Skip to content

· Public charity

United Steelworkers International

The mission statement of the organizatin includes, but is not limited to, on behalf of its members, collective bargaining, greivance procedures, arbitration, strike benefits, education, and to improve the working conditions of its members.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$22kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$14kHousing & Shelter$10kEmployment$10kMembership Benefit$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $47,574 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,574 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$988k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way of Allen COunty$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 6% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Our Time To Serve Group: $8k → 5%Boys and Girls Club: $5k → 12%Hoosier Heartland Area Labor Federation: $5k → 16%ICAN: $7k → 5%Boys and Girls club: $5k → 12%Boys & Girls Club: $5k → 12%United Way: $10k → 12%Toys for Tots: $5k → 12%Toys for Tots: $5k → 12%NE Inidana AFL CIO: $10k → 12%Veterans National Project: $10k → 12%United Way of Allen COunty: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 3 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$46k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’25
PhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue -6%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue -13%
  • IC
    INDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $14k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +106%
  • NI
    NORTHEAST INDIANA BUILDING TRADES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • TF
    TOYS FOR TOTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +118%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Electical Workers Indianapolis Motorcycle Group Inc
Human Services
2
Indiana State Afl-Cio

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
3
Construction Industry Progress Council of Indiana Inc

Top notch is an association of diverse construction employers and labor organizations partnering to coordinate the interests, goals and efforts of the union construction industry. our mission is to market the work product of the union…

—
4
Indiana Veteran Initiative Inc

Partnering with veterans, their families, indiana employers, and communities to facilitate a meaningful transition to civilian life while strengthening indiana's economy.

Public Benefit
5
Assoc Builders & Contractors of Indiana

Promote the building and contracting trade.

—
6
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
7
Tri-County Workforce Investment Board Inc

Activities of tcwib include only those specifically designated under the workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa).

Employment
8
Central Indiana Building and Construction Trades Council

Labor organization

—
9
Pro Bono Indiana Inc

To promote equal access to justice for all indiana residents regardless of economic status

Health
10
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
11
The Indiana Plan for Equal Employment Inc

The indiana plan recruits women and minorities to enter construction apprenticeship programs to encourage gainful employment.

Employment
12
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Toys for Tots Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC: $17,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INCMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $5,100 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIO…NORTHEAST INDIANA BUILDING TRADES: $10,000 · OtherNORTHEAST INDIANA BUILDING T…TOYS FOR TOTS INC: $5,200 · OtherTOYS FOR TOTS INCHoosier Heartland Area Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $5,000 · OtherHoosier Heartland Area Labor…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS O…INDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC: $14,250 · HealthINDIANA CANINE ASSI…VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10,000 · Public BenefitVETERANS COMM…
Philanthropy$22,100Other$20,200Youth Development$15,000Health$14,250Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC: $14,250 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA BUILDING TRADES: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTOYS FOR TOTS INC: $5,200 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoosier Heartland Area Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Steelworkers International funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Steelworkers International. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Steelworkers International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph