· Public charity
United Fund of Globe-Miami Inc
United fund of globe-miami, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $325k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GILA HOUSE INC | $65,000 |
| GILA COUNTY 4H LEADERS COUNCIL | $55,011 |
| FRIENDS OF GLOBE PUBLIC LIBRA | $37,500 |
| GILA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $33,000 |
| COPPER CITIES YOUTH SPORTS | $29,833 |
| BULLION PLAZA CULTURAL CENTER | $26,200 |
| COBRE VALLEY C FOR THE ARTS | $25,000 |
| GILA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIET | $24,000 |
| ST VINCENT'S OF HOLY ANGELS | $22,500 |
| GILA AGING C O CATOHLIC COMMUNITY SERVICE | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF MIAMI MEMORIAL LIBRARY | $18,500 |
| HIGH DESERT HUMANE SOCIETY | $18,333 |
| PINAL MOUNTAIN FD FOR HIGHER | $17,500 |
| MONSOON YOUTH EDUCATION PROGRAM | $16,000 |
| GTF BOOST | $15,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCOPPER CITIES YOUTH BASKETBALL LEAGUE7× · 2018–2024 · $189k · revenue +186% · 29% of their budget
- BPBULLION PLAZA CULTURAL CENTER & MUSEUM7× · 2018–2024 · $173k · revenue +6% · 51% of their budget
- HDHIGH DESERT HUMANE SOCIETY7× · 2018–2024 · $149k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- PCPINAL-GILA COUNCIL FOR SENIOR CITIZENSone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +4%
- DEDylan Earven Foundationone grant, 2018 · $8k
- GCGila County Educ Svc Agcyone grant, 2019 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Goodwill Industries of Southern Arizona works toward ensuring that all people have the opportunity to reach their potential and contribute to our community. Through quality, evidence-based, workforce development programs; Goodwill…
Through the operation of museums and support of historic preservation we will attempt to interpret and conserve our historical and cultural heritage. Through the presentation and support of cultural and educational programs we will attempt…
We offer trauma-responsive prevention education programs and services, youth coalition leadership development, and community resource navigation. The community coalitions we support form a network committed to fostering resilience in…
Support gcso in rescue and searches
As the official philanthropic and collaborative partner of the grand canyon national park, grand canyon conservancy's mission is to inspire generations of park champions to cherish and support the natural and cultural wonder of the grand…
Maintain the history of Gilbert AZ and to illustrate how life was lived over the last approximately 100 years since Gilbert came into existence. Also promotes arts and culture through intergenerational programs.
Villa anita is a museum devoted to educating guests about the creative reuse of materials and sustainable way of life in the american desert. providing artist with a place to create their art while providing workshops and art classes for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pinal-Gila Council for Senior Citizens and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GILA HOUSE INC GILA HOUSE GILA SAFE HAVEN ALDERMAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE ↗
- Who funds COBRE VALLEY YOUTH CLUB ↗
- Who funds GILA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds COPPER CITIES YOUTH BASKETBALL LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds GILA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BULLION PLAZA CULTURAL CENTER & MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HIGH DESERT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE COBRE VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ART INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc ↗
- Who funds PINAL MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION FOR HIGH EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds MIAMI GENESIS INC ↗
- Who funds MONSOON YOUTH EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HORIZON HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona Youth Partnership ↗
- Who funds PINAL-GILA COUNCIL FOR SENIOR CITIZENS ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND CANYON COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MIAMI ARTS COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA RESERVATION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LEAD GUITAR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · America's Charities · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Fund of Globe-Miami Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to United Fund of Globe-Miami Inc?
Find your warmest path to United Fund of Globe-Miami Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.