Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Professional Horsemen's Association Foundation Inc

To educate the public in general horsemanship and matters related to the welfare of horses by any means conducive to that end; to educate and train individuals in the art of horsemanship; to encourage and promote horse shows and stimulate interest in and awareness of the general public in horse shows; to encourage, promote, and advance…

$254k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of UNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $187,221 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $254,145 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $66,924 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $171k
$68,717
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$101,814
UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC$68,717
SADDLEBRED RESCUE$10,752
BLANCHES BLESSINGS$5,938
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION: $103k → 15%BLANCHES BLESSINGS: $6k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $120k → 17%SADDLEBRED RESCUE: $11k → 7%HORSESENSING: $9k → 9%UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $69k → 10%UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $323k → 15%MISFIT TOYS RESCUE DIVISION INC: $5k → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $102k → 17%HORSESENSING: $8k → 9%UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $61k → 10%UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION: $180k → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $93k → 17%UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION: $106k → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $85k → 17%UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $105k → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $39k → 17%UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC: $59k → 15%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $38k → 17%AMERICAN SADDLEBRED HORSE ASSOCIATION: $42k → 15%AMERICAN SADDLEBRED HORSE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 15%UNITED STATES SADDLE SEAT ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 4 repeat orgs$302k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$1.4M
$285k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $477k · revenue +125%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SADDLEBRED HORSE AND BREEDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $52k · revenue +119%
  • HI
    HORSESENSING INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $16k · revenue +319%

Funded once

  • UP
    UNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION CHAPTER 14 INC
    one grant, 2019 · $119k
  • AR
    AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $103k · revenue -47%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $34k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Horse Show Association of America Ltd

The national horse show association of america, ltd. was founded in 1883 and reorganized in 1972 as a nonprofit corporation. the association was organized to advance equestrian sports in the united states.

Recreation & Sports
2
World Ranch Horse Association
Animals
3
Harness Racing Museum and Hall of Fame

The harness racing museum & hall of fame is dedicated to comprehensive, active and authoritative support and promotion of the standardbred racing through documentation and preservation of the history and traditions of this american-born…

Arts & Culture
4
National Reining Horse Association

The corporation is formed to promte and encourage public interest in agricultural and ranching through reining horse shows and programs; to develop standards and performance and judging of reinging horses; to encourage the development and…

Food & Nutrition
5
United States Hunter Jumper Association Inc

The mission of the ushja is to unify and represent the hunter and jumper disciplines of equestrian sport through education, recognition and sport programs.

Recreation & Sports
6
Virginia Horse Shows Association Inc

The vhsa is an association of show and individual members cooperating to promote the sport and to improve the breeding of horses in the commonwealth of virginia.

7
Arabian Horse Association

To aid and encourage the breeding, exhibiting, use and perpetuation of the arabian horse as well as the half-arabian and anglo-arabian horses.

8
United States Sports Horse Breeders Association

To support the efforts of u.s. sport horse breeders through education, recognition and outreach.

Animals
9
American Paint Horse Association

The mission of the american paint horse association is to collect, record and preserve the pedigrees of american paint horses, and to stimulate and regulate all matters pertaining to the promotion, history, breeding and exhibition of this…

10
American Saddlebred Association of Arizona Inc

The organization accomplishes its goals primarily through the horse shows which are run every year. the horse shows are a means of educting the public with respect to safe and proper horsemanship as well as encouraging safe equestrian…

Animals
11
United Professional Horsemen's Association Foundation Inc

To educate the public in general horsemanship and matters related to the welfare of horses by any means conducive to that end; to educate and train individuals in the art of horsemanship; to encourage and promote horse shows and stimulate…

12
American Quarter Horse Association

To record and preserve the pedigree of the American Quarter Horse, while maintaining its welfare and integrity and promoting lifelong enjoyment of the breed.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Saddlebred Horse and Breeders Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ohio State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC — $902,490 · OtherUPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC+3 more — $25,938 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $476,536 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOS…+1 more — $16,120 · HealthUNITED PROFESSIONAL HORSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION CHAPTER 14 INC — $118,684 · AnimalsUNITED PROF…AMERICAN SADDLEBRED HORSE AND BREEDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $52,405 · AnimalsAMERICAN SA…Saddlebred Rescue Inc — $10,752 · AnimalsSaddlebred …AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC — $103,278 · Recreation & SportsUnited States Saddle Seat Association Inc — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $33,500 · Education
Other$928,428Health$492,656Animals$181,841Recreation & Sports$113,278Education$33,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPHA MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION INC — $902,490 over 7y, 40% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $476,536 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC — $103,278 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SADDLEBRED HORSE AND BREEDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $52,405 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $33,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORSESENSING INC — $16,120 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSaddlebred Rescue Inc — $10,752 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Professional Horsemen's Association Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Professional Horsemen's Association Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to United Professional Horsemen's Association Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph