetTEMPLE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC: $29,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC: $28,724 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $11,487 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $8,664 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter FoundationPA27.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · The Frank W & Sue Mayborn Foundation · Scott & White Healthcare Foundation · Rock Rose Foundation Inc · Bell Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Tri-County Area · Garlyn & Lajuan Shelton Christian Foundation · Cadence Bank Foundation · Rotary International Temple Rotary Club · Scott & White Memorial Hospital · BBVA Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Central Texas Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Central Texas Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Central Texas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph