Loading…
· Public charity
UNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF LANE COUNTY
Supporting efforts to prevent child abuse by funding worthy, local projects.
$300k
Granted FY2019
5
Grants
1
Communities
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of UNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF LANE COUNTY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2019 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- SOUTH LANE FAMILY NURSERY INC$45,000
- PARENTING NOW$40,000
- DIRECTION SERVICE$40,000
- CENTER FOR COMMUNITY COUNSELING$40,000
- BRIDGEWAY HOUSE$35,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Family Support Center of the
Child respite and child abuse prevention.
—
2
Families Helping Families of
Counseling - the organization serves as a resourse center for individuals with disabilities and families who have children with special needs. services include referral, training, and evaluation.
Human Services
3
Coastal Families Relief Nursery
We partner with vulnerable families to identify their needs, set strength-based goals, and provide ongoing support using a holistic approach that includes therapeutic early childhood program classrooms, home visits, outreach services, and…
Crime & Legal
4
Impact Family Counseling
Provide comprehensive, faith-based counseling services to troubled youth and their families through the use of trained professional counselors, therapists, and volunteers.
Crime & Legal
5
Childrens Crisis Center
Child abuse prevention
Crime & Legal
6
Children's Center Early Intervention &
The Children's Center, as a nonprofit organization, provides quality, family-focused services for children; specializes in meeting the developmental needs of children with special needs by offering programs which encourage individual…
Health
7
Oslc Community Programs
Provide outpatient mental and behavioral therapy for children and families, therapeutic treatment foster care to at-risk youth, as well as a variety of parent training services.
Science & Tech
8
Denali Family Services
Supporting children and families through individual, community-based services. We provide behavioral health services to severely emotionally disturbed children (ages 2 to 24) and their families.
Health
9
Ccmh Child Care Center
Providing childcare services to the community
Human Services
10
Family Crisis Center Inc
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Human Services
11
Family Service Inc
Family & individual counseling
—
12
Oregon Child Abuse Solutions
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
Crime & Legal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Relief Nursery Inc and the most unlike its peers is Center for Community Counseling. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$165,000Crime & Legal$125,000Youth Development$65,000Civil Rights$45,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Chambers Family FoundationOR20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Chambers Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · McKay Family Foundation · United Way of Lane County · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · R & M Clark Family Foundation · Faye & Lucille Stewart Foundation · Storms Family Foundation · The Woodard Family Foundation · Pacificsource Foundation For
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation UNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF LANE COUNTY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Relief Nursery Inc — 31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CENTER FOR COMMUNITY COUNSELING.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue held over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 930852042 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CENTER FOR COMMUNITY COUNSELING, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to United Rotary Clubs of Lane County?
Find your warmest path to United Rotary Clubs of Lane County through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines