Skip to content
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$290k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$4.0MPhilanthropy$827kAnimals$560kHuman Services$221kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kCrime & Legal$30kYouth Development$20k
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $1,387,129, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,837,358 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $450,229 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $332k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $760k
  • $250k+1 grant · $290k
$60,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER GOOD CHARITIES$289,850
FAMILY CRISIS SUPPORT SERVICES$100,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER$60,000
IRIS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER$60,000
LIVESAFE RESOURCES INC$60,000
WOMEN'S ADVOCATES$60,000
TUBMAN$60,000
DEEP ROOTS$60,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM$60,000
RESPONSE HELP FOR SURVIVORS OF DV & SA$60,000
SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE$60,000
FAMILY ABUSE CENTER$60,000
ALEXANDRA HOUSE$60,000
LIFEWIRE$43,527
WINGS OF HOPE FAMILY CRISIS SERVICES$43,205
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW LIFE CENTER: $20k → 11%CO RIVER REGIONAL CRISIS SERVICES: $6k → 20%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $60k → 7%YWCA MISSOULA: $20k → 9%SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $60k → 12%MONARCH SERVICES: $33k → 13%DOVES OF BIG BEAR VALLEY: $20k → 14%TEACH INC: $16k → 14%LI AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $20k → 7%YWCA NORTHEASTERN NY: $60k → 12%THE GRACE CENTER: $11k → 10%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES: $20k → 16%YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $60k → 16%WINGS OF HOPE FAMILY CRISIS SERVICES: $43k → 19%MARYS HOUSE: $59k → 16%SHELTERHOUSE: $20k → 9%YWCA WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $20k → 11%HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $13k → 8%NORTH STAR ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 17%TURNINGPOINT FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $60k → 9%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES: $60k → 11%EMBRACE SERVICES INC: $37k → 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $17k → 8%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $6k → 12%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $20k → 14%REACH OF HAYWOOD COUNTY INC: $20k → 12%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $40k → 7%PEACE HOUSE INC: $20k → 5%SAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $20k → 6%RESPONSE HELP FOR SURVIVORS OF DV & SA: $60k → 6%RENEW INC: $5k → 15%COBURN PLACE SAFE HAVEN: $24k → 16%BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER: $60k → 13%YWCA OF CHARLESTON RESOLVE FAMILY ABUSE: $20k → 18%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $6k → 6%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $19k → 12%SAFE NEST: $20k → 13%DEEP ROOTS: $60k → 10%WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $20k → 7%NEXTSTEP DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT: $20k → 11%WINGS OF HOPE FAMILY CRISIS SERVICES: $20k → 19%HOPE HAVEN OF CASS COUNTY: $7k → 8%SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE: $60k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $20k → 16%LIFEWIRE: $44k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 12 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
113

Total granted

$1.5M
$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+17%

Still filing today

92%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $934k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GREATER GOOD CHARITIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $853k · revenue +125%
  • AA
    ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $87k · revenue +136%
  • NI
    NEWHOUSE INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $78k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • SW
    SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -7%
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF CECIL COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -28% · 27% of their budget
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CIgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
2
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
3
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
4
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
5
Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

Rape crisis and abuse shelter

—
6
Safe of Columbia County

Domestic and sexual violence intervention, support, and education.

—
7
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
8
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
9
Second Chance Dv Sa Shelter

Assist individuals and families experiencing domestic abuse and sexual assault by providing crisis intervention and a full range of support services. second chance also works to emplower the community to understand and prevent the crimes…

Arts & Culture
10
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
11
Dove House Advocacy Services

With wrap-around services, dove house seeks to address the needs of victimes of domestic violence, sexual assaultm and general crime in jefferson county as they navigate the many systems required to move from being victims to surviving and…

—
12
Manitowoc County Domestic Violence Center Inc

To provide shelter, crisis intervention, and supportive services for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and their families, with a commitment to safety, respect and promoting self-determination.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault Crisis Center of Warren County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Florida State Animal Response. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

