Skip to content
United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt

To promote voluntary giving and services, support human needs, help children succeed, improve education, promote financial stability and empower healthy living in the greater yankton community

$430k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.6MYouth Development$449kEducation$337kHealth$288kFood & Nutrition$109kCrime & Legal$63kArts & Culture$46kHousing & Shelter$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $347,545, the rows itemized in this filing. The $430,158 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $82,613 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $224k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$970k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER$96,000
PATHWAYS SHELTER$64,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YANKTON$64,000
YANKTON TRANSIT$44,000
YANKTON FOOD FOR THOUGHT$22,000
SOUTHEAST CASA$12,000
CORNERSTONE CAREER CENTER$9,750
SERVANTS HEART CLINIC$8,750
YANKTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$7,600
LEWIS & CLARK BEHAVIORAL$6,973
YANKTON AREA ARTS ASSOCIATION$6,972
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COU$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $429k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $96k → 11%RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $64k → 11%RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $61k → 11%RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $60k → 11%RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $52k → 11%FAMILY ED & COUNSELING CENTER: $18k → 11%FAMILY ED & COUNSELING CENTER: $15k → 11%SOUTHEAST CASA: $15k → 11%SOUTHEAST CASA: $13k → 11%SOUTHEAST CASA: $12k → 11%SOUTHEAST CASA: $12k → 11%SOUTHEAST CASA: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 12 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$1.7M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-27%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONTACT-REFERRAL CENTER FOR HUMAN RESOURCES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $456k · revenue +77% · 52% of their budget
  • RC
    RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $333k · revenue +23%
  • YT
    Yankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit
    5× · 2020–2024 · $207k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SC
    SIOUX COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -27%
  • YT
    YANKTON THRIVE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue -39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca of Fort Dodge Ia

We are a state licensed substance abuse facility which functions to provide a clinically managed residence treatment center for women and women with children.

—
2
Young Womens Christian Association of Lewiston-Clarkston Inc

To empower victims of domestic and sexual violence and abuse by providing safe shelter options and supportive advocacy services including 24-hour crisis help line, information and referral, court support, and support groups.

Human Services
3
South Dakota Coalition Ending Domestic and Sexual Violence

To provide training and assistance to shelters for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

—
4
Greater Sioux Community Health Center Inc

The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.

Health
5
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
6
Keuka Housing Council Inc

To improve the quality and quantity of housing in yates county.

Housing & Shelter
7
Share-a-Home of Yadkin County Inc

Independent living arrangements: a supportive housing opportunity is provided for elderely persons to live independently which otherwise would require institutional care.

—
8
Central Iowa Juvenile Detention Center

To provide a highly structured environment which emphasizes a safety and security to all juveniles while serving as a deterrent to criminal and anti-social behaviors. Working youth in the center and communities.

—
9
Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii
Health
10
Yellowstone County Assistance Network

To empower people living in the big horn basin of wyoming to enhance health and employment status, overcome obsticales, and end economic hardship.

Human Services
11
Eastern Star Home of South Dakota Incorporated

Provide quality care and services to residents in assisted living and nursing home facilities.

—
12
Siouxland Community Soup Kitchen

The purpose of the corporation is to provide food and meals to those in need.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yankton Area Senior Citizen; the most unlike its peers is Family Education and Counseling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONTACT-REFERRAL CENTER FOR HUMAN RESOURCES: $456,493 · EducationCONTACT-REFERRAL CENTER FOR H…RIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $333,100 · Human ServicesRIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENC…SOUTHEAST CASA PROGRAM: $62,850 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST CASA PROGRAMFAMILY EDUCATION AND COUNSELING CENTER INC: $33,250 · Human ServicesFAMILY EDUCATION AND COUNSE…Yankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit: $206,500 · OtherYankton Transit Inc dba So…YANKTON AREA SENIOR CITIZEN: $146,500 · OtherYANKTON AREA SENIOR CITIZE…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COUNTY: $41,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YA…+3 more: $22,300 · Other+3 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MISSOURI RIVER AREA: $328,100 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF …SERVANT HEARTS CLINIC: $41,550 · HealthLEWIS AND CLARK BEHAVIORAL: $6,973 · HealthYANKTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $38,950 · Arts & CultureYankton Area Arts Association: $6,972 · Arts & CultureCornerstones Career Learning Center: $31,250 · Employment
Education$456,493Human Services$429,200Other$416,300Youth Development$328,100Health$48,523Arts & Culture$45,922Employment$31,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONTACT-REFERRAL CENTER FOR HUMAN RESOURCES: $456,493 over 5y, 52% of budgetRIVER CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $333,100 over 5y, 10% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MISSOURI RIVER AREA: $328,100 over 5y, 13% of budgetYankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit: $206,500 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetYANKTON AREA SENIOR CITIZEN: $146,500 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetSOUTHEAST CASA PROGRAM: $62,850 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetSERVANT HEARTS CLINIC: $41,550 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COUNTY: $41,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetYANKTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $38,950 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetFAMILY EDUCATION AND COUNSELING CENTER INC: $33,250 over 2y, 16% of budgetCornerstones Career Learning Center: $31,250 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetEMBE: $12,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS AND CLARK BEHAVIORAL: $6,973 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYankton Area Arts Association: $6,972 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetSIOUX COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYANKTON THRIVE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Communit…Avera HealthFirst Interstate Banc…The Mike Cindy and Ky…Amazonsmile Foundation
South Dakota Community FoundationSD23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Avera Health · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home