Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes as allowed by section 501c3 of the internal revenue code, including, for such purposes, identifying, researching, analyzing, and pursuing solutions to problems of consumer protection, environmental preservation, corporate and governmental…

$628k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$588k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0162% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Social Science$588kPublic Benefit$263kEducation$112kRecreation & Sports$106kCivil Rights$106kEnvironment$103kHuman Services$74kHealth$10kOther$838k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $250k+1 grant · $588k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH$588,000
STUDENT ORGANIZING INC$10,000
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND$10,000
ILLINOIS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Student Organizing Inc: $23k → 16%MASSPIRG FOUNDATION: $23k → 16%Student Organizing Inc: $18k → 16%STUDENT ORGANIZING INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$419k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
0%

Still filing today

67%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $588k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCivil RightsPublic BenefitSocial ScienceEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    ILLINOIS PIRG EDUCATION FUND INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +79%
  • SO
    STUDENT ORGANIZING INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $74k · revenue +138%
  • WP
    WASHINGTON PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $72k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • NE
    NAACP Empowerment Programs
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • OT
    ONWARD TOGETHER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue -93%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR DIGITAL DEMOCRACYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $46k · revenue +63% · 70% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Public Interest Research Group Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to promote social welfare within the meaning of Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. The corporation's activities may include public education, research, litigation, and advocacy on issues…

Public Benefit
2
New Mexico Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc

The Corporation is organized for the purposes of enhancing the social welfare of all New Mexicans through advocacy on issues of environmental and public concern. This objective shalll be achieved by the following means: (A) The corporation…

—
3
Illinois State Public Interest Research Group Inc

When consumers are cheated or the voices of ordinary citizens are drowned out by special interest lobbyists, illinoispirg speaks up and takes action. we uncover threats to public health and wellbeing and fight to end them, using the…

—
4
North Carolina Public Interest Research Group Educ Fund Inc

The purpose for which this corporation is organized is: To act on behalf of the public interest by means of charitable, educational, or any other activities within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Within these…

—
5
North Carolina Public Interest Research Group Citizen Lobby Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to identify, research and analyze problems affecting the public interest and social welfare, and to engage in advocacy, education and litigation in furtherance of the public interest.

—
6
United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes as allowed by section 501c3 of the internal revenue code, including, for such purposes, identifying, researching, analyzing, and pursuing…

Public Benefit
7
Copirg Citizen Lobby Inc

The purpose of purposes for which the corporation is organized is to operate exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, and is not organized or operated for profit.

—
8
United States Public Interest Research Group Inc

Operate exclusively for the promotion of social welfare by undertaking the following activities: (a) to identify problems and advocate solutions in the areas of: (1) consumer protection; (2) environmental preservation; (3) protection…

—
9
Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group Inc

Our team of researchers uncovers the facts; our staff brings our findings to the public through media as well as one-on-one interactions; and our advocates bring the voice of the public to the halls of power on behalf of consumers.

—
10
Pennsylvania Public Interest Research Group Inc

Pennsylvania public interest group delivers persistent, result oriented public interest activism that protects consumers, encourages a fair and sustainable economy, and fosters a democratic government.

Public Benefit
11
Environment Georgia Research and Policy Center

The corporation is organized for the purpose of conducting public interest research, policy development, analysis, and education to protect the environment and people of Georgia, including, but not limited to, the quality of Georgia's air,…

—
12
California Public Interest Research Group Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to promote social welfare within the meaning of section 501c4 of the internal revenue code. activities may include but are not limited to, research, education and advocacy in the areas of consumer…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Public Interest Research Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Center for Digital Democracy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/22
Grantees still filing
7/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAACP Empowerment Programs — $200,000 · OtherNAACP Empowerment ProgramsTEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC — $136,000 · OtherTEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION …ENVIRONMENT COLORADO RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC — $97,000 · OtherENVIRONMENT COLORADO RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER…MARYLAND PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $83,000 · OtherMARYLAND PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH FOUNDATION IN…WASHINGTON PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FOUNDATION — $72,000 · OtherWASHINGTON PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FOUND…NEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FUND INC — $50,000 · OtherNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FUND IN…ARIZONA PIRG EDUCATION FUND INC — $47,594 · OtherConnPIRG Education Fund — $37,000 · OtherSTUDENT ORGANIZING INC — $73,887 · OtherSTUDENT ORGANIZING INC+7 more — $125,000 · Other+7 moreCENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH INC — $588,000 · Social ScienceCENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST RES…ILLINOIS PIRG EDUCATION FUND INC — $167,500 · Public BenefitILLINOIS PIRG…MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC — $95,000 · Public BenefitMASSACHUSETTS…Pennsylvania Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc — $112,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDU FUND — $105,500 · Recreation & SportsONWARD TOGETHER FOUNDATION — $60,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR DIGITAL DEMOCRACY — $45,500 · Civil RightsOSPIRG FOUNDATION INC — $58,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC — $35,000 · EnvironmentPENNENVIRONMENT RESEARCH & POLICY CENTER INC — $10,000 · Environment
Other$921,481Social Science$588,000Public Benefit$262,500Education$112,000Recreation & Sports$105,500Civil Rights$105,500Environment$103,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetILLINOIS PIRG EDUCATION FUND INC — $167,500 over 6y, 25% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC — $136,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetPennsylvania Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc — $112,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetCALIFORNIA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDU FUND — $105,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC — $95,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetMARYLAND PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $83,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetSTUDENT ORGANIZING INC — $73,887 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetWASHINGTON PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FOUNDATION — $72,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetONWARD TOGETHER FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetOSPIRG FOUNDATION INC — $58,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FUND INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetARIZONA PIRG EDUCATION FUND INC — $47,594 over 3y, 13% of budgetCENTER FOR DIGITAL DEMOCRACY — $45,500 over 1y, 70% of budgetENVIRONMENT AMERICA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC — $35,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPIRG NEW VOTERS PROJECT INC — $30,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWISPIRG FOUNDATION INC — $27,000 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetPENNENVIRONMENT RESEARCH & POLICY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Environment America R…United States Energy …The Energy FoundationTides FoundationVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Environment America Research and Policy Center IncCO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Environment America Research and Policy Center Inc · United States Energy Foundation · The Energy Foundation · Tides Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines