Skip to content

Oregon · Public charity

United Rotary Clubs of Lane County

Supporting efforts to prevent child abuse by funding worthy, local projects.

$300k
Granted FY2019
5
Itemized grants FY2019
5
Organizations funded FY2019
20%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2019
$200k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$40,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$45,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 5
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
1

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 20% of the organizations United Rotary Clubs of Lane County funded were first-time grantees, receiving 23% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Crime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20195$200k20%
FY20185$200k80%
FY20175$200kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Crime & Legal$250kHuman Services$160kHealth$85kYouth Development$65kEducation$40k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget United Rotary Clubs of Lane County supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCasa of Lane County: $85,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetDirection Service: $80,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCenter for Community Counseling: $80,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetBridgeway House: $65,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMental Health for Children Inc Riverview Center for Growth: $45,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPearl Buck Center Incorporated: $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWillamette Family Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRelief Nursery Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chambers Family FoundationOR26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chambers Family Foundation · McKay Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · United Way of Lane County · Pacificsource Foundation for Health Improvement · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Woodard Family Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Juan Young Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · R & M Clark Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare United Rotary Clubs of Lane County with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to United Rotary Clubs of Lane County?

Find your warmest path to United Rotary Clubs of Lane County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About United Rotary Clubs of Lane County

How much does United Rotary Clubs of Lane County give?
United Rotary Clubs of Lane County reported 5 itemized grants totaling $200,000, out of $299,740 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does United Rotary Clubs of Lane County fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (42%), Human Services (27%), Health (14%).
Who are United Rotary Clubs of Lane County's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: Casa of Lane County ($85k), Parenting Now ($85k), Direction Service ($80k).
Does United Rotary Clubs of Lane County fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as United Rotary Clubs of Lane County?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Chambers Family Foundation, McKay Family Foundation, The Oregon Community Foundation.
Where is United Rotary Clubs of Lane County based?
United Rotary Clubs of Lane County is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Rotary Clubs of Lane County’s filings →

More from the funding graph