Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Abilene

UNITED WAY OF ABILENE promotes the health, education, and financial stability of every person in west central texas by leveraging the intellectual, organizational, institutional, financial, faith-based, and personal resources of its local communities.

$1.9M
Granted FY2019
30
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Crime & Legal$882kHuman Services$846kHealth$732kYouth Development$572kHousing & Shelter$365kEducation$319kCommunity Improvement$236kEmployment$137kOther$0
02FY2019 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 30 grants below total $1,526,522, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,910,880 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $384,358 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $209k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.3M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAY NURSERY OF ABILENE$180,000
NOAH PROJECT$129,000
ABILENE HOPE HAVEN$120,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE BIG COUNTRY$104,500
BIG COUNTRY CASA$88,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ABILENE$82,082
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$80,000
REGIONAL VICTIMS CRISIS CENTER$72,000
SHACKELFORD CO RESOURCE CENTER$72,000
ABILENE TAYLOR PUBLIC HEALTH$71,000
CANCER SERVICES NETWORK$63,000
PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CARE MISSION$60,000
CITY OF ABI ADAPTIVE REC$54,500
NEW BEGINNINGS BIG COUNTRY$52,224
FAITHWORKS OF ABILENE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW BEGINNINGS BIG COUNTRY: $52k → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $45k → 16%ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN: $25k → 22%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $43k → 16%ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN: $24k → 22%ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN: $15k → 22%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $24k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 22%NEW BEGINNINGS BIG COUNTRY: $12k → 16%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE: $23k → 16%CHRISTIAN SERVICE CENTER OF ABILENE: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 26 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
2

Total granted

$4.2M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+42%

Still filing today

85%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DN
    Day Nursery of Abilene Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $499k · revenue +72%
  • NP
    NOAH PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $372k · revenue +23%
  • CI
    Communities in Schools of the Big Country
    8× · 2017–2024 · $316k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • AB
    Abilene Back the Badge Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • RF
    Reach for a Difference
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc

Pregnancy Resources' mission is to inspire hope and unconditionally love everyone we serve by empowering them to thrive through compassionate support and positive solutions.

Civil Rights
2
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
3
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
4
Abigail's Place

Committed to supporting displaced single mothers in Fort Bend County by providing housing assistance and wraparound services.

Housing & Shelter
5
Day Nursery of Abilene Inc

We provide affordable quality child care for a diverse community. Our four licensed facilities deliver quality child care programming for children ages birth to 10 years, so that parents can work, attend school, and/or receive job training…

—
6
Bluebonnet Childrens Center

To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.

Crime & Legal
7
Volunteer Services Council for the Abilene

Enhancing the life of residents of the Abilene State Supported Living Center

Health
8
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
9
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
10
Womens Center of Brazoria County Inc

Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Human Services
11
Habitat for Humanity Abilene Inc

Construct and/or rehabilitate houses for sale to low- and moderate-income families who qualify for home ownership. Homes are sold for an affordable mortgage.

Housing & Shelter
12
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Service Center of Abilene; the most unlike its peers is New Beginnings Big Country. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
27/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Day Nursery of Abilene Inc: $499,412 · OtherDay Nursery of Abilene IncNOAH PROJECT INC: $371,880 · OtherNOAH PROJECT INCABILENE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $321,173 · OtherABILENE FIRE DEPARTMENTBoys and Girls Club of Abilene Inc: $250,330 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Abilene IncPresbyterian Medical Care Mission: $224,500 · OtherPresbyterian Medical Care MissionALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: $97,652 · OtherTexas Trails Council Inc: $83,682 · OtherCancer Services Network Inc: $194,390 · OtherCancer Services Network Inc+11 more: $143,034 · Other+11 moreRegional Crime Victim Crisis Center: $202,524 · Human ServicesRegional Crime V…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $121,393 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRI…Abilene Boys Ranch Inc: $112,846 · Human ServicesAbilene Boys Ran…NEW BEGINNINGS BIG COUNTRY: $64,224 · Human ServicesNEW BEGINNINGS B…Alliance for Women and Children: $63,225 · Human ServicesAlliance for Wom…Christian Service Center of Abilene: $34,500 · Human ServicesChristian Servic…+1 more: $9,950 · Human ServicesCommunities in Schools of the Big Country: $316,000 · EducationCommunities…Faithworks of Abilene Inc: $136,974 · EducationFaithworks …Abilene Hope Haven Inc: $365,000 · Housing & ShelterAbilene H…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $227,121 · Youth Development+1 more: $5,256 · Youth DevelopmentSHACKELFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $218,696 · Community Improvement+1 more: $5,000 · Community ImprovementBIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $222,595 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,186,053Human Services$608,662Education$452,974Housing & Shelter$365,000Youth Development$232,377Community Improvement$223,696Crime & Legal$222,595

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDay Nursery of Abilene Inc: $499,412 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetNOAH PROJECT INC: $371,880 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $227,121 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPresbyterian Medical Care Mission: $224,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSHACKELFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $218,696 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetRegional Crime Victim Crisis Center: $202,524 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetCancer Services Network Inc: $194,390 over 8y, 16% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $121,393 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTexas Trails Council Inc: $83,682 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS BIG COUNTRY: $64,224 over 7y, 21% of budgetAlliance for Women and Children: $63,225 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetAdult Protective Services Partners Inc: $35,225 over 6y, 57% of budgetChristian Service Center of Abilene: $34,500 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC: $18,326 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAbilene Chamber of Commerce: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Contemporary Arts: $10,993 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetNational Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat: $10,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $9,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AHEC ORGANIZATION INC: $8,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC: $5,256 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAbilene Back the Badge Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Day Nursery of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds NOAH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Hope Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds Communities in Schools of the Big Country ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR ↗
  • Who funds Presbyterian Medical Care Mission ↗
  • Who funds BIG COUNTRY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHACKELFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Regional Crime Victim Crisis Center ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Services Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds Faithworks of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Boys Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds Texas Trails Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS BIG COUNTRY ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Women and Children ↗
  • Who funds Adult Protective Services Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds Christian Service Center of Abilene ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds Center for Contemporary Arts ↗
  • Who funds National Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AHEC ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Strength for Life Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Back the Badge Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of AbileneTX54.4× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Abilene · Shelton Family Foundation · Barber Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Greathouse Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Abilene Christian University · Food Bank of West Central Texas · The Karakin Foundation · Directors Foundation · The Massey Family Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Abilene funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Abilene. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Abilene’s filings →

    More from the funding graph