Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Good Neighbors of Jefferson Count

Soliciation of funds for charitable purposes.

$146k
Granted FY2017
7
Grants FY2017
States reached
$93k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of United Good Neighbors of Jefferson Count’s FY2017 grant dollars went to Jefferson County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2017 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What you fund
01FY2017 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
$7,554
Median grant
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$93,310
OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION$12,340
YMCA$11,937
DISCOVERY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES$7,554
JUMPING MOUSE CHILDREN'S CENTER$7,031
ECHHO$5,602
DOVE HOUSE$5,465
02Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $93,310 · PhilanthropyJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS — $12,340 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC COMMUNITY A…OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN — $11,937 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC PENINSULA Y…Jumping Mouse Childrens Center — $7,031 · OtherJumping M…DOVE HOUSE ADVOCACY SERVICES — $5,465 · OtherDOVE HOUS…JEFFERSON COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENT DBA DISCOVERY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE — $7,554 · Youth DevelopmentECHHO ECUMENICAL CHRISTIAN HELPING — $5,602 · Religion
Philanthropy$93,310Human Services$24,277Other$12,496Youth Development$7,554Religion$5,602

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $93,310 over 1y, 13% of budgetOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS — $12,340 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN — $11,937 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENT DBA DISCOVERY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE — $7,554 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetECHHO ECUMENICAL CHRISTIAN HELPING — $5,602 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetDOVE HOUSE ADVOCACY SERVICES — $5,465 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jefferson Community FoundationWA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jefferson Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Robert and Susan Brown Family Foundation Inc · I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation · First Fed Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Good Neighbors of Jefferson Count funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    03Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Good Neighbors of Jefferson Count?

    Find your warmest path to United Good Neighbors of Jefferson Count through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph