Skip to content

South Dakota · Public charity

United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt

To promote voluntary giving and services, support human needs, help children succeed, improve education, promote financial stability and empower healthy living in the greater yankton community

$430k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Itemized grants FY2024
9
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$348k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$12,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$96,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 12
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$970k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$348k18%
FY20239$344k0%
FY202212$335k17%
FY202110$307k0%
FY202012$421kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.6MYouth Development$449kEducation$337kHealth$288kFood & Nutrition$109kCrime & Legal$63kArts & Culture$46kHousing & Shelter$41kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 16 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetContact-Referral Center for Human Resources: $456,493 over 5y, 52% of budgetRiver City Domestic Violence Center: $333,100 over 5y, 10% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of the Missouri River Area: $328,100 over 5y, 13% of budgetYankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit: $206,500 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetYankton Area Senior Citizen: $146,500 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetSoutheast Casa Program: $62,850 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetServant Hearts Clinic: $41,550 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Yankton County: $41,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetYankton County Historical Society: $38,950 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetFamily Education and Counseling Center Inc: $33,250 over 2y, 16% of budgetCornerstones Career Learning Center: $31,250 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetEmbe: $12,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLewis and Clark Behavioral: $6,973 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYankton Area Arts Association: $6,972 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetSioux Council Boy Scouts of America Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYankton Thrive Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Avera Health · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt with peer funders

About United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt

How much does United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt give?
United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt reported 12 itemized grants totaling $347,545, out of $430,158 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 12 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (54%), Youth Development (15%), Education (11%).
Who are United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Contact-Referral Center for Human Resources ($456k), River City Domestic Violence Center ($333k), Boys & Girls Club of the Missouri River Area ($328k).
Does United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include South Dakota Community Foundation, Avera Health, First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc.
Where is United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt based?
United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt is based in SD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way and Volunteer Services of Greater Yankt’s filings →

More from the funding graph