167 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
165/167
Grantees still filing
121/167
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STILLWATER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $63,205 · Human Services+58 more: $1,802,751 · Human Services+58 moreFAMILY CRISIS SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $100,000 · OtherFAMILY CRISIS SUPPORT SERVICES …NEWHOUSE INC: $78,275 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $73,485 · OtherCOMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF CECIL COUNTY INC: $60,000 · OtherHAVEN: $60,000 · OtherFINDING GRACE MINISTRIES: $60,000 · OtherLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $60,000 · OtherLiveSafe Resources Inc: $60,000 · OtherTHE GLYNN COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE SEXUAL ASSAULTSPOUSE ABUSE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $60,000 · OtherPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC: $60,000 · OtherDOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $53,400 · OtherVERDE VALLEY SANCTUARY: $60,000 · Other+32 more: $671,790 · Other+32 moreGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $852,950 · PhilanthropyGREATER GOOD CHARI…SAFELIGHT INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropySAFELIGHT INCALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $86,858 · AnimalsALAQUA ANIMAL REF…CATNIP FOUNDATION DBA BIG SKY CARES: $64,755 · AnimalsCATNIP FOUNDATION…CHESAPEAKE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $60,000 · AnimalsCHESAPEAKE HUMANE…BELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $60,000 · AnimalsBELLEVILLE AREA H…FURRY FRIENDS ROCKIN' RESCUE INC: $57,923 · AnimalsFURRY FRIENDS ROC…BUTTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $56,300 · AnimalsBUTTE HUMANE SOCI…THE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI: $52,195 · AnimalsTHE HAMILTON COUN…HUMANE FORT WAYNE INC: $52,000 · AnimalsHUMANE FORT WAYNE…RUFF HAVEN: $45,178 · AnimalsSOURIS VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · AnimalsNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP: $35,712 · Animals+16 more: $265,279 · Animals+16 moreWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC: $78,200 · Housing & ShelterSUNRISE OF PASCO INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Homeless Solutions: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterSerene Harbor Inc: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterLydia's House Inc: $17,120 · Housing & ShelterPEACE RIVER CENTER FOR PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT INC: $60,000 · HealthTUBMAN: $60,000 · HealthOhioGuidestone: $19,800 · HealthSURVIVOR ADVOCACY OUTREACH PROGRAM: $12,950 · HealthCONVERSE HOPE CENTER: $6,500 · HealthFAITH INC: $60,000 · Crime & LegalOKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalNORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$1,865,956Other$1,576,950Philanthropy$912,950Animals$876,200Housing & Shelter$215,320Health$159,250Crime & Legal$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $852,950 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $86,858 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNEWHOUSE INC: $78,275 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC: $78,200 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $73,485 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCATNIP FOUNDATION DBA BIG SKY CARES: $64,755 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetSTILLWATER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $63,205 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $60,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION OF CECIL COUNTY INC: $60,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $60,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDEEP ROOTS INC: $60,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetPEACE RIVER CENTER FOR PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTUBMAN: $60,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHAVEN: $60,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetVERDE VALLEY SANCTUARY: $60,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $60,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $60,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetResponse - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault: $60,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $60,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLiveSafe Resources Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSAFELIGHT INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $60,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE GLYNN COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTHE SEXUAL ASSAULTSPOUSE ABUSE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSUNRISE OF PASCO INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $60,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAITH INC: $60,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetYWCA OF SCHENECTADY: $60,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER I: $60,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetTURNINGPOINT FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE INC: $60,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMARY'S HOUSE MINISTRY ALLIANCE FOR REGAINING YOUR SAFETY: $59,460 over 1y, 55% of budgetFURRY FRIENDS ROCKIN' RESCUE INC: $57,923 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetSTEPS TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $57,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBUTTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $56,300 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $53,400 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HAMILTON COUNTY SPCA INC DBA SPCA CINCINNATI: $52,195 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHUMANE FORT WAYNE INC: $52,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVIOLENCE FREE FUTURES INC: $46,055 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetRUFF HAVEN: $45,178 over 1y, 17% of budgetLifeWire: $43,527 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary Kay Ash Foundati…Greater Good CharitiesThe Gap FoundationPetsmart Charities IncBanfield FoundationMore Than a Phone IncThe Duffield Family F…Alpha Chi Omega Found…Petco LoveThe American Society …Humane World for Anim…Women's Foundation of…
Mary Kay Ash FoundationTX103.1× affinity55 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Greater Good Charities · The Gap Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Banfield Foundation · More Than a Phone Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Alpha Chi Omega Foundation Inc · Petco Love · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Humane World for Animals Inc · Women's Foundation of California

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Animal Nations Dba Redrover funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Animal Nations Dba Redrover. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Center for Family Services: 73% of income from government
  • Steps to End Domestic Violence Inc: 71% of income from government
  • Center for Hope and Safety: 68% of income from government
  • 180 Turning Lives Around: 61% of income from government
  • Hubbard House Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Sunrise of Pasco Inc: 42% of income from government
  • The Spring of Tampa Bay Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Serene Harbor Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Community Action Stops Abuse Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Refuge House Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland: 10% of income from government
  • Survivor Resource Network: 3% of income from government
  • Peace River Center for Personal Development Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Sexual Assaultspouse Abuse Resource Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
61report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to United Animal Nations Dba Redrover?

Find your warmest path to United Animal Nations Dba Redrover through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Animal Nations Dba Redrover’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home